Code Reusability and Transparency of Agent-Based Modeling: A Review from a Cyberinfrastructure Perspective

• An, L. (2012). Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 229, 25–36.

  Google Scholar 

• An, L., Linderman, M., Qi, J., Shortridge, A., & Liu, J. (2005). Exploring complexity in a human–environment system: An agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 54–79.

  Google Scholar 

• An, L., Mak, J., Yang, S., Lewison, R., Stow, D. A., Chen, H. L., et al. (2020). Cascading impacts of payments for ecosystem services in complex human-environment systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (JASSS), 23(1), 5.

  Google Scholar 

• An, L., Zvoleff, A., Liu, J., & Axinn, W. (2014). Agent-based modeling in coupled human and natural systems (CHANS): Lessons from a comparative analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(4), 723–745.

  Google Scholar 

• Atkins, D. E., Droegemeie, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., Messina, P., Ostriker, J. P., & Wright, M. H. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on Cyberinfrastructure.

  Google Scholar 

• Augusiak, J., Van den Brink, P. J., & Grimm, V. (2014). Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach. Ecological Modelling, 280, 117–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Becher, M. A., Grimm, V., Thorbek, P., Horn, J., Kennedy, P. J., & Osborne, J. L. (2014). BEEHAVE: A systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(2), 470–482.

  Google Scholar 

• Benenson, I., & Torrens, P. M. (2004). Geosimulation: Automata-based modeling of urban phenomena. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Bennett, D. A. (1997). A framework for the integration of geographical information systems and modelbase management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(4), 337–357.

  Google Scholar 

• Bennett, D. A., & Tang, W. (2006). Modelling adaptive, spatially aware, and mobile agents: Elk migration in Yellowstone. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(9), 1039–1066.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, D. G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., North, M., & Rand, W. (2005). Spatial process and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS. Journal of Geographic Systems, 7(1), 1–23.

  Google Scholar 

• Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, I. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Frakes, W., & Terry, C. (1996). Software reuse: Metrics and models. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 28(2), 415–435.

  Google Scholar 

• Frakes, W. B., & Kang, K. (2005). Software reuse research: Status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(7), 529–536.

  Google Scholar 

• Grimm, V., Augusiak, J., Focks, A., Frank, B. M., Gabsi, F., Johnston, A. S., et al. (2014). Towards better modelling and decision support: Documenting model development, testing, and analysis using TRACE. Ecological Modelling, 280, 129–139.

  Google Scholar 

• Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., et al. (2006). A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 198(1), 115–126.

  Google Scholar 

• Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., & Railsback, S. F. (2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221(23), 2760–2768.

  Google Scholar 

• Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., et al. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310(5750), 987–991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116681

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hauke, J., Lorscheid, I., & Meyer, M. (2017). Recent development of social simulation as reflected in JASSS between 2008 and 2014: A citation and co-citation analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(1).

  Google Scholar 

• Horni, A., Nagel, K., & Axhausen, K. W. (2016). The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim: Ubiquity press London.

  Google Scholar 

• Janssen, M. A. (2017). The practice of archiving model code of agent-based models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(1), 1–2.

  Google Scholar 

• Jin, X., Robinson, K., Lee, A., Polhill, J. G., Pritchard, C., & Parker, D. C. (2017). A prototype cloud-based reproducible data analysis and visualization platform for outputs of agent-based models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 96, 172–180.

  Google Scholar 

• Kang, J.-Y., Aldstadt, J., Michels, A., Vandewalle, R., & Wang, S. (2019). CyberGIS-Jupyter for spatially explicit agent-based modeling: a case study on influenza transmission. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on GeoSpatial simulation.

  Google Scholar 

• Kedron, P., Frazier, A. E., Trgovac, A. B., Nelson, T., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis.

  Google Scholar 

• Kim, I.-H., & Tsou, M.-H. (2013). Enabling digital earth simulation models using cloud computing or grid computing–two approaches supporting high-performance GIS simulation frameworks. International Journal of Digital Earth, 6(4), 383–403.

  Google Scholar 

• Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., et al. (2007a). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516.

  Google Scholar 

• Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., et al. (2007b). Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 639–649.

  Google Scholar 

• Lorscheid, I., Berger, U., Grimm, V., & Meyer, M. (2019). From cases to general principles: A call for theory development through agent-based modeling. Ecological Modelling, 393, 153–156.

  Google Scholar 

• Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST Special Publication, 800(145), 7.

  Google Scholar 

• Müller, B., Bohn, F., Dreßler, G., Groeneveld, J., Klassert, C., Martin, R., et al. (2013). Describing human decisions in agent-based models–ODD+ D, an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling & Software, 48, 37–48.

  Google Scholar 

• Niu, J., Tang, W., Xu, F., Zhou, X., & Song, Y. (2016). Global research on artificial intelligence from 1990–2014: Spatially-explicit Bibliometric analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(5), 66.

  Google Scholar 

• Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S., Breckler, S., et al. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425.

  Google Scholar 

• NRC. (2014). Advancing land change modeling: Opportunities and research requirements. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  Google Scholar 

• NSF. (2007). Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery. In: Report of NSF council, Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/ci_v5.pdf.

