[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Dual-Energy CT for Urinary Stone Evaluation

  • NEW IMAGING TECHNIQUES (S Rais-Bahrami and K Porter, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Conventional CT imaging is an excellent tool for the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis however is limited in its ability to detect stone composition. Dual-energy CT (DECT) scans have demonstrated promise in overcoming this limitation. We review the current utility of DECT in nephrolithiasis.

Recent Findings

DECT is superior to conventional CT in differentiating uric acid stones from non-uric acid stones, with numerous studies reporting sensitivities and specificities approaching > 95%. Dose reduction protocols incorporating low-dose CT scans are commonly used, providing significantly lower effective radiation doses compared to conventional CT. DECT remains an effective diagnostic tool in patients with large body habitus.

Summary

DECT can accurately detect uric acid stones, which can help guide which stones may be suitable to medical dissolution. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of DECT in guiding management of patients with nephrolithiasis can help to promote its widespread use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Smith RC, Verga M, Mccarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1):97–101. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fulgham PF, Assimos DG, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1203–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang H, Dai J, Holt S, Sorensen M, Sternberg K, Harper J. National imaging trends for acute kidney stone disease: do renal ultrasounds for nephrolithiasis in the emergency department pave the way to computerized tomography? J Urol. 2018;199:e683–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fwu CW, Eggers PW, Kimmel PL, Kusek JW, Kirkali Z. Emergency department visits, use of imaging, and drugs for urolithiasis have increased in the United States. Kidney Int. 2013;83(3):479–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology. 2000;55(6):816–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00518-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shahnani PS, Karami M, Astane B, Janghorbani M. The comparative survey of Hounsfield units of stone composition in urolithiasis patients. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(7):650–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ngo TC, Assimos DG. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: recent progress and future directions. Rev Urol. 2007;9(1):17–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mansouri M, Aran S, Singh A, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV, Lev MH, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography characterization of urinary calculi: basic principles, applications and concerns. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015;44(6):496–500. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grajo JR, Patino M, Prochowski A, Sahani DV. Dual energy CT in practice: basic principles and applications. Appl Radiol. 2016;45:6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andrabi Y, Patino M, Das CJ, Eisner B, Sahani DV, Kambadakone A. Advances in CT imaging for urolithiasis. Indian J Urol. 2015;31(3):185–93. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.156924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, Sella D, Ibrahim E, Thiel DD, Leng S, et al. Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of urinary calculi: image interpretation, pitfalls and stone mimics. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(12):e707–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.07.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spek A, Strittmatter F, Graser A, Kufer P, Stief C, Staehler M. Dual energy can accurately differentiate uric acid-containing urinary calculi from calcium stones. World J Urol. 2016;34(9):1297–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1756-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lombardo F, Bonatti M, Zamboni GA, et al. Uric acid versus non-uric acid renal stones: in vivo differentiation with spectral CT. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(6):490–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.018Attenuation ratios were created to help accurately predict uric acid stones from non-uric acid stones.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonatti M, Lombardo F, Zamboni GA, et al. Renal stones composition in vivo determination: comparison between 100/Sn140 kV dual-energy CT and 120 kV single-energy CT. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(3):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0905-6DECT was directly compared with single energy CT, and the accuracy of stone composition was significantly higher with DECT (90 versus 52%, respectively).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wisenbaugh ES, Paden RG, Silva AC, Humphreys MR. Dual-energy vs conventional computed tomography in determining stone composition. Urology. 2014;83(6):1243–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.12.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nestler T, Nestler K, Neisius A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a prospective trial and protocol for clinical implementation. World J Urol. 2019;37(4):735–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2430-4This study demonstrated that the accuracy of DECT in detecting stone composition can be enhanced by incorporating urinary pH.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG. Ibrahim el-SH, Morin RL, Haley WE, Thiel DD. In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2015;29(2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Apfaltrer G, Dutschke A, Baltzer PAT, et al. Substantial radiation dose reduction with consistent image quality using a novel low-dose stone composition protocol. World J Urol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03082-6A novel low-dose CT protocol combining a 150 kV spectral filtration unenhanced protocol and a stone-targeted DECT was able to reduce radiation exposure by 25% compared to typical DECT protocols.

