[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

An audio MOOC framework for the digital inclusion of low literate people in the distance education process

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work introduces an innovative audio massive open online courses (MOOC) framework which enables distance learning through mere phone calls, leveraging the existing telephony infrastructure as an alternative to internet connectivity, for the illiterate/semi-literate population. It has been conceived to open up access to learning materials to the unreached and the have-nots usually hindered by barriers such as language, literacy, culture, connectivity and distance. While existing MOOCs are being developed for higher-end phones and tablets having internet access, we are proposing a framework for lower-end mobile phones by exploiting VoIP and IVR technology over existing telecommunication infrastructure to enable access to audio learning materials. This work formulates 47 requirements for an audio MOOC framework, which comprises three layers, namely the application, the interfacing and the telephony layers, each having their respective functionalities. As proof of concept, we derived two (2) architectures, namely the configuration-only and the plugin architecture. From thereon, several systems were implemented on varying case scenarios and tested on controlled groups of 267 semi-literate participants both in Mauritius and India, respectively. Very conclusive and promising results were obtained in terms of infrastructure setup under various scenarios, usability and ease of use of the system, learning effectiveness through the pre- and post-test carried out. The framework proved to be reliable, robust and performed as per its requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of data and material

The authors declare the data are available upon request.

Code availability

The authors declare that there is no code pertaining to this research.

Notes

  1. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software

  2. https://www.elastic.co/products/kibana

References

  1. Agarwal, A.: Online Universities. It’s Time for Teacher+A1:A14s to Join the Revolution. The Guardian (2013). Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/jun/15/university-education-online-mooc

  2. Friedmand, T.: Revolution Hits the Universities. The New York Times (2013). Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/opinion/sunday/friedman-revolution-hits-the-universities.html

  3. Maguire, D.: The 'Hype Cycle’ of MOOCs and Other Big Ideas. Times Higher Education (2014). Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/the-hype-cycle-of-moocs-and-other-big-ideas/2010206.article

  4. Shah, D.: By The Numbers: MOOCS in 2017. How has the MOOC Space Grown This Year? Get the Facts, Figures, and Pie Charts (2018). Online. Available at: https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/

  5. Shah, D.: A Decade of MOOCs: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2021—Class Central (2021). Available at: https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2021/.

  6. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., Emanuel, E.J.: The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Available at: SSRN 2350964 (2013)

  7. OECD: ICTs and Economic Growth in Developing Countries (2005). Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf

  8. Van Dijk, J.: Digital divide: impact of access. In: Rössler, P., Hoffner, C.A., Zoonen, A. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, pp. 1–11. Wiley, Chichester (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Rasheed, R.A., et al.: A systematic mapping study of the empirical MOOC literature. IEEE Access 7, 124809–124827 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2938561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Worldbank: Literacy Rate, Adult Total (% of People Ages 15 and Above) (2018). [Online]. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS?end=2016&locations=ZG-1W-Z4-8S-Z7-ZJ&start=2016&view=bar

  11. ITU: ICT Facts and Figures (2017). Online. Available at: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf

  12. Gameel, B.G., Wilkins, K.G.: When it comes to MOOCs, where you are from makes a difference. Comput. Educ. 136, 49–60 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van de Oudeweetering, K., Agirdag, O., Sun, J.C.Y., Chen, A.Y.Z., Yeh, K.P.C., Cheng, Y.T., Lin, Y.Y., Hwang, G.J., Tu, N.T., Wang, X.M., Michailidis, N.: 10. The virtues of Taiwanese internet-using adolescents: the development and validation of the cyber virtues scale. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 21(1), 104–111 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans, S., McIntyre, K.: MOOCs in the humanities: Can they reach underprivileged students? Convergence 22(3), 313–323 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Deursen, A.J., Helsper, E.J.: The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In: Robinson, L., Cotten, S.R., Schulz, J., Hale, T.M., Williams, A. (eds.) Communication and Information Technologies Annual. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koutropoulos, A., Zaharias, P.: Down the rabbit hole: an initial typology of issues around the development of MOOCs. Curr. Issues Emerg. eLearn. 2(1), 4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(3), 202–227 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haggard, S., Brown, S., Mills, R., Tait, A., Warburton, S., Lawton, W., Angulo, T.: The Maturing of the MOOC: Literature Review of Massive Open Online Courses and Other Forms of Online Distance Learning. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, UK Government (2013)

  19. Moloo, R.K., Khedo, K.K., & Prabhakar, T.V.: Critical evaluation of existing audio learning systems using a proposed TOL model. Comput. Educ. 117, 102–115 (2018)

  20. Moloo, R.K.: An Audio MOOC framework leveraging the telephony infrastructure as an alternative to Internet Connectivity. PhD Dissertation. University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius (2020)

