[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

An Experimental Study of Operator Choices in the \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) Genetic Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research (MOTOR 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1275))

Abstract

We study the influence of the particular choice of operators on the running time of the recently proposed \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) genetic algorithm. In particular, we consider three choices for the mutation operator, six choices of the crossover operator, three strategies for sampling population sizes based on non-integer parameter values, and four choices of what to do when the best mutant is better than the parent.

We test all these 216 configurations on four optimization problems and in three adjustment flavours: the fixed \(\lambda \), the unlimited self-adjustment of \(\lambda \) and the logarithmically capped one. For each of these configurations, we consider both the default values of the hyperparameters and the ones produced by the irace parameter tuning tool.

The result of our experimental analysis showed that there exists a configuration that is robust on linear functions and is roughly two times faster compared to the initially proposed one and 12% faster on the OneMax problem compared to one of the similar previous studies. An even more robust configuration exists, which has a slightly worse performance on OneMax but is better on satisfiability problems. Such configurations can be the default choices for the practical evaluation of the \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) GA.

Supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation, agreement No. 17-71-20178.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Location: https://zenodo.org/record/3871043, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3871043.

References

  1. Bassin, A., Buzdalov, M.: The 1/5-th rule with rollbacks: on self-adjustment of the population size in the \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) GA. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 277–278 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07284

  2. Buzdalov, M., Doerr, B.: Runtime analysis of the \((1 + (\lambda , \lambda ))\) genetic algorithm on random satisfiable 3-CNF formulas. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1343–1350 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carvalho Pinto, E., Doerr, C.: Towards a more practice-aware runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00493

  4. Dang, N., Doerr, C.: Hyper-parameter tuning for the \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) GA. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 889–897 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doerr, B., Doerr, C.: Optimal static and self-adjusting parameter choices for the \((1+(\lambda,\lambda ))\) genetic algorithm. Algorithmica 80(5), 1658–1709 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0354-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Doerr, B., Doerr, C., Ebel, F.: From black-box complexity to designing new genetic algorithms. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 567, 87–104 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Doerr, B., Johannsen, D., Kötzing, T., Lehre, P.K., Wagner, M., Winzen, C.: Faster black-box algorithms through higher arity operators. In: Proceedings of Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, pp. 163–172 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doerr, B., Neumann, F., Sutton, A.M.: Improved runtime bounds for the (1+1) EA on random 3-CNF formulas based on fitness-distance correlation. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1415–1422 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman, B.W., Punch, W.F.: Parameter-less population pyramid. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 785–792 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrick, S., Selman, B.: Critical behavior in the satisfiability of random Boolean expressions. Science 264(5163), 1297–1301 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. López-Ibáñez, M., Dubois-Lacoste, J., Cáceres, L.P., Stützle, T., Birattari, M.: The irace package: iterated racing for automatic algorithm configuration. Oper. Res. Perspect. 3, 43–58 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, A.M., Neumann, F.: Runtime analysis of evolutionary algorithms on randomly constructed high-density satisfiable 3-CNF formulas. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Branke, J., Filipič, B., Smith, J. (eds.) PPSN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8672, pp. 942–951. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Buzdalov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bassin, A., Buzdalov, M. (2020). An Experimental Study of Operator Choices in the \((1+(\lambda ,\lambda ))\) Genetic Algorithm. In: Kochetov, Y., Bykadorov, I., Gruzdeva, T. (eds) Mathematical Optimization Theory and Operations Research. MOTOR 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58657-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58657-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58656-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58657-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics