[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Social Impact Theory-Based Node Placement Strategy for Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Abstract

The network density, energy consumption, and connectivity are the most important design parameters for a self-organizing wireless sensor network. This paper presents a social impact theory-based multi-objective strategy for optimizing these parameters. The proposed strategy optimizes the clustering schemes and signal strengths along with the operational modes of the sensor nodes. The algorithm has been implemented in MATLAB using an open source social impact theory Optimization toolbox (http://mloss.org/software/view/457/). The suggested algorithm offers the achievement of optimal designs and satisfies the different design parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 143.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 179.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yick, J., B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal, Wireless sensor network survey. Computer Networks, 2008. 52(12): p. 2292–2330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rawat, P., et al., Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2014. 68(1): p. 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ishizuka, M. and M. Aida. Performance study of node placement in sensor networks. in Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2004. Proceedings. 24th International Conference on. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Izadi, D., J. Abawajy, and S. Ghanavati, An Alternative Node Deployment Scheme for WSNs. Sensors Journal, IEEE, 2015. 15(2): p. 667–675.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhondekar, A.P., et al., A multiobjective Fuzzy Inference System based deployment strategy for a distributed mobile sensor network. Sensors & Transducers, 2010. 114(3): p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Viani, F., et al. Pervasive remote sensing through WSNs. in Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), 2012 6th European Conference on. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, K.T., et al. An energy efficient and optimal randomized clustering for wireless sensor networks. in Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD), 2015 16th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shafali, et al. An algorithm to minimize energy consumption using nature-inspired technique in wireless sensor network. in Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), 2015 International Conference on. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Srbinovski, B., et al. Energy aware adaptive sampling algorithm for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. in Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2015 IEEE. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slijepcevic, S. and M. Potkonjak. Power efficient organization of wireless sensor networks. in Communications, 2001. ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamachari, B. and F. Ordonez. Analysis of energy-efficient, fair routing in wireless sensor networks through non-linear optimization. in Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Fall. 2003 IEEE 58th. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, C. and B. Krishnamachari. Localized topology generation mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM ‘03. IEEE. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, S.Y. and Y.F. Li, Automatic sensor placement for model-based robot vision. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 2004. 34(1): p. 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alageswaran, R., et al. Design and implementation of dynamic sink node placement using Particle Swarm Optimization for life time maximization of WSN applications. in Advances in Engineering, Science and Management (ICAESM), 2012 International Conference on. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deif, D.S. and Y. Gadallah, Classification of Wireless Sensor Networks Deployment Techniques. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 2014. 16(2): p. 834–855.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dondi, D., et al., Modeling and Optimization of a Solar Energy Harvester System for Self-Powered Wireless Sensor Networks. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 2008. 55(7): p. 2759–2766.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elshaikh, M., et al. Energy consumption optimization with Ichi Taguchi method for Wireless Sensor Networks. in Electronic Design (ICED), 2014 2nd International Conference on. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hortos, W.S. Bio-inspired, cross-layer protocol design for intrusion detection and identification in wireless sensor networks. in Local Computer Networks Workshops (LCN Workshops), 2012 IEEE 37th Conference on. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolega, E., V. Vescoukis, and D. Voutos. Assessment of network simulators for real world WSNs in forest environments. in Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Menon, K.A.U., D. Maria, and H. Thirugnanam. Power optimization strategies for wireless sensor networks in coal mines. in Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), 2012 Ninth International Conference on. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamaddoust, R., et al. Designing the Lighting Control System Based on WSN with Optimization of Decision Making Algorithm. in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), 2010 International Conference on. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iram, R., et al. Computational intelligence based optimization in wireless sensor network. in Information and Communication Technologies (ICICT), 2011 International Conference on. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lejiang, G., et al. WSN Cluster Head Selection Algorithm Based on Neural Network. in Machine Vision and Human-Machine Interface (MVHI), 2010 International Conference on. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Payal, A., C.S. Rai, and B.V.R. Reddy. Artificial Neural Networks for developing localization framework in Wireless Sensor Networks. in Data Mining and Intelligent Computing (ICDMIC), 2014 International Conference on. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Serpen, G., et al. WSN-ANN: Parallel and distributed neurocomputing with wireless sensor networks. in Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2013 International Joint Conference on. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singh, P. and S. Agrawal. TDOA Based Node Localization in WSN Using Neural Networks. in Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 2013 International Conference on. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Subha, C.P., S. Malarkan, and K. Vaithinathan. A survey on energy efficient neural network based clustering models in wireless sensor networks. in Emerging Trends in VLSI, Embedded System, Nano Electronics and Telecommunication System (ICEVENT), 2013 International Conference on. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wen-Tsai, S., et al. Enhance the efficient of WSN data fusion by neural networks training process. in Computer Communication Control and Automation (3CA), 2010 International Symposium on. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Macaš, M., L. Lhotská, and V. Křemen, Social Impact based Approach to Feature Subset Selection, in Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2007), N. Krasnogor, et al., Editors. 2008, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bhondekar, A.P., et al., A novel approach using Dynamic Social Impact Theory for optimization of impedance-Tongue (iTongue). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2011. 109(1): p. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaur, R., et al., Enhancing electronic nose performance: A novel feature selection approach using dynamic social impact theory and moving window time slicing for classification of Kangra orthodox black tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2012. 166–167: p. 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Macaš, M., et al., Binary social impact theory based optimization and its applications in pattern recognition. Neurocomputing, 2014. 132: p. 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaur, R., et al., Human opinion dynamics: An inspiration to solve complex optimization problems. Sci. Rep., 2013. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Latané, B., The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 1981. XXXVI (4): p. 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latané, From private attitude to public opinion: a dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 1990. 97(3): p. 362–376.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bhondekar, A.P., et al. Genetic Algorithm Based Node Placement Methodology For Wireless Sensor Networks. in International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. 2009. Hong Kong: IAENG.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferentinos, K.P. and T.A. Tsiligiridis, Adaptive design optimization of wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithms. Computer Networks, 2007. 51(4): p. 1031–1051.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavita Kumari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kavita Kumari, Shruti Mittal, Rishemjit Kaur, Ritesh Kumar, Aulakh, I.K., Bhondekar, A.P. (2016). Social Impact Theory-Based Node Placement Strategy for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Satapathy, S., Bhatt, Y., Joshi, A., Mishra, D. (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 438. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0767-5_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0767-5_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0766-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0767-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics