[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Automation of Translating Unit-Level Verification Scenarios for Test Vector Generation of SoC

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Sustainable Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 333))

  • 867 Accesses

Abstract

System-on-chips (SoCs) incorporate a multitude of analog and digital circuit blocks with complex functionalities into a single chip. Verification of SoC designs is a humongous task executed by a large team over the course of a few months’ time frame. Prior to integration of each block to the SoC fabric, which is usually controlled by a processor, the block needs to be thoroughly verified for its functionality. Toward this, methodologies like Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) have enabled verification engineers to verify such complex designs with relative ease. While detailed verification of the individual modules is possible at the unit level, verification of all functionalities at the top level still remains a challenge. The limited number of tests run at SoC level is dwarfed by the large number of tests performed at unit levels. This is primarily due to the processor being driven by a software stimulus, while the unit tests with constrained-random verification are written as System Verilog UVM sequences. The real deficit comes when testing the manufactured device against functional specifications due to lack of sufficient tests for individual blocks. Achieving complete functional testing of SoC device is impossible without covering the verification space exercised by the stand-alone tests at unit level. In this paper, we propose a method to utilize the stand-alone functional test scenarios verified at unit level, by converting these scenarios into top-level functional tests that can be used to derive functional test vectors for testing the SoC device. Including these unit-level test scenarios into the top-level functional vectors increases the confidence on the device for its total functionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yun, Y.-N., et al.: Beyond UVM for practical SoC verification. In: International SoC Design Conference, pp. 158–162. Jeju, Korea (South) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, J., et al.: A UVM verification platform for RISC-V SoC from module to system level. In: IEEE 5th International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Microsystems, pp. 242–246. Nanjing, China (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salah, K.: A UVM-based smart functional verification platform: concepts, pros, cons, and opportunities. In: 9th International Design and Test Symposium, pp. 94–99. Algeries, Algeria (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Subramanyan, P., et al.: Template-based parameterized synthesis of uniform instruction-level abstractions for SoC verification. In: IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 37(8), pp. 1692–1705 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. El-Ashry, S., et al.: On error injection for NoC platforms: a UVM-based generic verification environment. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 39(5), 1137–1150 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, Y., et al.: A SPI interface module verification method based on UVM. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Technology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1219–1223. Chongqing, China (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaideep Varier, E.V., et al.: Design of generic verification procedure for IIC protocol in UVM. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Electronics Communication and Aerospace Technology, pp. 1146–1150. Coimbatore, India (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pavithran, T.M., et al.: UVM based testbench architecture for logic sub-system verification. In: IEEE International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy, Kollam, India (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chinchole, M., et al.: Functional verification of ten gigabytes media independent interface (XGMII) using universal verification methodology. In: 4th International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation, Pune, India (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hao, Y., et al.: A SWP interface module verification method based on UVM. In: IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Engineering, pp. 5–9. Xi'an, China (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goel, A., et al.: UVM based controller area network verification IP (VIP). In: International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication, pp. 645–652. Trichy, India (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vanaraj, A.T., et al.: Functional verification closure using optimal test scenarios for digital designs. In: Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology, pp. 535–538. Tirunelveli, India (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biswal, B.P., et al.: Cache coherency controller verification IP using SystemVerilog assertions and universal verification methodologies. In: International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control, pp. 21–24. Coimbatore, India (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elakkiya, C., et al.: Functional coverage—driven UVM based JTAG verification. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Coimbatore, India (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Munir, A., et al.: Fast reliable verification methodology for RISC-V without a reference model. In: 19th International Workshop on Microprocessor and SOC Test Security and Verification (MTV), pp. 12–17. Austin USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liao, W.-S., et al.: FVP: A formal verification platform for SoC. In: IEEE International SOC Conference, pp. 21–24. Portland, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roy, S.K.: Top level SOC interconnectivity verification using formal techniques. In: International Workshop on Microprocessor Test and Verification, pp. 63–70. Austin, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saafan, H., et al.: SoC connectivity specification extraction using incomplete RTL design: an approach for formal connectivity verification. In: 11th International Design & Test Symposium (IDT), pp. 110–114. Hammamet, Tunisia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zorian, Y.: Addressing test challenges in advanced technology nodes. In: IEEE 21st Asian Test Symposium, Niigata, Japan (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salemi, R.: The UVM Primer: An Introduction to the Universal Verification Methodology, 1st edn. Boston Light Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Anilkumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anilkumar, R., Varaprasad, B.K.S.V.L., Padmapriya, K. (2022). Automation of Translating Unit-Level Verification Scenarios for Test Vector Generation of SoC. In: Nagar, A.K., Jat, D.S., Marín-Raventós, G., Mishra, D.K. (eds) Intelligent Sustainable Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 333. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6309-3_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics