The Corpus of Interactional Data: A Large Multimodal Annotated Resource

1. Allwood, J., Cerrato, L.: A study of gestural feedback expressions. In: First Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication, pp. 7–22 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

2. Allwood, J., Cerrato, L., Dybkjaer, L., Jokinen, K., Navaretta, C., Paggio, P.: The MUMIN Multimodal Coding Scheme, pp. 129–157. NorFA yearbook 2005 (2005)

   Google Scholar 

3. Anderson, A.H., Bader, M., Gurman Bard, E., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H.S., Weinert, R.: The hcrc map task corpus. Lang. Speech 34, 351–366 (1991)

   Google Scholar 

4. Bertrand, R., Portes, C., Sabio, F.: Distribution syntaxique, discursive et interactionnelle des contours intonatifs du français dans un corpus de conversation. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, p. 47 (2007)

   Google Scholar 

5. Blache, P., Rauzy, S.: Influence de la qualité de l’étiquetage sur le chunking : une corrélation dépendant de la taille des chunks. In: Actes de Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, pp. 290–299. Avignon, France (2008)

   Google Scholar 

6. Boersma, P., Weenink, D.: Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer, version 3.4. Technical Report 132, Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam (1996)

   Google Scholar 

7. Bull, P.E.: Posture and gesture. In: International Series in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 16 (1987)

   Google Scholar 

8. Carletta, J.: Announcing the ami meeting corpus. The ELRA Newsletter 11(1), (2006)

   Google Scholar 

9. Carletta, J., Isard, A.: The mate annotation workbench: user requirements. In: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop: Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging (1999)

   Google Scholar 

10. Carletta, J., Evert, S., Heid, U., Kilgour, J., Robertson, J., Voormann, H.: The nite xml toolkit: flexible annotation for multi-modal language data. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 35(3), (2003)

    Google Scholar 

11. Carletta, J.C.: Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput. Linguist. 22(2), 249–254 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

12. Carpenter, B.: The Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

13. Caspers, J.: Local speech melody as a limiting factor in the turn-taking system in dutch. J. Phon. 31, 251–276 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Clark, H.H., Wasow, T.: Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 201–242 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

15. Di Cristo, A.: Vers une modélisation de l’accentuation en français. deuxième partie : le modèle. J. Fr. Lang. Stud. 10, 27–44 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Dister, A.: La notation subjective de la pause constitue-t-elle un bon indice pour le découpage de corpus oraux ?. In: Constant, M., Dister, A., Emirkanian, L., Piron, S. (eds.) Description linguistique pour le traitement automatique du français, Cahiers du Cental 5, pp. 165–186. Louvain-la-Neuve, Presses universitaires de Louvain (2008)

    Google Scholar 

17. Fohr, D., Mella, O., Cerisara, C., Illina, I.: The automatic news transcription system: ants, some real time experiments. In: INTERSPEECH-2004, pp. 377–380 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

18. Fox Tree, J.E.: Listening in on monologues and dialogues. Discourse Process. 27(1), 35–53 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Gendner, V., Illouz, G., Jardino, M., Monceaux, L., Paroubek, P., Robba, I., Vilnat, A.: PEAS, the first instantiation of a comparative framework for evaluating parsers of french. In: Research Notes of EACL 2003, Budapest, Hongrie (2003)

    Google Scholar 

20. Guénot, M.L.: Parsing de loral : traiter les disfluences. In: Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles, TALN, 6-10 June 2005. Dourdan, France (2005)

    Google Scholar 

21. Henry, S., Pallaud, B.: Word fragments and repeats in spontaneous spoken French. In: Eklund, R. (ed.) Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, Proceedings of DiSS03, 5-8 September 2003, pp. 77–80. Göteborg University, Sweden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

22. Hirst, D.: A praat plugin for momel and intsint with improved algorithms for modelling and coding intonation. In: ICPhS XVI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

23. Hirst, D., Di Cristo, A., Espesser, R.: Levels of representation and levels of analysis for intonation. In: Horne, M. (ed.) Prosody: Theory and Experiment, pp. 51–87. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2000)

