[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Energy Consumption Prediction of Steelmaking Process Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm and Stochastic Configuration Network

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To solve the problems of energy consumption, a prediction model based on an improved whale swarm optimization algorithm and stochastic configuration network (LWOA-SCN) is proposed. The advantage of the model is that the hidden layer structure can be generated adaptively according to the training effect and is characterized by strong generalization performance, fast convergence, high prediction accuracy, and the ability to jump out of local optimality. First, we used principal component analysis, mechanistic model derivation, and SPSS correlation analysis to determine the main influencing factors of the three sub-models. Second, LWOA was used in combination with a stochastic configuration network to establish the oxygen consumption model, gas recovery model, and steam recovery model. To verify the prediction effect of the model, it was compared and analyzed with BP (back propagation), RBF (radial basis function neural network), and SVM (support vector machines) prediction models. Finally, the LWOA-SCN model was tested in industrial production; the results showed that the hit rates (within ± 5 m3/ton) of models for oxygen consumption, gas recovery, and steam recovery were 91.08%, 92.14%, and 92.27%, respectively, and simultaneous hit rate was 85.71%. Those verify that the models can meet the actual demand of energy consumption prediction in a steel mill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Kermeli, W.H.J. Graus, and E. Worrell, Energ. Effic. 76, 987 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-014-9267-5 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Wu, Y.C. Hu, Y.J. Chiu, and S.J. Tsao, Environ Dev Sustain. 25, 4173 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02238-1 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C.L. Zhang and S.F. Ding, Knowl-Based Syst. 220, 106924 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106924 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Wang, C. Gao, X.G. Ai, B.P. Zhai, and S.L. Li, Trans Indian. I. Metals. 75, 2281 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02603-8 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Zhu, B.C. Han, K. Dong, and G.S. Wei, Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 27, 1421 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Li, B. Sandip, M. Sankha, and C. Kinnor, Metals 12, 268 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Dana, P. Alena, F. Peter, B. Branislav, and D. Peter, Metals. 8, 844 https://doi.org/10.3390/met81008444 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Li, C.L. Yang, W. Wang, and J.F. Qiao, Inf. Sci. 622, 148 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.134 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Dorota, S. Magdalena, K. Marek, and S. Stanislaw, Mater. 15, 5054 https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15145054 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Li, Y.D. He, J.G. Ding, F. Luan, and D.H. Zhang, Inf. Sci. 611, 677 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.173 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D.Y. Wen, Y.T. Zhu, and J. Phys, Conf. Ser 2010, 012138 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2010/1/012138 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X.H. Tian, F. Luan, X. Li, Y. Wu, and N. Chen, J. Intell. & Fuzzy Syst. 43, 7297 https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-221338 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Deng, Z.W. Ye, W.H. Cai, M.W. Wang, A.X. Zhang, W. Zhou, Z.M. Wei, and D.X. Zhu, IJDWM 18, 1 https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDWM.308817 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C.Y. Pan, J.X. Xu, and Y.P. Weng, J. Instrum. 42, 219 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.Y. Shi, B.S. Wang, J. Chen, R.X. Zhong, S.Y. Guo, P. Sun, and Z.C. Ma, Metals. 12, 1589 https://doi.org/10.3390/met12101589 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X.L. Zong, J.J. Liu, Z.W. Ye, and Y. Liu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 33, 10 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183122501388 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y.P. Liao and X.Y. Chen, J. Supercomput. 77, 9642 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11227-021-03660-4 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X.M. Wu and L. Mou, For. Electron. Meas. Technol. 41, 105 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Ma, J. Du, Z.J. Li, and F. Liu, Eng. Technol. Res. 06, 36 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Dorota, S. Magdalena, K. Marek, and S. Stanislaw, Mater. 15, 5054 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the natural science fund program projects of the Department of Science & Technology of Liaoning Province in 2022 (2022-BS-297), the basic scientific research fund projects of the Educational Department of Liaoning Province in 2021 (LJKZ1071), Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology doctoral research initiation fund project in 2023 (2307B04) and Liaoning Natural Science Foundation (2022-MS-365).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chunyang Shi and Baoshuai Wang have contributed equally to this project.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, Benxi, 117004, China

    Chunyang Shi, Baoshuai Wang, Shiyu Guo, Peng Sun, Zhicai Ma, Yikun Wang & Lei Zhang

  2. School of Metallurgy Engineering, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, Benxi, 117004, China

    Chunlei Wu

Authors
  1. Chunyang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baoshuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiyu Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peng Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhicai Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yikun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chunlei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunyang Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, C., Wang, B., Guo, S. et al. Energy Consumption Prediction of Steelmaking Process Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm and Stochastic Configuration Network. JOM 75, 4320–4331 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-06019-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-06019-7