Abstract
Although prism adaptation has been studied extensively for over 100 years to better understand how the motor system adapts to sensory perturbations, very few studies have systematically studied how the combination of the hand used to adapt, and the direction of visual shift, might influence adaptation. Given that sensory inputs and motor outputs from the same side are processed (at least initially) in the same hemisphere, we wondered whether there might be differences in how people adapt when the hand used and the direction of visual shift were congruent (e.g., adapting to rightward shifting prisms with the right hand), compared to incongruent (e.g., adapting to rightward shifting prisms with the left hand). In Experiment 1 we re-analyzed a previously published dataset (Striemer, Enns, and Whitwell Striemer et al., Cortex 115:201–215, 2019a) in which healthy adults (n = 17) adapted to 17° leftward or rightward optically displacing prisms using their left or right hand (tested in separate sessions, counterbalanced). Our results revealed a “congruency effect” such that adaptation aftereffects were significantly larger for reaches performed without visual feedback (i.e., straight-ahead pointing) when the direction of prism shift and the hand used were congruent, compared to incongruent. We replicated this same congruency effect in Experiment 2 in a new group of participants (n = 25). We suggest that a better understanding of the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying the congruency effect will allow researchers to build more precise models of visuomotor learning, and may lead to the development of more effective applications of prism adaptation for the treatment of attentional disorders following brain damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Data availability
The authors confirm that the summarized group data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its Supplementary Material. Raw data and individual participant data cannot be made available because of ethical restrictions. Specifically, all participants in the study signed a consent form which indicated that only the researchers involved in the study would have access to individual participant data. Requests for access to individual participant data must be submitted to the corresponding author, and data sharing agreements must be submitted to MacEwan University Research Office.
References
Andersen RA, Andersen KN, Hwang EJ, Hauschild M (2014) Optic ataxia: from Balint’s syndrome to the parietal reach region. Neuron 81(5):967–983
Arcaro MJ, Thaler L, Quinlan DJ, Monaco S, Khan S, Valyear KF, Culham JC (2018) Psychophysical and neuroimaging responses to moving stimuli in a patient with the Riddoch phenomenon due to bilateral visual cortex lesions. Neuropsychologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.008
Baizer JS, Kralj-Hans I, Glickstein M (1999) Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81(4):1960–1965
Batista AP, Buneo CA, Snyder LH, Andersen RA (1999) Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science 285(5425):257–260
Bossom J (1965) The effect of brain lesions on prism-adaptation in monkey. Psychonomic Sci 2(1–12):45–46
Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44(13):2594–2606
Chapman HL, Eramudugolla R, Gavrilescu M, Strudwick MW, Loftus A, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB (2010) Neural mechanisms underlying spatial realignment during adaptation to optical wedge prisms. Neuropsychologia 48(9):2595–2601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.006
Clower DM, Hoffman JM, Votaw JR, Faber TL, Woods RP, Alexander GE (1996) Role of posterior parietal cortex in the recalibration of visually guided reaching. Nature 383(6601):618–621
Colent C, Pisella L, Bernieri C, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2000) Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals? Neuroreport 11(9):1899–1902
Culham JC, Cavina-Pratesi C, Singhal A (2006) The role of parietal cortex in visuomotor control: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia 44(13):2668–2684
Danckert J, Ferber S, Goodale MA (2008) Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study. Eur J Neurosci 28(8):1696–1704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06460.x
Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Anema HA, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ, Milner AD (2006) Reaching errors in optic ataxia are linked to eye position rather than head or body position. Neuropsychologia 44(13):2766–2773
Farron N, Clarke S, Crottaz-Herbette S (2022) Does hand modulate the reshaping of the attentional system during rightward prism adaptation? An fMRI study. Front Psychol 13:909815
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191
Freedman DJ, Ibos G (2018) An integrative framework for sensory, motor, and cognitive functions of the posterior parietal cortex. Neuron 97(6):1219–1234
Herlihey TA, Black SE, Ferber S (2012) Terminal, but not concurrent prism exposure produces perceptual aftereffects in healthy young adults. Neuropsychologia 50(12):2789–2795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.009
Holm S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian J Statist. 65–70
Holmes G (1917) The symptoms of acute cerebellar injuries due to gunshot injuries. Brain 40(4):461–535
JASP-Team. (2022). JASP (version 0.16.3) [computer software]
Jinkins JR (2000) Atlas of neuroradiologic embryology, anatomy, and variants. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Khan AZ, Pisella L, Vighetto A, Cotton F, Luaute J, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2005) Optic ataxia errors depend on remapped, not viewed, target location. Nature Neurosci 8(4):418–420
Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. (2009). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology: Macmillan.
