Abstract
Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is a three-dimensional imaging technique. The data obtained during image acquisition, however, are not immediately evident to the radiologist, as the huge amount of digital information acquired is used to reconstruct three-dimensional images of the coronary arteries, according to dedicated and complex software and protocols. The coronary arteries are tortuous, moving objects and are thus often not easily visualized. For this reason, in CTA the movements of these arteries must be “frozen,” through cardiosynchronization, during image acquisition.
In order to visualize the coronary arteries in CTA, a very high density of the internal lumen must be created. As specified in the previous chapter, this is accomplished by the dynamic injection of contrast agent. The vessels become evident because of the large difference in the density of the vessel lumen (high density: 300–500 HU, due to the iodine content of the blood during passage of contrast agent) and that of the surrounding tissues, such as epicardial fat (low density: −50–100 HU). The difference is important because during three-dimensional image reconstruction only structures with a very high density will be clearly visualized. The higher the density, the more evident the anatomic structures will be. This is the reason why the first three-dimensional images presented for clinical use were related to bone, a structure with a very high radiologic density.
Starting from volume data, there are two ways to construct three-dimensional images of the anatomic structures of interest: the first is to explore the volume using curved or orthogonal bi-dimensional planes with so-called planimetric technique; the second is to consider and image the entire package of three-dimensional data, using so-called volumetric techniques. In this chapter, we offer a simple explanation of the difference in these visualization techniques and their relative importance in clinical use for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Araoz PA, Kirsch J, Primak AN, Braun NN, Saba O, Williamson EE, Harmsen WS, Mandrekar JN, McCollough CH. Optimal image reconstruction phase at low and high heart rates in dual-source CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec;25(8):837–45
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography. An increasing source of radiation exposure}. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Diederichs CG, Keating DP, Glatting G, Oestmann JW: Blurring of vessels in spiral CT angiography: effects of collimation width, pitch, viewing plane, and windowing in maximum intensity projection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:965–974
Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G, Zwerner PL, Doll J, Nielsen CD, Flohr TG, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):121–9. Epub 2007 May 10. PubMed PMID: 17495177
Matsuura N, Horiguchi J, Yamamoto H, Hirai N, Tonda T, Kohno N, Ito K. Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner: least interscan variability and least motion artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jun;190(6):1561–8. PubMed PMID: 18492907
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pavone, P. (2013). Image Reconstruction. In: Dowe, D.A., Fioranelli, M., Pavone, P. (eds) Imaging Coronary Arteries. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2682-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2682-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2681-0
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2682-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)