  21. Shears, A.E.: Development of management courses for the agriculture sector in Nigeria. PLET Program. Learn. Educ. Technol. 21(2), 88–94 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Long, T.: Broadcasting for rural development. Media Educ. Dev. 17(1), 17–19 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ginsburg, M.B., Arias-Godinez, B.: Nonformal education and social reproduction/transformation: educational radio in Mexico. Comp. Educ. Rev. 28(1), 116–127 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Byram, M., Kidd, R.: Hands-on approach to popularizing radio learning group campaigns. Convergence 16(4), 14 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anzalone, S., Bosch, A., World Bank: Improving Educational Quality Through Interactive Radio Instruction a Toolkit for Policymakers and Planners (2005). Available at : http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRICA/Resources/toolkit_for_radio.pdf

  26. Cooksun, P.S.: Instructor and participant responses to critical condition of audio conferencing. Tech. Trends 40(4), 23–25 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Macmullen, P.: Audio Conferencing in Support of Distance Education (2001). COL Available at http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/34/KS2001-02_audioconferencing.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  28. Hitch, L.P., MacBrayne, P.: A Model for Effectively Supporting e-Learning (2003). Available at: http://technologysource.org/article/6/

  29. Gilroy, K., Diedhiou, A., Cox, C.M., Duncan, L., Koumtingue, D., Pacqué-Margolis, S., Fort, A., Settle, D., Bailey, R.: Use of an Interactive Voice Response System to deliver Refresher Training in Senegal: Findings from Pilot Implementation and Assessment (2015). Available at: http://www.capacityplus.org/files/resources/ivr-system-refresher-training-senegal.pdf

  30. Patel, N., Agarwal, S., Rajput, N., Nanavati, A., Dave, P., Parikh, T.S.: Experiences designing a voice interface for rural India. In: Spoken Language Technology Workshop, 2008. SLT 2008, pp. 21–24. IEEE (2008)

  31. Vuong, S.T., Schroeder, J., Alam, M., Tjia, A., Chung, Y.I., Chen, A. (2010) LIVES: learning through an interactive voice educational system. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2010, pp. 157–164

  32. Motiwalla, L.F.: A voice-enabled E-learning service platform. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Networking and Services, ICNS 2009, pp. 597–602 (2009)

  33. García, V.M.Á., Ruiz, M.D.P.P., Pérez, J.R.P.: Voice interactive classroom, a service-oriented software architecture for speech-enabled learning. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 33(5), 603–610 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stracke, C.M., Trisolini, G.: A systematic literature review on the quality of MOOCs. Sustainability 13(11), 5817 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kazman, R., Klein, M., Clements, P.: ATAM: Method for Architecture Evaluation (No. CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004). Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst. (2000)

  36. López, X., Valenzuela, J., Nussbaum, M., Tsai, C.C.: Some recommendations for the reporting of quantitative studies. Comput. Educ. 91(C), 106–110 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Monthly Telecom Scenario March 2023 (2023). Available at: https://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/MTS%20March%202023.pdf?download=1

  38. Literacy Rate of India 2021 || State Wise Literacy Rate (2021). Available at: https://censusofindia2021.com/literacy-rate-of-india-2021/

  39. countrymeters.info: Mauritius Population (2023) Live—Countrymeters (n.d.). Available at: https://countrymeters.info/en/Mauritius#:~:text=Literacy%20rate%20for%20adult%20female,youth%20literacy%20rate%20is%2098.72%25

  40. Observatory Internet—ICTA Website (nd). Available at: https://www.icta.mu/observatory-internet/

  41. D’Alonzo, K.: Evaluation and revision of questionnaires for use among low-literacy immigrant Latinos. Rev. Latino Am. Enferm. 19(5), 1255–1264 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bernal, H., Wooley, S., Schensul, J.J.: The challenge of using likert-type scales with low-literate ethnic populations. Nurs. Res. 46(3), 179–181 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yadav, K.: MobiMOOC-A Massive Open Online Course on Horticulture-An Effectiveness Study, Uttar Pradesh State, INDIA (2015). Available at: https://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/574. Accessed 24 Dec 2018

  44. Gregg, B.: Linux Load Averages: Solving the Mystery (2017). Available at: http://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-08-08/linux-load-averages.html.

  45. Ong, W.J.: Orality and Literacy. Routledge, London (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Laaser, W.: Some didactic aspects of audio-cassettes in distance education. Distance Educ. 7(1), 143–152 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Cognitive Domain. Longman, Harlow (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Meet, R.K., Kala, D.: Trends and future prospects in MOOC researches: a systematic literature review 2013–2020. Contemp. Educ. Technol. 13(3), 312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10986

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was sponsored by the following: (1) Mobile for Malis, India—Commonwealth of Learning (COL), Research-I Foundation, and the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IIT Kanpur. [Grant No. NA—It was an MoU between IITk and COL], (2) Mauritius Research Council (MRC) [Grant No: MRC/RUN/1726], (3) Outer Island Development Corporation (OIDC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raj Kishen Moloo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

This work did not require any ethics approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moloo, R.K., Khedo, K.K. & Prabhakar, T.V. An audio MOOC framework for the digital inclusion of low literate people in the distance education process. Univ Access Inf Soc (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01051-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01051-5

Keywords

Navigation