[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Green Computing in WAN Through Intensified Teredo IPv6 Tunneling to Route Multifarious Symmetric NAT

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IPv4–IPv6 transition rolls out numerous challenges to the world of Internet as the Internet is drifting from IPv4 to IPv6. IETF recommends few transition techniques which includes Dual stack, translation and tunneling. By means of tunneling the IPv6 packets over IPv4 UDP, Teredo maintains IPv4/IPv6 Dual stack node in isolated IPv4 networks behindhand Network Address Translation (NAT). However, the proposed tunneling protocol works with the symmetric and asymmetric NAT. In order to make a Teredo support several symmetric NATs along with several asymmetric NAT, we propose Multifarious Sym Teredo, which is an extension of Teredo with a capability of navigating through several symmetric NAT using Graphical Network Simulator 3. The work preserves the Teredo architecture and also offers a backward compatibility with the original Teredo protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quynh Anh, N., & Minh Nguyen, N. P. (2012). Transition from IPv4 to IPv6: Best transition method for large enterprise networks.

  2. Durand, A. (2001). Deploying ipv6. Internet Computing, IEEE, 5(1), 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Phu, N. M., Nguyen, Q. A., Rantapuska, T., Utriainen, J., & Matilainen, M. (2012). Transition from IPv4 to IPv6: The method for large enterprise networks. In INNOV 2012, the first international conference on communications, computation, networks and technologies (pp. 5–14).

  4. Lee, Y., Durand, A., Woodyatt, J., & Droms, R. (2011). Dual-stack lite broadband deployments following IPv4 exhaustion.

  5. Punithavathani, D. S., & Sankaranarayanan, K. (2009). IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms. European Journal of Scientific Research, 34(1), 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Govil, J., Govil, J., Kaur, N., & Kaur, H. (2008). An examination of IPv4 and IPv6 networks: Constraints and various transition mechanisms. In Southeastcon, 2008. IEEE (pp. 178–185). IEEE.

  7. Tsirtsis, G. (2000). Network address translation-protocol translation (NAT-PT). Network.

  8. Aoun, C., & Davies, E. (2007). Reasons to move the Network Address Translator-Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to historic status. RFC 4966, July, 2007.

  9. McFarland, S., Sambi, M., Sharma, N., & Hooda, S. (2011). IPv6 for enterprise networks. Indianapolis: Pearson Education.

  10. Colitti, L., Gunderson, S. H., Kline, E., & Refice, T. (2010). Evaluating IPv6 adoption in the Internet. In A. Krishnamurthy & B. Plattner (Eds.), Passive and active measurement (pp. 141–150). Berlin: Springer.

  11. Li, C.-S., Lin, F., & Chao, H.-C. (2009). Routing optimization over network mobility with distributed home agents as the cross layer consideration. Telecommunication Systems, 42(1–2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azcorra, A., Kryczka, M., & García-Martínez, A. (2010). Integrated routing and addressing for improved IPv4 and IPv6 coexistence. Communications Letters IEEE, 14(5), 477–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aazam, M., Shah, S. A. H., Khan, I. & Qayyum, A. (2010). Deployment and performance evaluation of Teredo and ISATAP over real test-bed setup. In Proceedings of the international conference on management of emergent digital ecosystems (pp. 229–233). ACM.

  14. Wang, Y., Ye, S. & Li, X. (2005). Understanding current IPv6 performance: A measurement study. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE symposium on computers and communications, 2005. ISCC 2005. (pp. 71–76). IEEE.

  15. Cui, Y., Vautrin, O., Lee, Y., Metz, C., Wu, J., & Wu, P. (2011). Public IPv4 over access IPv6 network.

  16. Jayanthi, J. G., & Rabara, S. A. (2010). IPv6 addressing architecture in IPv4 network. In Second international conference on communication software and networks, 2010. ICCSN’10 (pp. 461–465). IEEE.

  17. Cui, Y., Dong, J., Wu, P., Wu, J., Metz, C., Lee, Y. L., et al. (2013). Tunnel-based IPv6 transition. Internet Computing, IEEE, 17(2), 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blanchet, M., & Parent, F., (2010). IPv6 Tunnel Broker with the Tunnel Setup Protocol (TSP).

  19. Hamarsheh, A., Goossens, M., & Al-Qerem, A. (2012). Assuring interoperability between heterogeneous (IPv4/IPv6) networks without using protocol translation. IETE Technical Review, 29(2), 114–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, J.-H., Han, Y.-H., Gundavelli, S., & Chung, T.-M.. (2009). A comparative performance analysis on hierarchical mobile IPv6 and proxy mobile IPv6. Telecommunication Systems, 41(4), 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huitema, C. (2006). Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through network address translations (NATs).

  22. Srisuresh, P., & Egevang, K. (2001) Traditional IP network address translator (Traditional NAT), 1–16.

  23. Bao, C., Huitema, C., Bagnulo, M., & Boucadair, M. (2010) X. Li,” IPv6 addressing of IPv4. IPv6 translators”, RFC 6052.

  24. Sehgal, A., Talwar, M., Agarwal, A., & Ustuntas, K. (2012) Teredo connectivity between clients behind symmetric NATs. US Patent 8,194,683, issued June 5, 2012.

  25. Tsetse, A. K., Wijesinha, A. L., Karne, R. K., & Loukili, A. (2012). A 6to4 gateway with co-located NAT. In 2012 IEEE international conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  26. Zimu, L., Wei, P., & Yujun, L. (2012). An innovative Ipv4–ipv6 transition way for Internet service provider. In 2012 IEEE symposium on robotics and applications (ISRA) (pp. 672–675). IEEE.

  27. Lim, T. M., Lee, B.-S., Yeo, C. K., Tantra, J. W., & Xia, Y. (2009). A terminal-assisted route optimized NEMO management. Telecommunication Systems, 42(3–4), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mrugalski, T., Wozniak, J., & Nowicki, K. (2013). Dynamic host configuration protocol for IPv6 improvements for mobile nodes. Telecommunication Systems, 52(2), 1021–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sailan, M. K., Hassan, R., & Patel, A. (2009). A comparative review of IPv4 and IPv6 for research test bed. In 2009 International Conference on electrical engineering and informatics, 5–7 August 2009, Selangor, Malaysia.

  30. Lopes, N. V., Nicolau, M. J., & Santos, A. (2013). A QoS-enabled resource management scheme for F-HMIPv6 micro mobility approach. Telecommunication Systems, 52(1), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of CSE, Government College of Engineering, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India

    Sheryl Radley & D. Shalini Punithavathani

Authors
  1. Sheryl Radley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Shalini Punithavathani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheryl Radley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radley, S., Punithavathani, D.S. Green Computing in WAN Through Intensified Teredo IPv6 Tunneling to Route Multifarious Symmetric NAT. Wireless Pers Commun 87, 381–398 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2876-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2876-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation