[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ELM-based driver torque demand prediction and real-time optimal energy management strategy for HEVs

  • Extreme Learning Machine and Deep Learning Networks
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In hybrid electric vehicles, the energy economy depends on the coordination between the internal combustion engine and the electric machines under the constraint that the total propulsion power satisfies the driver demand power. To optimize this coordination, not only the current power demand but also the future one is needed for real-time distribution decision. This paper presents a prediction-based optimal energy management strategy. Extreme learning machine algorithm is exploited to provide the driver torque demand prediction for realizing the receding horizon optimization. With an industrial used traffic-in-the-loop powertrain simulation platform, an urban driving route scenario is built for the source data collection. Both of one-step-ahead and multi-step-ahead predictions are investigated. The prediction results show that for the three-step-ahead prediction, the 1st step can achieve unbiased estimation and the minimum root-mean-square error can achieve 100, 150 and 160 of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd steps, respectively. Furthermore, integrating with the learning-based prediction, a real-time energy management strategy is designed by solving the receding horizon optimization problem. Simulation results demonstrate the effect of the proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Serrao L, Onori S, Rizzoni G (2011) A comparative analysis of energy management strategies for hybrid electric vehicles. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 133(3):031012-1C031012-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang Q, Ossart F, Marchand C (2017) Comparative study of real-time HEV energy management strategies. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(12):10875–10888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim N, Rousseau A (2011) Comparison between rule-based and instantaneous optimization for a single-mode, power-split HEV. SAE International 2011-01-0873

  4. Zhang J, Wu Y (2018) A stochastic logical model-based approximate solution for energy management problem of HEVs. Sci China Inf Sci 61(7):070207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Mi C, Xu J et al (2014) Energy management for a power-split plug-in hybrid electric vehicle based on dynamic programming and neural networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63(4):1567–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cairano S, Bernardini D, Bemporad A et al (2014) Stochastic MPC with learning for driver- predictive vehicle control and its application to HEV energy management. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 22:1018–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Jiao X, Li L et al (2014) A hybrid dynamic programming-rule based algorithm for real-time energy optimization of plug-in hybrid electric bus. Sci China Technol Sci 57(12):2542–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellstrom E, Ivarsson M, Aslund J et al (2009) Look-ahead control for heavy trucks to minimize trip time and fuel consumption. Control Eng Pract 17:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Shen T (2016) Real-time fuel economy optimization with nonlinear MPC for PHEVs. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 24:2167–2175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen T, Kang M, Gao J et al (2018) Challenges and solutions in automotive powertrain systems. J Control Decis 5(1):61–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Borhan H, Vahidi A, Phillips AM et al (2012) MPC-based energy management of a power-split hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 20(3):593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun C, Hu X, Moura SJ et al (2015) Velocity predictors for predictive energy management in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 23(3):1197–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Zhu G (2015) Adaptive recursive prediction of the desired torque of a hybrid powertrain. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 64(8):3402–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen X, Zhang J, Shen T (2016) Real-time scenario-based stochastic optimal energy management strategy for HEVs. In: Proceedings of European control conference 2016 (ECC2016), Aalborg, Denmark, pp 631–636

  15. Yang C, Li L, You S et al (2017) Cloud computing-based energy optimization control framework for plug-in hybrid electric bus. Energy 125:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Y, Ravey A, Péra MC (2019) A survey on driving prediction techniques for predictive energy management of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. J Power Sour 412:480–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moser D, Waschl H, Schmied R et al (2015) Short term prediction of a vehicle’s velocity trajectory using ITS. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Electron Electr Syst 8(2):364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang F, Xi J, Langari R (2017) Real-time energy management strategy based on velocity forecasts using V2V and V2I communications. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 18(2):416–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng T, Lin Y, Qing G et al (2015) A Supervisory control strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on energy demand prediction and route preview. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 64(5):1691–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cavagnari L, Magni L, Scattolini R (1999) Neural network implementation of nonlinear receding-horizon control. Neural Comput Appl 8(1):86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang G, Zhu Q, Siew C (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shen X, Wu Y, Shen T (2018) Logical control scheme with real-time statistical learning for residual gas fraction in IC engines. Sci China Inf Sci 61(1):010203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eski I, Yildirim S (2017) Neural network-based fuzzy inference system for speed control of heavy duty vehicles with electronic throttle control system. Neural Comput Appl 28(Suppl 1):S907–S916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P, Wong H, Vong C et al (2016) Model predictive engine air-ratio control using online sequential extreme learning machine. Neural Comput Appl 27:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alireza M, Manzie C, Nesic D (2014) Online optimization of spark advance in alternative fueled engines using extremum seeking control. Control Eng Pract 29:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Y, Shen X, Shen T (2018) A survey on online learning and optimization for spark advance control of SI engines. Sci China Inf Sci 61(7):70201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Y, Gao J, Shen T (2017) Probabilistic guaranteed gradient learning-based spark advance self-optimizing control for spark-ignited engines. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 99:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang G, Chen L, Siew C (2006) Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 17(4):879–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang G (2015) What are extreme learning machines? Filling the gap between Frank Rosenblatt’s dream and John von Neumann’s puzzle. Cognit Comput 7(3):263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duhoux M, Suykens J, De Moor B, Vandewalle J (2001) Improved long-term temperature prediction by chaining of neural networks. Int J Neural Syst 11(01):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen H, Chan C (2004) Multiple neural networks for a long term time series forecast. Neural Comput Appl 13(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu F, Zhang J, Shen T (2018) Putting HEV powertrain dynamics into a road traffic simulation platform. In: JSAE congress (Autumn), Nagoya, Japan, pp 17–19

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author of this work is supported by Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control under Grant 20161101.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiangyan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work and we declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Xu, F., Zhang, Y. et al. ELM-based driver torque demand prediction and real-time optimal energy management strategy for HEVs. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 14411–14429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04240-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04240-7

Keywords

Navigation