A new model for estimating End-of-Life disassembly effort during early stages of product design

• Appelqvist P, Lehtonen JM, Kokkonen J (2004) Modeling in product and supply chain design: literature survey and case study. J Manuf Technol Manag 15(7):675–685

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Berliner C, Brimson JA (1988) Cost management for today’s advanced manufacturing: the CAM-I conceptual design. Harvard Business School Press, Computer integrated manufacturing systems

• Brennan L, Gupta SM, Taleb KN (1994) Operations planning issues in an assembly/disassembly environment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 14(9):57–67

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Campbell MI, Hasan A (2003) Design evaluation method for the disassembly of electronic equipment, International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm

• Carter D, Baker B (1992) Concurrent Engineering: the product development environment for the 1990s. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massa-chussets

  Google Scholar 

• Chen KZ (2001) Development of integrated design for disassembly and recycling in concurrent engineering. Integr Manuf Syst 12:67–79

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Chiu M-C, Kremer GEO (2011) Investigation of the applicability of Design for X tools during design concept evolution: a literature review. Int. J. Product Development 13(2):132–167

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Das SK, Yedlarajiah P, Narendra R (2000) An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost. Int J Prod Res 38(3):657–673

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Desai A, Mital A (2003) Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production. Int J Ind Ergon 32:265–281

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dowlatshahi S (1996) Role of logistics in concurrent engineering. Int J Prod Econ 44(3):189–199

  Article  Google Scholar 

• ‘E-waste: dismantling a CRT monitor’, uploaded by ewasteguide [online] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHC35ucKK-E Accessed 13 March 2009

• Fabrycky WJ, Blanchard BS (1991) Life-Cycle cost and economics analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

  Google Scholar 

• Feldmann K, Trautner S, Meedt O (1999) Design for disassembly: a critical twenty-first century discipline. Annu Rev Control 23:159–164

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Giudice F, Kassem M (2009) End-of-life impact reduction through analysis and redistribution of disassembly depth: a case study in electronic device redesign. Comput Ind Eng 57:677–690

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Go TF, Wahab DA, Rahman MN Ab, Ramli R, Azhari CH (2011) Disassemblability of end-of life vehicle: a critical review of evaluation methods. J Clean Prod 19:1536–1546

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gungor A (2006) Evaluation of connection types in design for disassembly (DFD) using analytic network process. Comput Ind Eng 50:35–54

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gungor A, Gupta SM (1997) An evaluation methodology for disassembly processes. Comput Ind Eng 33(1–2):329–332

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harivardhini S, Chakrabarti A (2014) Analysis of dismantling processes for assessing disassembly effort and ergonomic hazards at the end of life of electronic appliances. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 9(3):204–214

  Google Scholar 

• Harivardhini S, Chakrabarti A (2015) Comparison of disassembly effort and ergonomic hazards in dismantling electronic appliances by formal and informal recycling sectors in developing countries. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 8(2):111–131

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Harjula T, Rapoza B, Knight WA, Boothroyd G (1996) Design for disassembly and the environment. Ann ClRP 45(7):109–114

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keys LK (1990) System life cycle engineering and DF‘X’. IEEE Trans Compon Hybrids Manuf Technol 13(1):83–93

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kroll E, Hanft TA (1998) Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling. Res Eng Design 10:101–114

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mok HS, Kim HJ, Moon KS (1997) Disassemblability of mechanical parts in automobile for recycling. Comput Ind Eng 33(3–4):621–624

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Santochi M, Dini G, Failli F (2002) Computer aided disassembly planning: state of the art and perspectives. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51(2):507–529

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sodhi M, Knight WA (1998) Product design for disassembly and bulk recycling. Ann CIRP 47(1):115–118

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sodhi R, Sonnenberg M, Das S (2004) Evaluating the unfastening effort in design for disassembly and serviceability. J Eng Des 15(1):69–90

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spearman’s Rank correlation coefficient—Excel guide, Royal Geographical Society with IBG, www.rgs.org

• Subramani A, Dewhurst P (1994) Repair time estimation for early stages of product development. J Des Manuf 4(2):129–137

  Google Scholar 

• Suga T, Saneshige K, Fiujimoto J (1996) Quantitative disassembly evaluation. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, pp 19–24

• Veerakamolmal P, Gupta SM (1999) A Combinatorial cost-benefit analysis methodology for designing modular electronic products for the environment. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, pp 268–273

• Vinodh S, Nachiappan N, Praveen Kumar R (2011) Sustainability through disassembly modeling, planning, and leveling: a case study. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-011-0361-5

  Google Scholar 

• Viswanathan S, Allada V (2001) Configuration analysis to support product redesign for end-of-life disassembly. Int J Prod Res 39(8):1733–1753

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang JP, Allada V (2000) Hierarchial fuzzy neural network based serviceability evaluation. Int J Agile Manag Syst 2(2):130–141

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yi HC, Park YC, Lee KS (2003) A study on the method of disassembly time evaluation of a product using work factor method. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international conference on systems, Man Cybernetics, pp 1753–1759

Download references