[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Big Data Analytics (BDA) is an emerging phenomenon with the reported potential to transform how firms manage and enhance high value businesses performance. The purpose of our study is to investigate the impact of BDA on operations management in the manufacturing sector, which is an acknowledged infrequently researched context. Using an interpretive qualitative approach, this empirical study leverages a comparative case study of three manufacturing companies with varying levels of BDA usage (experimental, moderate and heavy). The information technology (IT) business value literature and a resource based view informed the development of our research propositions and the conceptual framework that illuminated the relationships between BDA capability and organizational readiness and design. Our findings indicate that BDA capability (in terms of data sourcing, access, integration, and delivery, analytical capabilities, and people’s expertise) along with organizational readiness and design factors (such as BDA strategy, top management support, financial resources, and employee engagement) facilitated better utilization of BDA in manufacturing decision making, and thus enhanced high value business performance. Our results also highlight important managerial implications related to the impact of BDA on empowerment of employees, and how BDA can be integrated into organizations to augment rather than replace management capabilities. Our research will be of benefit to academics and practitioners in further aiding our understanding of BDA utilization in transforming operations and production management. It adds to the body of limited empirically based knowledge by highlighting the real business value resulting from applying BDA in manufacturing firms and thus encouraging beneficial economic societal changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Dhar, V. (2014). Editorial—big data, data science, and analytics: the opportunity and challenge for IS research. Information Systems Research, 25, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auschitzky, E., Hammer, M., & Rajagopaul, A. (2014). How big data can improve manufacturing. McKinsey&Company.

  • Babiceanu, R., & Seker, R. (2015). Manufacturing operations, internet of things, and big data: towards predictive manufacturing systems. In T. Borangiu, A. Thomas, D. Trentesaux (Eds.) Service orientation in holonic and multi-agent manufacturing. Springer International Publishing.

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-Amado, J., & Walczuch, M. R. (2012). Information technology, the organizational capability of proactive corporate environmental strategy and firm performance: a resource-based analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 664–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez‐Amado, J., Llorens‐Montes, F. J., & Perez‐Arostegui, M. N. (2010). Information technology‐enabled intrapreneurship culture and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110, 550–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, P. J., Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2010). Enabling strategic transformations with enterprise systems: Beyond operational efficiency. In M. Lacity, S. March, & F. Niederman (Eds.), 31st international conference on information systems. St. Louis: Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, R., Davidson, R., Kam, B., & Smyrnios, K. (2013). Developing organizational agility through IT and supply chain capability. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 21, 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (1994). Qualitative methods in organizational research: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24, 976–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Siau, K. (2011). Impact of business intelligence and IT infrastructure flexibility on competitive performance: An organizational agility perspective. In C. Beath, M. D. Myers, & K. K. Wei (Eds.), 32nd infernational conference on information systems. Shanghai: Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1165–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., Barth, P., & Bean, R. (2012). How big data is different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M. J., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., & Golicic, L. S. (2010). Gaining comparative advantage in supply chain relationships: the mediating role of market-oriented IT competence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezdar, S., & Sulaiman, A. (2010). The influence of organizational factors on successful ERP implementation. Management Decision, 49, 911–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, D., & Bose, I. (2015). Managing a big data project: the case of ramco cements limited. International Journal of Production Economics, In Press.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, W. A., & Herriott, R. E. (1983). The formalization of qualitative research: an adaptation of “soft” science to the policy world. Evaluation Review, 7, 437–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015). How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, Forthcoming.

  • Galliers, R. D., & Whitley, E. A. (2007). Vive les differences? Developing a profile of european information systems research as a basis for international comparisons. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L., Chen, D. Q., Boudreau, M. C., Davis, A., & Cochran, J. (2009). Addressing business agility challenges with enterprise systems. MIS Quarterly Executive, 8, 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., & Malhotra, M. K. (1999). A framework for examining the interface between operations and information systems: implications for research in the new millennium. Decision Sciences, 30, 901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40, 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hvolby, H.-H., & Steger-Jensen, K. (2010). Technical and industrial issues of advanced planning and scheduling (APS) systems. Computers in Industry, 61, 845–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D. (2013). Organizational alignment is key to big data success. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 1-n/a.

  • Kiron, D., Prentice, P. K., & Ferguson, R. B. (2012). Innovating with analytics. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., Prentice, P. K., & Ferguson, R. B. (2014). Raising the bar with analytics. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzer, M., Maedche, A. & Gass, O. Barriers to BI&A generativity: which factors impede Stable BI&A PLATFORMS FROM ENABLING ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY? 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2014 Savannah, GA, USA. Association for Information Systems.

  • Lavalle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1, 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcafee, A. & Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: the management revolution. Harvard business review, 3–9.

  • McLaren, T. S., Head, M. M., Yuan, Y., & Chan, Y. E. (2011). A multilevel model for measuring fit between a firm’s competitive strategies and information systems capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 35, 909–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA.

  • Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35, 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Lee, M. R., Earley, S., Murugesan, S., & Djavanshir, R. (2013). Leveraging big data and business analytics. IT Professional, 15, 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munirathinam, S. & Ramadoss, B. (2014). Big data predictive analtyics for proactive semiconductor equipment maintenance. IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 893–902.

  • Oh, W. & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 239–265.

  • Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2012). Towards business intelligence systems success: effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision making. Decision Support Systems, 54, 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P. S., & Jaklič, J. (2014). How information-sharing values influence the use of information systems: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29, 625–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27, 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, R. & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS quarterly , 125–153.

  • Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014). Transforming decision-making processes: a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly, 35, 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509–533.

  • VAN Oosterhout, M., Waarts, E., & VAN Hillegersberg, J. (2006). Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 107–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2013). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16, 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixom, B. H., Yen, B., & Relich, M. (2013). Maximizing value from business analytics. MIS Quarterly Executive, 12.

  • Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelbst, P. J., Green, K. W., Jr., Sower, V. E., & Abshire, R. D. (2011). Radio frequency identification techonology utilization and organizational agility. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleš Popovič.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Popovič, A., Hackney, R., Tassabehji, R. et al. The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance. Inf Syst Front 20, 209–222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9720-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9720-4

Keywords

Navigation