[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Knowledge Structures as a Basis for Learning Strategies in Engineering Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education (ICL 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 917))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2052 Accesses

Abstract

Conway’s Law, which states that ‘the design of a system will map to the social structure that created it’, is a well-established principle in social network theory, as well as design. But the concept has deeper implications as well. In order for a design to be executed, the knowledge for the design must first be constructed. That observation led to what has been called ‘The Intermediate Corollary’, which then implies that different types of social structures can be mapped to specific knowledge structures. What is then required is a system of social evolution that shows the different social structures in some evolutionary form. For the case of this paper, the social system evolution model is taken from Spiral Dynamics, an outgrowth of Clare Grave’s seminal work, elaborated on by Don Beck and Integral Philosopher Ken Wilber. This system, when modified with the overarching principles contained in Conway’s Law, yields a fundamental basis set of knowledge structures that maps well to fundamental concepts in engineering education. From knowledge fragments, to advanced synergistic heuristics, all have maps from the social structures that create them, to classroom situations where optimal social structures can be utilized for acceleration of student learning. This paper explores the nexus of these main concepts, as well as the notion of optimal classroom groupings for learning different engineering concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 199.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 249.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111(23), 8410–8415 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Crown Pub (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Research Council.: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology. National Academies Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pezeshki, C.: Understanding the NSF Transforming Undergraduate Engineering Education Report–Why are Industry and Academic Pathways toward Knowledge Development at Odds?. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. pp. 26.1627.1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. vol. 1: Cognitive domain, pp. 20–24, New York, McKay (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morshead, Richard W.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook II: affective domain. Stud. Philos. Educ. 4(1), 164–170 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, L.W., et al.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy, Longman Publishing, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pezeshki, C., Kelley, R.: It’s all about relationships: how human relational development and social structures dictate product design in the socio-sphere. In: Product Development in the Socio-sphere, pp. 143–168. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beck, D.E., Cowan, C.: Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership and Change. John Wiley & Sons (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conway, M.E.: How do Committees Invent. Datamation 14(4), 28–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuge, M., Agogino, A.: How Online Design communities evolve over time: the birth and growth of OpenIDEO. In: ASME IDETC/CIE Vol. 7: 2nd Biennial International Conference on Dynamics for Design; 26th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pezeshki, C.: Influencing performance development in student design groups through relational development. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 30(1), 91–100 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Koch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pezeshki, C., Koch, D.A. (2019). Knowledge Structures as a Basis for Learning Strategies in Engineering Education. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 917. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11935-5_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics