[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Implementing the Instructional Model of Socioscientific Board Game in a General Education Course

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education

Part of the book series: Learning Sciences for Higher Education ((LSHE))

  • 697 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the design and implementation of a board game that involves social issues related to biological conservation and environmental resource management. The conceptual structure of the board game contains four perspectives, including ecological, economic, cultural, and political aspects of dealing with the issue of biodiversity. It also embraces the typical features of game mechanics such as goal orientation, role-playing, participatory simulation, feedback, and player interaction. The design of game elements has been reported in our previous studies. In this article, we intend to propose an instructional module for implementing socioscientific board games that helps teachers understand the design of game mechanics and the operating procedures of game-based instructions. To evaluate the applicability of the instructional module, a field implementation was conducted with 25 undergraduate students in a general education course regarding environmental studies. A variety of data including biodiversity concepts, social scientific reasoning, and gameplay behaviors were collected for evaluation purposes. The research findings will generate discussions on how this board game could act as a model of science teaching in authentic classroom settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 111.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 139.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 139.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: Defending and extending ‘science-in-context.’ Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 825–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappin, E. J. L., Bijvoet, X., & Oei, A. (2017). Teaching sustainability to a broad audience through an entertainment game—The effect of Catan: Oil Springs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 556–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers, and students. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-Y., Tsai, J.-C., Liu, S.-Y., & Chang, C.-Y. (2021). The effect of a scientific board game on improving creative problem solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100921

  • Cheng, P. H., Lee, W.-S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Modeling science board games. Science Education Monthly, 419, 20–38 [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. H., Yeh, T. K., Chao, Y. K., Lin, J., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Design ideas for an issue-situation-based board game involving multirole scenarios. Sustainability, 12(5), 2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, F., & Castellano, M. G. (2016). Board games and board game design as learning tools for complex scientific concepts: Some experiences. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziob, D. (2020). Board game in physics classes—A proposal for a new method of student assessment. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack, K. (2012). A climate change board game for interdisciplinary communication and education. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2–3), 328–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennewald, T. J., & Kievit-Kylar, B. (2013). Integrating climate change mechanics into a common pool resource game. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2–3), 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjællingsdal, K. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2020). Green across the board: Board games as tools for dialogue and simplified environmental communication. Simulation & Gaming, 51(5), 632–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. P. (2015). Transformative science teaching in higher education. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(2), 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., & Boltz, L. O. (2019). The fun of its parts: Design and player reception of educational board games. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 469–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W. M. (2018). Changes in primary students’ informal reasoning during an environment-related curriculum on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauren, H., Lutz, C., Wallon, R. C., & Hug, B. (2016). Integrating the dimensions of NGSS within a collaborative board game about honey bees. The American Biology Teacher, 78(9), 755–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, E. Z. F., & Chen, P. K. (2013). The effect of game-based learning on students’ learning performance in science learning—A case of ‘conveyance go.’ Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1044–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollin, G. (2017). The role of the teacher in game-based learning: A review and outlook. In M. Ma, A. Oikonomou, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 649–674). Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • New Media Consortium. (2005). The Horizon Report 2005. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2005/1/csd3737-pdf.pdf

  • Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., & Kinslow, A. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning (SSR) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 2981–3002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (2000). Why exotic species are not as bad as we fear. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(42), B7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonneaux, J., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Educational configurations for teaching environmental socioscientific issues within the perspective of sustainability. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.-C. (2020). The design and practice of a board game for socioscientific issues (Doctoral dissertation). Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.-C., Chen, S.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., & Liu, S.-Y. (2020). Element enterprise tycoon: Playing board games to learn chemistry in daily life. Education Sciences, 10, 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.-C., Cheng, P. H., Liu, S. Y., & Chang, C. Y. (2019). Using board games to teach socioscientific issues on biological conservation and economic development in Taiwan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 634–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J.-C., Liu, S.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., & Chen, S.-Y. (2021). Using a board game to teach about sustainable development. Sustainability, 13, 4942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., & Ninaus, M. (2018). Training computational thinking through board games: The case of Crabs & Turtles. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(2), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, M., & Simonneaux, L. (2011). Using companion modelling on authentic territories in the teaching of biodiversity. In A. Yarden & G. S. Carvalho (Eds.), Authenticity in biology education: Benefits and challenges (pp. 367–378). CIEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T. (2001). Game-theoretical perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K. D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 105–138). Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2016). A brief history of serious games. In R. Dörner, S. Göbel, M. Kickmeier-Rust, M. Masuch, & K. Zweig (Eds.), Entertainment computing and serious games (pp. 17–41). Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 61–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagal, J. P., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jen-Che Tsai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsai, JC., Liu, SY. (2022). Implementing the Instructional Model of Socioscientific Board Game in a General Education Course. In: Hsu, YS., Tytler, R., White, P.J. (eds) Innovative Approaches to Socioscientific Issues and Sustainability Education. Learning Sciences for Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1840-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1839-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1840-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics