[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of land use land cover changes on hydrological response of Punpun River basin

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study assessed the hydrological response of land use land cover (LULC) change on the Punpun River basin. High-resolution gridded rainfall and temperature data from the years 1995 to 2020 have been used in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in the Geographic Information System (GIS) to analyze the hydrological response of the Punpun River basin and water balance components. Hydrological Response Units (HRUs) have been created for the basin. Each HRU is based on a distinct combination of soil, slope, and land use. Five SWAT models have been prepared based on the LULC of every 5-year interval to simulate the basin’s hydrological response. The period selected for calibration is 1995–2015 and for validation is 2016–2020 for the modeling of daily streamflow data. The observed and simulated streamflow was checked for performance indices of coefficient of determination (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS) on daily time steps. The results were found to be good with R2 = 0.72, NSE = 0.68, and PBIAS = 23.2 for calibration and R2 = 0.93, NSE = 0.77, and PBIAS = 19.8 for validation. The study reveals that 7.01% of evapotranspiration (ET) was increased from 1995 to 2020 with increase in agricultural area of 21.86%. It was also found that built-up area, surface runoff, and water yield have been increased by 9.14, 14.43, and 17.40%, respectively. Further, the groundwater contribution of the basin was decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and materials

Some or all data that support the findings of this study are not available publicly; the reader should contact the corresponding author for details.

References

  • Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S. B., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., & Kløve, B. (2015). A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2–4), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghsaei, H., Dinan, N. M., Moridi, A., Asadolahi, Z., Delavar, M., Fohrer, N., & Wagner, P. D. (2020). Effects of dynamic land use/land cover change on water resources and sediment yield in the Anzali wetland catchment, Gilan, Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 712, 136449.

  • Akoko, G., Le, T. H., Gomi, T., & Kato, T. (2021). A Review of SWAT Model Application in Africa. Water, 13, 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association34(1), 73-89.

  • Ayivi, F., & Jha, M. K. (2018). Estimation of water balance and water yield in the Reedy Fork-Buffalo Creek Watershed in North Carolina using SWAT. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 6, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T. J., & Miller, S. E. (2013). Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an east African watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 486, 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, A., Shabbir, R., Ahmad, S. S., & Aziz, N. (2015). Land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, W., Bowden, W. B., & Davie, T. (2009). Modelling impacts of land cover change on critical water resources in the Motueka River catchment, New Zealand. Water Resource Management, 23, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, M. L., Knouft, J. H., Ghulam, A., Guzman, J. A., & Pan, Z. (2013). Impacts of urbanization on river flow frequency: A controlled experimental modeling-based evaluation approach. Journal of Hydrology, 495, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, M. H., Botta, A., & Cardille, J. A. (2003). Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology, 283, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Serrão, E. A., Silva, M. T., Ferreira, T. R., de Ataide, L. C. P., dos Santos, C. A., de Lima, A. M. M., ... & Gomes, D. J. C. (2022). Impacts of land use and land cover changes on hydrological processes and sediment yield determined using the SWAT model. International Journal of Sediment Research37(1), 54-69.

  • Engida, T., Nigussie, T. A., Aneseyee, A. B., & Barnabas, J. (2021). Land use/land cover change impact on hydrological process in the Upper Baro Basin, Ethiopia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, Article ID, 6617541, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6617541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman, P. W., Sadeghi, A. M., & Srinivasan, R. (2014). Applications of the SWAT model special section: Overview and insights. Journal of Environmental Quality, 43(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.11.0466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Güler, M., Yomralioǧu, T., & Reis, S. (2007). Using Landsat data to determine land use/land cover changes in Samsun. Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127(1–3), 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahmann, A. N., & Dickinson, R. E. (1997). RCCM2-BATS model over tropical South America: Application to tropical deforestation. Journal of Climate, 10, 1944–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iban, M. C., & Sahin, E. (2022). Monitoring land use and land cover change near a nuclear power plant construction site: Akkuyu case. Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, 724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imam, S. (2021). Population growth and urbanization in Bihar: A district level analysis. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 10(8), 606–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, S., Khare, D., & Mondal, A. (2017). Past, present and future land use changes and their impact on water balance. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 582–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J., & Berbery, E. H. (2012). Land cover change effects on the climate of the La Plata Basin. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13(1), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, R., Pielke, R. A., Hubbard, K. G., Niyogi, D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Mcalpine, C., Carleton, A. M., Hale, R., Gameda, S., Beltrán-Przekurat, A., Baker, B., Mcnider, R., Legates, D. R., Shepherd, M., Du, J., Blanken, P. D., Frauenfeld, O. W., Nair, U. S., & Fall, S. (2014). Land cover changes and their biogeophysical effects on climate. International Journal of Climatology, 34(4), 929–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G. (2003). The climatic impacts of land surface change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change mitigation policy. Climate Policy, 3, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheussen, B., Kirschbaum, R. L., Goodman, I. A., O’Donnell, G. M., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2000). Effects of land cover change on streamflow in the interior Columbia River Basin (USA and Canada). Hydrological Processes, 14, 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi, D., Arnold, J., Van Liew, M., Bingner, R., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in water-shed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoth, P., & Goyal, R. (2019). Impacts of land use land cover change on runoff and sediment yield of Upper Tapi River Sub-Basin. India, International Journal of River Basin Management,. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2019.1613413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, M., Massetti, L., & Orlandini, S. (2017). Hydrological response to land use and climate changes in a rural hilly basin in Italy. CATENA, 157, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, C. A., Sellers, P. J., & Shukla, J. (1991). Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. Journal of Climate, 4, 957–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panda, D. K., & Wahr, J. (2016). Spatiotemporal evolution of waterstorage changes in India from theupdated GRACE-derived gravityrecords, Water Resour. Res., 52, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R., Sr., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Davey, C., Angel, J., Bliss, O., Doesken, N., Cai, M., Fall, S., Niyogi, D., Gallo, K., Hale, R., Hubbard, K. G., Lin, X., Li, H., & Raman, S. (2007). Documentation of uncertainties and biases associated with surface temperature measurement sites for climate change assessment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88(6), 913–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignotti, G., Rathjens, H., Cibin, R., Chaubey, I., & Crawford, M. (2017). Comparative analysis of HRU and grid-based SWAT models. Water, 9, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, A. J. (2003). The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 479–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, S., & Singh, V. (2022). HEC-HMS based rainfall-runoff model for Punpun River basin. Water Practice and Technology, 17(5), 986–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, S., & Singh, V. (2023). ANN and GRNN-based coupled model for flood inundation mapping of the Punpun River basin. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., 13(1), 9941–9946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautela, K. S., Kumar, M., Sofi, M. S., Kuniyal, J. C., & Bhat, S. U. (2022). Modelling of streamflow and water balance in the kuttiyadi River Basin using SWAT and remote sensing/GIS tools. International Journal of Environmental Research, 16(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautela, K. S., Kumar, D., Gandhi, B. G. R., Kumar, A., & Dubey, A. K. (2023). Long-term hydrological simulation for the estimation of snowmelt contribution of Alaknanda River Basin, Uttarakhand using SWAT. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua, 72(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saddique, N., Mahmood, T., & Bernhofer, C. (2020). Quantifying the impacts of land use/land cover change on the water balance in the afforested River Basin. Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci, 79, 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09206-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sam, T. T., & Khoi, D. N. (2022). The responses of river discharge and sediment load to historical land-use/land-cover change in the Mekong River Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, 700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y. K., Gassman, P. W., & Wolter, C. F. (2008). Impact of land use and land cover change on the water balance of a large agricultural watershed: Historical effects and future directions. Water Resources Research, 44, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sertel, E., Robock, A., & Ormeci, C. (2010). Impacts of land cover data quality on regional climate simulations. International Journal of Climatology, 30, 1942–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R. K., Eldho, T. I., & Ghosh, S. (2020). Assessing the impacts of land cover and climate on runoff and sediment yield of a river basin. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65, 2097–2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanya, K. (2013). “Engineering hydrology”, McGraw Hill Education Private Limited, Fourth Edition, New Delhi.

  • Sy, S., Noblet-Ducoudré, N. D., Quesada, B., Sy, I., Dieye, A. M., Gaye, A. T., & Sultan, B. (2017). Land-surface characteristics and climate in West Africa: Models’ biases and impacts of historical anthropogenically-induced deforestation. Sustainability, MDPI, 9(10), 1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thokchom, B. (2020). Water-related problem with special reference to global climate change in India. Water Conservation and Wastewater Treatment in BRICS Nations, Elsevier, 37–60.

  • Wang, Y., Jiang, R., Xie, J., Zhao, Y., Yan, D., & Yang, S. (2019). Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model: A systemic review. In: Guido-Aldana, P.A. and Mulahasan, S. (eds.), Advances in Water Resources and Exploration. Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 93, pp. 22–30. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749–0208.

  • Wei, X., & Zhang, M. (2010). Quantifying streamflow change caused by forest disturbance at a large spatial scale: A single watershed study. Water Resources Research, 46, W12525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, R., Zhang, X., Yan, S., Zhang, J., & Chen, H. (2018). Spatial patterns of hydrological responses to land use/cover change in a catchment on the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators, 92, 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Karthikeyan, R., Bai, Z., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). Analysis of streamflow responses to climate variability and land use change in the Loess Plateau region of China. CATENA, 154, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, M., Niu, J., Kang, S., Li, X., & Hongna, Lu. (2017). The contribution of human agricultural activities to increasing evapotranspiration is significantly greater than climate change effect over Heihe agricultural region. Science and Reports, 7, 8805. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08952-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Central Water Commission (CWC) Patna for providing the river discharge data and other online sources such as NASA Agro Climate Data, USGS Earth Explorer, and FAO Soil Map that are used for carrying out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shashi Ranjan: literature review, conceptualization, methodology, modeling, result analysis, conclusion, and writing the original manuscript. Vivekanand Singh: conceptualization, supervision/guidance, and reviewed original manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivekanand Singh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Standards

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors and are aware that with minor exceptions, no changes can be made to authorship once the paper is submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranjan, S., Singh, V. Effect of land use land cover changes on hydrological response of Punpun River basin. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1137 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11785-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11785-7

Keywords

Navigation