Least Square Approximations and Linear Values of Cooperative Games

1. Banzhaf, J.F.: Weighted voting does not work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. 19, 317–343 (1965)

   Google Scholar 

2. Charnes, A., Golany, B., Keane, M., Rousseau, J.: Extremal principle solutions of games in characteristic function form: core, Chebychev and Shapley value generalizations. In: Sengupta, J.K., Kadekodi, G.K. (eds.) Econometrics of Planning and Efficiency, pp. 123–133. Kluwer Academic Publisher (1988)

   Google Scholar 

3. Derks, J., Haller, H., Peters, H.: The selectope for cooperative games. Int. J. Game Theory 29, 23–38 (2000)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

4. Ding, G., Lax, R., Chen, J., Chen, P., Marx, B.: Transforms of pseudo-Boolean random variables. Discrete Appl. Math. 158, 13–24 (2010)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

5. Faigle, U., Kern, W., Still, G.: Algorithmic Principles of Mathematical Programming. Springer, Dordrecht (2002)

   Book  Google Scholar 

6. Faigle, U., Voss, J.: A system-theoretic model for cooperation, interaction and allocation. Discrete Appl. Math. 159, 1736–1750 (2011)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

7. Grabisch, M.: Set Functions, Games and Capacities in Decision Making. Theory and Decision Library C, vol. 46, Springer (2016)

   Google Scholar 

8. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 563–608. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2005)

   Google Scholar 

9. Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.-L., Roubens, M.: Equivalent representations of set functions. Math. Oper. Res. 25(2), 157–178 (2000)

   Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

10. Hammer, P.L., Holzman, R.: On approximations of pseudo-Boolean functions. RUTCOR Research Report RRR 29–87. State University of New Jersey (1987)

    Google Scholar 

11. Hammer, P.L., Holzman, R.: On approximations of pseudo-Boolean functions. ZOR—Methods Models Oper. Res. 36, 3–21 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Hammer, P.L., Rudeanu, S.: Boolean Methods in Operations Research and Related Areas. Springer, Berlin (1968)

    Book  Google Scholar 

13. Kultti, K., Salonen, H.: Minimum norm solutions for cooperative games. Int. J. Game Theory 35, 591–602 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

14. Marichal, J.-L., Mathonet, P.: Weighted Banzhaf power and interaction indexes through weighted approximations of games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211, 352–358 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

15. Peleg, B., Sudhölter, P.: Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games. Kluwer Academic Publisher (2003)

    Google Scholar 

16. Ruiz, L.M., Valenciano, F., Zarzuelo, J.M.: The family of least-square values for transferable utility games. Games Econ. Behav. 24, 109–130 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

17. Ruiz, L.M., Valenciano, F., Zarzuelo, J.M.: Some new results on least square values for TU games. TOP 6, 139–158 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

18. Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571–587 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

19. Shapley, L.S.: A value for \(n\)-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, Vol. II, Number 28 in Annals of Mathematics Studies, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press (1953)

    Google Scholar 

20. Sun, H., Hao, Z., Xu, G.: Optimal Solutions for TU-Games with Decision Approach. Preprint, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China (2013)

    Google Scholar 

21. Tanino, T.: One-point solutions obtained from best approximation problems for cooperative games. Kybernetika 49, 395–403 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

22. Weber, R.J.: Probabilistic values for games. In: Roth, A.E. (ed.) The Shapley Value, pp. 101–120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references