Abstract
Bridging formal and informal learning to enable students’ engaged learning is a core tenet of seamless learning. Addressing the limitations of the current studies on the innovative design and implementation of seamless learning scenarios, this chapter presents one well-designed and implemented curricular initiative at the primary school level, namely, “Mobilized 5E Science Curriculum” (M5ESC). The chapter first discusses the theoretical background of formal and informal learning, and of seamless learning, and then presents the context information of mobile technology for science education in Singapore, as well as the 5E (Engagement-Exploration-Explanation-Elaboration-Evaluation) instructional model. These serve as the design rationales for the M5ESC curricular innovation. Next, the description of M5ESC provides an overview of how the school designed curriculum for seamless learning supported by mobile technology, as well as how students and teachers responded to this innovation. The work reported here is intended to inform the curriculum design and implementation of the notion of seamless learning enabled by mobile technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, 63, 62–72.
Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2013). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5–6), 269–284.
Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2012). “GodMode is his video game name”: Situating learning and identity in structures of social practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 883–902.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Bybee, R. W. (2002). BSCS 5E instructional model. Colorado Springs: Biological Sciences Curriculum Study.
Chen, W., Tan, N. Y. L., Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., & Seow, P. S. K. (2008). Handheld computers as cognitive tools: Technology-enhanced environmental learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 231–252.
Chen, W., Seow, P., So, H. -J., Toh, Y., & Looi, C. -K. (2010). Extending students’ learning spaces: Technology-supported seamless learning. In S. R. Goldman, J. Pellegrino, K. Gomez, L. Lyons & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2010 (Part 1, pp. 484–491). Chicago: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Crane, V., Nicholson, H., Chen, M., & Bitgood, S. (1994). Informal science learning: What the research says about television, science museums, and community-based projects. Ephrata, PA: Science Press.
Csikszentmihályi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: What makes visitors want to learn? Museum News, 74(3), 35–62.
Curriculum Planning & Development Division of the Ministry of Education. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-2014.pdf
Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivist and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing Education, 33(6). Available online.
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190.
Greca, I. M., & Moreira, M. A. (2000). Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1–11.
Harwood, W. (2004). An activity model for scientific inquiry. The Science Teacher, 71(1), 44–46.
Holt-Reynolds, D. (2000). What does the teacher do? Constructivist pedagogies and prospective teachers’ beliefs about the role of a teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(1), 21–32.
Huang, Y.-M., Lin, Y.-T., & Cheng, S.-C. (2010). Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education, 54(1), 47–58.
Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.
Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.
Looi, C.-K., & Wong, L.-H. (2013). Designing for seamless learning. In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 146–157). New York: Routledge.
Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., et al. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132.
Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Wu, L., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L.-H., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2014). Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: Empirical study of learning effectiveness at scale. Computers & Education, 77, 101–115.
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76–85.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits (Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, P. Bell, B. Lewenstein, A. W. Shouse, & M. A. Feder, Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
Pea, R., & Maldonado, H. (2006). WILD for learning: Interacting through new computing devices anytime, anywhere. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 427–442). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Penuel, W. R., & Fishman, B. J. (2012). Large-scale science education intervention research we can use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 281–304.
Reilly, E. (2009). What is learning in a participatory culture? Retrieved August 13, 2014, from http://dmlcentral.net/sites/dmlcentral/files/resource_files/THSpring09WhatisLearning.pdf
Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–54.
Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1054–1067.
Sha, L., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., Seow, P., & Wong, L.-H. (2012). Recognizing and measuring self-regulated learning in a mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 718–728.
Sharples, M., Scanlon, E., Ainsworth, S., Anastopoulou, S., Collins, T., Crook, C., Jones, A., & O’Malley, C. (2014). Personal inquiry: Orchestrating science investigations within and beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 308–341.
Shih, J.-L., Chuang, C.-W., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50–62.
So, H. J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). Location matters: Leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2.0 technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 367–382.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.
Zimmerman, H. T. (2012). Participating in science at home: Recognition work and learning in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 597–630.
Acknowledgments
The paper is a part of work from the project “Bridging Formal and Informal Learning Spaces for Self-directed & Collaborative Inquiry Learning in Science” funded by Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF2011-EDU002-EL005). We would also like to thank Qualcomm Wireless Reach for their support of this research (2012–2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Looi, CK. et al. (2016). Bridging Formal and Informal Learning with the Use of Mobile Technology. In: Chai, C., Lim, C., Tan, C. (eds) Future Learning in Primary Schools. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-578-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-579-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)