  19. Li X, Zhao R, Liu B, Yu Y. Gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy computed tomography: a novel technique to determine urinary stone composition. Urology. 2013;81(4):727–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Investig Radiol. 2008;43(2):112–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318157a144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(12):1441–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2007.09.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang GM, Sun H, Xue HD, Xiao H, Zhang XB, Jin ZY. Prospective prediction of the major component of urinary stone composition with dual-source dual-energy CT in vivo. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(11):1178–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas C, Patschan O, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, et al. Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(6):1553–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1300-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dewes P, Frellesen C, Scholtz JE, Fischer S, Vogl TJ, Bauer RW, et al. Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease - impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(6):1058–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kordbacheh H, Baliyan V, Uppot RN, Eisner BH, Sahani DV, Kambadakone AR. Dual-source dual-energy ct in detection and characterization of urinary stones in patients with large body habitus: observations in a large cohort. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):796–801. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20293This study demonstrated DECT provided acceptable image quality and was able to characterize stones in patients with large body habitus.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kordbacheh H, Baliyan V, Singh P, Eisner BH, Sahani DV, Kambadakone AR. Rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus: preliminary observations on image quality and stone characterization. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(3):1019–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1808-5Although DECT was accurate in detecting stone composition for patients with large body habitus, stone size and patient weight were found to be independent predictors of stone composition with DECT.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qu M, Jaramillo-Alvarez G, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Liu Y, Duan X, Wang J, et al. Urinary stone differentiation in patients with large body size using dual-energy dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(5):1408–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2727-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Largo R, Stolzmann P, Fankhauser CD, Poyet C, Wolfsgruber P, Sulser T, et al. Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study. Urolithiasis. 2016;44(3):271–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0824-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jepperson MA, Thiel DD, Cernigliaro JG, Broderick GA, Parker AS, Haley WE. Determination of ureter stent appearance on dual-energy computed tomography scan. Urology. 2012;80(5):986–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Magistro G, Bregenhorn P, Krauß B, et al. Optimized management of urolithiasis by coloured stent-stone contrast using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):29. Published 2019 Apr 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0459-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(4):927–33. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008;28(2):161–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/28/2/R02.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Franken A, Gevenois PA, Muylem AV, Howarth N, Keyzer C. In vivo differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid urinary calculi with third-generation dual-source dual-energy ct at reduced radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):358–63. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18091This study demonstrated that a limitation of low-dose DECT protocols is that a larger proportion of stones < 5 mm cannot be accurately characterized as UA versus non-UA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Frey C. Kidney stones: ultrasound beats CT scan in radiation exposure, cost; tighter glycemic control in people with diabetes decreases risk. In: American Urological Association. 2014. http://auanet.mediaroom.com/2014-05-17-Kidney-Stones-Ultrasound-Beats-CT-Scan-in-Radiation-Exposure-Cost-Tighter-Glycemic-Control-in-People-with-Diabetes-Decreases-Risk?articleNo=369. Accessed 1 May 2020.

  35. Pearson D. Dual-energy CT: is it what the doctor ordered for the cost-conscious community hospital? In: Radiology Business. 2019. https://www.radiologybusiness.com/sponsored/1081/topics/healthcare-economics/dual-energy-ct-it-what-doctor-ordered-cost-conscious. Accessed 1 Jun 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin I. Friedlander.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. Dr. Friedlander reports personal fees from Retrophin, outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Imaging Techniques

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nourian, A., Ghiraldi, E. & Friedlander, J.I. Dual-Energy CT for Urinary Stone Evaluation. Curr Urol Rep 22, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01019-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-020-01019-5

Keywords

Navigation