• O'Sullivan, D., Evans, T., Manson, S., Metcalf, S., Ligmann-Zielinska, A., & Bone, C. (2016). Strategic directions for agent-based modeling: Avoiding the YAAWN syndrome. Journal of Land Use Science, 11(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1030463

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 314–337.

  Google Scholar 

• Parry, H. R., & Bithell, M. (2012). Large scale agent-based modelling: A review and guidelines for model scaling. In A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See, & M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 271–308). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. E. (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design (Vol. 199). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Salecker, J., Sciaini, M., Meyer, K. M., & Wiegand, K. (2019). The nlrx R package: A next-generation framework for reproducible NetLogo model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1854–1863.

  Google Scholar 

• Schmolke, A., Thorbek, P., DeAngelis, D. L., & Grimm, V. (2010). Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: A strategy for the future. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(8), 479–486.

  Google Scholar 

• Schulze, J., Müller, B., Groeneveld, J., & Grimm, V. (2017). Agent-based Modelling of social-ecological systems: Achievements, challenges, and a way forward. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(2), 1–8.

  Google Scholar 

• Shook, E., Wang, S., & Tang, W. (2013). A communication-aware framework for parallel spatially explicit agent-based models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(11), 2160–2181.

  Google Scholar 

• Shook, E., Wren, C., Marean, C. W., Potts, A. J., Franklin, J., Engelbrecht, F., O'Neal, D., Janssen, M., Fisher, E., & Hill, K. (2015). Paleoscape model of coastal South Africa during modern human origins: progress in scaling and coupling climate, vegetation, and agent-based models on XSEDE. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2015 XSEDE conference: Scientific advancements enabled by enhanced Cyberinfrastructure.

  Google Scholar 

• Sommerville, I. (2016). Software engineering (10th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W. (2008). Simulating complex adaptive geographic systems: A geographically aware intelligent agent approach. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 35(4), 239–263.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W. (2013). Accelerating agent-based modeling using graphics processing units. In X. Shi, V. Kindratenko, & C. Yang (Eds.), Modern accelerator technologies for geographic information science (pp. 113–129). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., Bennett, D., & Wang, S. (2011). A parallel agent-based model of land use opinions. Journal of Land Use Science, 6(2–3), 121–135.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., & Bennett, D. A. (2010). Agent-based modeling of animal movement: A review. Geography Compass, 4(7), 682–700.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., & Bennett, D. A. (2011). Parallel agent-based modeling of spatial opinion diffusion accelerated using graphics processing units. Ecological Modelling, 222(19), 3605–3615.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., & Jia, M. (2014). Global sensitivity analysis of large agent-based modeling of spatial opinion exchange: A heterogeneous multi-GPU acceleration approach. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 104(3), 485–509.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., & Wang, S. (2009). HPABM: A hierarchical parallel simulation framework for spatially-explicit agent-based models. Transactions in GIS, 13(3), 315–333.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, W., & Yang, J. (2020). Agent-based land change modeling of a large watershed: Space-time locations of critical threshold. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23(1), 15.

  Google Scholar 

• Tesfatsion, L. (2002). Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up. Artificial Life, 8(1), 55–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Tesfatsion, L. (2017). Modeling economic systems as locally-constructive sequential games. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(4), 384–409.

  Google Scholar 

• Tesfatsion, L. (2020). Agent-based computational economics: homepage. http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/ace.htm.

• Thiele, J. C., & Grimm, V. (2015). Replicating and breaking models: Good for you and good for ecology. Oikos, 124(6), 691–696.

  Google Scholar 

• Towns, J., Cockerill, T., Dahan, M., Foster, I., Gaither, K., Grimshaw, A., et al. (2014). XSEDE: Accelerating scientific discovery. Computing in Science & Engineering, 16(5), 62–74.

  Google Scholar 

• Vandewalle, R., Kang, J.-Y., Yin, D., & Wang, S. (2019). Integrating CyberGIS-Jupyter and spatial agent-based modelling to evaluate emergency evacuation time. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on GeoSpatial simulation.

  Google Scholar 

• Vincenot, C. E. (2018). How new concepts become universal scientific approaches: Insights from citation network analysis of agent-based complex systems science. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 285(1874), 20172360.

  Google Scholar 

• Waddell, P., Borning, A., Ševčíková, H., & Socha, D. (2006). Opus (the open platform for urban simulation) and UrbanSim 4. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2006 international conference on digital government research, San Diego, California, USA.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilensky, U., & Evanston, I. (1999). NetLogo: Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

  Google Scholar 

• Wilson, G., Aruliah, D. A., Brown, C. T., Hong, N. P. C., Davis, M., Guy, R. T., et al. (2014). Best practices for scientific computing. PLoS Biology, 12(1), e1001745.

  Google Scholar 

• Yang, C., & Huang, Q. (2013). Spatial cloud computing: A practical approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zvoleff, A., & An, L. (2014). The effect of reciprocal connections between demographic decision making and land use on decadal dynamics of population and land-use change. Ecology and Society, 19(2).

  Google Scholar 

Download references