Luaute J, Schwartz S, Rossetti Y, Spiridon M, Rode G, Boisson D, Vuilleumier P (2009) Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation. J Neurosci 29(1):169–178. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3054-08.2009
Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms I Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. Brain 119(Pt 4):1183–1198
Michel C, Pisella L, Halligan PW, Luaute J, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2003) Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory. Neuropsychologia 41(1):25–39
Michel C, Vernet P, Courtine G, Ballay Y, Pozzo T (2008) Asymmetrical after-effects of prism adaptation during goal oriented locomotion. Exp Brain Res 185:259–268
Mutha PK, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY (2011) Left parietal regions are critical for adaptive visuomotor control. J Neurosci 31(19):6972–6981
Nolte J (2002) The human brain: an introduction to its functional anatomy, 5th edn. Mosby Inc., St. Louis
Norris SA, Hathaway EN, Taylor JA, Thach WT (2011) Cerebellar inactivation impairs memory of learned prism gaze-reach calibrations. J Neurophysiol 105(5):2248–2259. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01009.2010
Pisella L, Michel C, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Rossetti Y (2004) Preserved prism adaptation in bilateral optic ataxia: strategic versus adaptive reaction to prisms. Experiment Brain Res 156(4):399–408
Pisella L, Rossetti Y, Michel C, Rode G, Boisson D, Pelisson D, Tilikete C (2005) Ipsidirectional impairment of prism adaptation after unilateral lesion of anterior cerebellum. Neurology 65(1):150–152
Pisella L, Rode G, Farné A, Tilikete C, Rossetti Y (2006) Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Curr Opinion Neurol 19(6):534–542
Redding GM, Wallace B (1988) Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Percept Psychophys 44(1):59–68
Redding GM, Wallace B (2006) Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 44(1):1–20
Redding GM, Wallace B (2009) Asymmetric visual prism adaptation and intermanual transfer. J Mot Behav 41(1):83–96
Redding GM, Rossetti Y, Wallace B (2005) Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehavioral Rev 29(3):431–444
Reed SA, Dassonville P (2014) Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms enhances local processing in healthy individuals. Neuropsychologia 56:418–427
Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farné A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT (1998) Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395(6698):166–169
Sokolov AA, Miall RC, Ivry RB (2017) The Cerebellum: adaptive prediction for movement and cognition. Trends Cognit Sci 21(5):313–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.005
Striemer CL, Danckert J (2010) Through a prism darkly: re-evaluating prisms and neglect. Trends Cognit Sci 14(7):308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.001
Striemer CL, Enns JT, Whitwell RL (2019a) Visuomotor adaptation in the absence of input from early visual cortex. Cortex 115:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.022
Striemer CL, Whitwell RL, Goodale MA (2019b) Affective blindsight in the absence of input from face processing regions in occipital-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 128:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.014
van Es DM, van der Zwaag W, Knapen T (2019) Topographic maps of visual space in the human cerebellum. Curr Biol 29(10):1689–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.012
Von Helmholtz H (1867) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik (Vol. 9): Voss
Weiner MJ, Hallett M, Funkenstein HH (1983) Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system. Neurology 33(6):766–772
Welch RB, Goldstein G (1972) Prism adaptation and brain damage. Neuropsychologia 10(4):387–394
Werner S, Bock O, Gizewski ER, Schoch B, Timmann D (2010) Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory. Exp Brain Res 201(3):429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2052-6
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant (2022-03608) awarded to Christopher Striemer. The authors would like to thank Brittany Angus-Cook for her assistance with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Bill J Yates.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Striemer, C.L., Morrill, A. Direction of visual shift and hand congruency enhance spatial realignment during visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 241, 2475–2486 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06697-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06697-4