[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Analysis and Comparison of Audiovisual Quality Assessment Datasets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computing Systems and Applications (CSA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 199))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Estimating perceived audiovisual quality by user is a vital component in many multimedia networks and applications. The need of ground truth data for quality assessment leads to elaboration of subjective quality assessment databases. Over the years, several datasets dedicated to audiovisual quality have been released in the public domain that are built upon extensive psychophysical experiences. In this paper, we study four audiovisual quality datasets: PLYM, TUM1080p50, VQEG MM2, and INRS. We also present detailed description of each dataset with the intention to facilitate their use for the researchers’ community. Moreover, different summarization tables have been reported in order to accomplish clear and fair comparison between the audiovisual quality databases. It is hoped that the present work will help researchers in selecting the appropriate databases for their experimentations on objective audiovisual quality metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akhtar, Z., Falk, T.H.: Audio-visual multimedia quality assessment: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Access 5, 21090–21117 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BT, R.I.R.: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Int. Telecommun. Union (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demirbilek, E.: Modèles d’apprentissage automatique d’estimation de qualité perçue dans les communications en temps réel/Machine learning based perceived quality estimation models in realtime communications. Ph.D. thesis, Université du Québec, Institut national de la recherche scientifique (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fliegel, K.: QUALINET multimedia databases v5. 0. Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Multimedia Technology Group (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goudarzi, M., Sun, L., Ifeachor, E.: Audiovisual quality estimation for video calls in wireless applications. In: 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010, pp. 1–5. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keimel, C., Redl, A., Diepold, K.: The TUM high definition video datasets. In: 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pp. 97–102. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pinson, M.H., et al.: The influence of subjects and environment on audiovisual subjective tests: an international study. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Sign. Proces. 6(6), 640–651 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rec, I.: P. 920: Interactive test methods for audiovisual communications. Int. Telecommun. Union (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rec, I.: P. 1401, methods, metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation, qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Recommendation, I.: P. 910, subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. Technical report, International Telecommunication Union (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Recommendation, I.: P. 913, methods for the subjective assessment of video quality, audio quality and audiovisual quality of internet video and distribution quality television in any environment. Int. Telecommun. Union (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saidi, I.: Analyse et modélisation de la qualité perçue des applications de visiophonie. Ph.D. thesis, INSA de Rennes (2018). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01977199

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima Boudjerida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boudjerida, F., Lahoulou, A., Akhtar, Z. (2021). Analysis and Comparison of Audiovisual Quality Assessment Datasets. In: Senouci, M.R., Boudaren, M.E.Y., Sebbak, F., Mataoui, M. (eds) Advances in Computing Systems and Applications. CSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 199. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69418-0_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics