A Novel Mathematical Model to Design UAV Trajectory for Search and Rescue Operations in Disaster

1. San Juan, V., Santos, M., Andújar, J.M.: Intelligent UAV map generation and discrete path planning for search and rescue operations. Complexity 2018, 1–17 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

2. Chen, S.W., Li, Y.Z., Xing, S.Q., Wang, X.S., Sato, M.: Urban damage evaluation using polarimetric SAR data. In International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp. 2754–2757 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

3. Xu, Z., et al.: Development of an UAS for post-earthquake disaster surveying and its application in Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Comput. Geosci. 68(2014), 22–30 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Chen, J., et al.: Damage degree evaluation of earthquake area using UAV aerial image. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2016, 1–10 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

5. Waharte, S., Trigoni, N.: Supporting search and rescue operations with UAVs. In 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies, pp. 142–147 (2010)

   Google Scholar 

6. Jun, M., Andrea, R.D’.: Path planning for unmanned aerial vehicles in uncertain and adversarial environments. In Butenko, S., Murphey, R., Pardalos, P.M. (eds.) Cooperative Control: Models, Applications and Algorithms, pp. 95–110. Springer, Berlin (2003)

   Google Scholar 

7. Goodrich, M.A., et al.: Supporting wilderness search and rescue using a camera-equipped mini UAV: research articles. J. Field Robot. 25(1–2), 89–110 (2008)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Półka, M., Ptak, S., Kuziora, Ł., Kuczyńska, A.: The use of unmanned aerial vehicles by urban search and rescue groups. In Drones—Applications, pp. 83–95 (2018)

   Google Scholar 

9. Bebis, G., et al. (eds.): Advances in Visual Computing, vol. 9474. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)

   Google Scholar 

10. Silvagni, M., et al.: Multipurpose UAV for search and rescue operations in mountain avalanche events avalanche events, vol. 5705 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

11. Avezum, M., Seitz, A., Bruegge, B.: MODCAP : a platform for cooperative search and rescue missions (2019)

    Google Scholar 

12. S. K. B et al.: Towards highly reliable autonomy for urban search and rescue robots. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 118–129 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

13. Ghazali, S.N.A.M., Anuar, H.A., Alsagoff, S.N.S.Z., Yusoff, Z.: Determining position of target subjects in maritime search and rescue (MSAR) operations using rotary wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). In 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM), pp. 1–4 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

14. Rahmes, M., Chester, D., Hunt, J., Chiasson, B.: Optimizing cooperative cognitive search and rescue UAVs. In Autonomous Systems: Sensors, Vehicles, Security and the Internet of Everything (2018)

    Google Scholar 

15. Cui, J.Q., et al.: Drones for cooperative search and rescue in post-disaster situation. In 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), pp. 167–174 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

16. Phung, M.D., Quach, C.H., Dinh, T.H., Ha, Q.: Enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization path planning for UAV vision-based surface inspection. Autom. Construct. 81, 25–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Kallmann, M., Kapadia, M.: Geometric and discrete path planning for interactive virtual worlds. Synth. Lect. Vis. Comput. 8(1), 1–201 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Sujit, P.B., Saripalli, S., Sousa, J.B.: An evaluation of UAV path following algorithms. In 2013 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 3332–3337 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

19. Hernandez-Martinez, E.G., Ferreira-Vazquez, E.D., Fernandez-Anaya, G., Flores-Godoy, J.J.: Formation tracking of heterogeneous mobile agents using distance and area constraints. Complexity 2017, 1–13 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

20. Kamrani, F., Ayani, R.: UAV path planning in search operations. In Aerial Vehicles, InTech (2009)

    Google Scholar 

21. Besada-Portas, E., de la Torre, L., Moreno, A., Risco-Martín, J.L.: On the performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary UAV path planners. Inf. Sci. 238, 111–125 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Auñón, P.G., Peñas, M.S.: Use of genetic algorithms for unmanned aerial systems path planning. In Decision Making and Soft Computing—Proceedings of the 11th International FLINS Conference, FLINS 2014, pp. 430–435 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

23. Davoodi, M., Panahi, F., Mohades, A., Hashemi, S.N.: Multi-objective path planning in discrete space. Appl. Soft Comput. 13(1), 709–720 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Izzo, D.: Optimization of interplanetary trajectories for impulsive and continuous asteroid deflection. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30(2), 401–408 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Yang, P., Tang, K., Lozano, J.A.: Estimation of distribution algorithms based unmanned aerial vehicle path planner using a new coordinate system. In 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1469–1476 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

26. Ruz, J.J., Pajares, G., Jesus, M., Arevalo, O.: UAV trajectory planning for static and dynamic environments. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2009)

    Google Scholar 

27. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Seyfi-Shishavan, S.A., Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Farrokhizadeh, E., Donyatalab, Y., Kahraman, C.: Novel similarity measures in spherical fuzzy environment and their applications. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 94, 103837 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

29. Gündoǧdu, F.K., Kahraman, C.: Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36(1), 337–352 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. Chiclana, F., Tapia García, J.M., del Moral, M.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf. Sci. 221, 110–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

31. Garcia-Aunon, P., Peñas, M.S., de la Cruz García, J.M.: Parameter selection based on fuzzy logic to improve UAV path-following algorithms. J. Appl. Logic 24, 62–75 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

32. Valavanis, K.P., Vachtsevanos, G.J.: UAV mission and path planning: ıntroduction. In Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, pp. 1443–1446. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2015)

    Google Scholar 

33. Huang, C., et al.: A new dynamic path planning approach for unmanned aerial vehicles. Complexity 2018, 1–17 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

34. Fu, Z., Yu, J., Xie, G., Chen, Y., Mao, Y.: A heuristic evolutionary algorithm of UAV path planning. Wirel. Commun. Mobile Comput. 2018, 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

35. Kamranzad, F., Memarian, H., Zare, M.: Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9(7), 430 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

36. Salman, F.S., Gül, S.: Deployment of field hospitals in mass casualty incidents. Comput. Ind. Eng. 74(1), 37–51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references