[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

A conjugate gradient sampling method for nonsmooth optimization

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present an algorithm for minimizing locally Lipschitz functions being continuously differentiable in an open dense subset of \(\mathbb {R}^n\). The function may be nonsmooth and/or nonconvex. The method makes use of a gradient sampling method along with a conjugate gradient scheme. To find search directions, we make use of a sequence of positive definite approximate Hessians based on conjugate gradient matrices. The algorithm benefits from a restart procedure to improve upon poor search directions or to make sure that the approximate Hessians remain bounded. The global convergence of the algorithm is established. An implementation of the algorithm is executed on a collection of well-known test problems. Comparative numerical results clearly show outperformance of the algorithm over some recent well-known nonsmooth algorithms using the Dolan–Moré performance profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://cs.nyu.edu/overton/papers/gradsamp/.

References

  • Andrei N (2010) Accelerated scaled memoryless BFGS preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for unconstrained optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204:410–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale EML (1972) A derivation of conjugate gradients. In: Lootsma FA (ed) Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Optimization. Academic Press, London, pp 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke JV, Lewis AS, Overton ML (2005) A robust gradient sampling algorithm for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 15:751–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Fukushima M (1999) Proximal quasi-Newton methods for nondifferentiable convex optimization. Math. Program. 85:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke FH (1983) Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis FE, Overton ML (2012) A sequential quadratic programming method for nonconvex nonsmooth constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 22:474–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis FE, Que X (2013) An adaptive gradient sampling algorithm for nonsmooth optimization. Optim. Methods Softw. 28:1302–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniilidis A, Sagastizábal C, Solodov M (2009) Identifying structure of nonsmooth convex functions by the bundle techniques. SIAM J. Optim. 20:820–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan E, Moré J (2002) Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. 91:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein AA (1977) Optimization of Lipschitz continuous functions. Math. Program. 13:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haarala M, Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2004) New limited memory bundle method for large-scale nonsmooth optimization. Optim. Methods Softw. 19:673–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmitsa N, Mäkelä MM, Ali MM (2008) Limited memory interior point bundle method for large inequality constrained nonsmooth minimization. Appl. Math. Comput. 198(1):382–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwiel KC (2007) Convergence of the gradient sampling algorithm for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 18:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiwiel KC (2010) A nonderivative version of the gradient sampling algorithm for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 20:1983–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis AS, Overton ML (2013) Nonsmooth optimization via quasi-Newton methods. Math. Program. 141:135–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukšan, L., Tuma, M., Siska, M., Vlček, J., Ramesova, N.: Interactive system for universal functional optimization. Technical Report UFO 2002/No. 883, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic (2002)

  • Lukšan, L., Vlček, J.: Test problems for nonsmooth unconstrained and linearly constrained optimization. Technical Report No. 798, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic (2000)

  • Mahdavi-Amiri N, Yousefpour R (2012) An effective nonsmooth optimization algorithm for locally Lipschitz functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 155:180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mifflin R, Sagastizábal C (2005) A VU-algorithm for convex minimization. Math. Program. 104:583–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J, Wright SJ (2006) Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanno DF (1978) Conjugate gradient methods with inexact searches. Math. Oper. Res. 3:244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanno DF (1978) On the convergence of a new conjugate gradient algorithm. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 15:1247–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skajaa A (2010) Limited memory BFGS for Nonsmooth Optimization. New York University, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the research council of Sharif University of Technology for supporting this work. Personal discussion with Rohollah Yousefpour on early stages of our work is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Mahdavi-Amiri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahdavi-Amiri, N., Shaeiri, M. A conjugate gradient sampling method for nonsmooth optimization. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 18, 73–90 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-019-00404-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-019-00404-2

Keywords

Navigation