    Google Scholar 

24. Ide, N., Bonhomme, P., Romary, L.: Xces: an xml-based standard for linguistic corpora. In: Proceedings of the Second Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pp. 825–830 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

25. Jun, S.A., Fougeron, C.: A phonological model of french intonation. In: Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology, pp. 209–242. Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

26. Kendon, A.: Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol. 26, 22–63 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Kipp, M.: Anvil - a generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), pp. 1367–1370 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

28. Kipp, M., Neff, M., Albrecht, I.: An annotation scheme for conversational gestures: how to economically capture timing and form. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on “Multimodal Corpora” at LREC 2007, pp. 325–339 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

29. Koiso, H., Horiuchi, Y., Ichikawa, A., Den, Y.: An analysis of turn-taking and backchannels based on prosodic and syntactic features in japanese map task dialogs. Language and Speech, 41 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

30. Kruijff-Korbayova, I., Gerstenberger, C., Rieser, V., Schehl, J.: The sammie multimodal dialogue corpus meets the nite xml toolkit. In: proceedings of LREC06 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

31. McNeill, D.: Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. University of Chicago Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

32. McNeill, D.: Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

33. Michelas, A.: Caractérisation phonétique et phonologique du syntagme intermédiaire en français: de la production à la perception. Ph.D. thesis, Aix-Marseille Université (2011)

    Google Scholar 

34. Muller, P., Vergez, M., Prévot, L., Asher, N., Benamara, F., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., Vieu, L.: Manuel d’annotation en relations de discours du projet annodis. Technical report, CLLE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

35. Pallaud, B.: Troncations de mots, reprises et interruption syntaxique en français parlé spontané. In: JADT, 8èmes Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, 20–22 avril 2006, pp. 707–715. Besançon (2006)

    Google Scholar 

36. Pallaud, B., Henry, S.: Amorces de mots et répétitions : des hésitations plus que des erreurs en français parlé. In: Le poids des mots. Actes des 7èmes Journées Internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, Louvain-la-Neuve, 10-12 mars 2004. vol. 2, pp. 848–858. Louvain, PUL(2004)

    Google Scholar 

37. Paroubek, P., Robba, I., Vilnat, A., Ayache, C.: Data annotations and measures in EASY the evaluation campaign for parsers in french. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 314–320. Genoa, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

38. Pineda, L.A., Massé, A., Meza, I., Salas, M., Schwarz, E., Uraga, E., Villaseñor, L.: The dime project. In: Proceedings of MICAI2002, vol. 2313. LNAI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

39. Portes, C., Bertrand, R.: Some cues about the interactional value of the \(\ll \)continuation\(\gg \) contour in french. In: Discours et Prosodie comme Interface Complexe (2006)

    Google Scholar 

40. Post, B.: Tonal and Phrasal Structures in French Intonation. Thesus (2000)

    Google Scholar 

41. Rodriguez, K., Dipper, S., Götze, M., Poesio, M., Riccardi, G., Raymond, C., Rabiega-Wisniewska, J.: Standoff coordination for multi-tool annotation in a dialogue corpus. In: Proceedings of Linguistic Annotation Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

42. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. Schegloff, E.: Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

44. Schmidt, T., Duncan, S., Ehmer, O., Hoyt, J., Kipp, M., Loehr, D., Magnusson, M., Rose, T., Sloetjes, H.: An exchange format for multimodal annotations. In: Kipp, M., Martin, J.-C., Paggio, P., Heylen, D. (eds.) Multimodal Corpora: From Models of Natural Interaction to Systems and Applications, pp. 207–221. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

45. Shriberg, E.E.: Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfluencies. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

46. Shriberg, E.E.: Acoustic properties of disfluent repetitions. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 384–387. Stockholm, Sweden (1995)

    Google Scholar 

47. Shriberg, E.E.: Phonetic consequences of speech disfluency. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Phonetic Science, pp. 619–622. San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

48. Wagner, A.: Unity in diversity: integrating differing linguistic data in tusnelda. In: Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, pp. 1–20 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

49. Ward, N.: Using prosodic clues to decide when to produce back-channel utterances. In: 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pp. 1724–1727 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

50. Ward, N., Tsukahara, W.: Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in english and japanese. J. Pragmat. 23, 1177–1207 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references