[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

PSMA-RADS to improve evaluation and management of prostate cancer

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) / computed tomography (CT) has become essential in managing prostate cancer, offering superior diagnostic accuracy. The introduction of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved theranostic agent (177Lutetium-PSMA-617) has further enhanced the significance of PSMA PET/CT imaging. Despite its benefits, PSMA-PET/CT is not without challenges, as PSMA expression is not exclusive to prostate cancer cells. Therefore, standardized interpretation criteria are necessary for consistent and reliable communication among physicians. The PSMA- reporting and data system (RADS) provides a structured approach for assessing PSMA-PET/CT scans. Updated in 2023, PSMA-RADS 2.0 addresses previous limitations and introduces a new category, PSMA-RADS 5T, for treated metastases. This system categorizes lesions based on their likelihood of prostate cancer involvement, improving longitudinal monitoring and guiding management strategies. By familiarizing radiologists with PSMA-RADS through case-based reviews, this primer aims to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning for patients with prostate cancer.

Highlights

PSMA-RADS 2.0 enhances the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT scans.

PSMA-RADS 2.0 system is revised to include categories for a range of benign and malignant findings.

The system facilitates communication between molecular imaging and referring physicians by specifying which lesions require further work-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Fendler, W. P., Eiber, M., Beheshti, M., Bomanji, J., Calais, J., Ceci, F., … Herrmann, K. (2023). PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostatecancer imaging 2.0. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 50(5), 1466–1486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-06089-w

  2. Jeitner TM, Babich JW, Kelly JM (2022) Advances in PSMA theranostics. Translational. Oncology 22:101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101450

  3. Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN et al (2021) Lutetium-177–PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 385:1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107322

  4. de Galiza Barbosa, F., Queiroz, M. A., Nunes, R. F., Costa, L. B., Zaniboni, E. C., Marin, J. F. G.,… Buchpiguel, C. A. (2020). Nonprostatic diseases on PSMA PET imaging: a spectrum of benign and malignant findings. Cancer Imaging, 20, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00300-7

  5. Werner, R. A., Hartrampf, P. E., Fendler, W. P., Serfling, S. E., Derlin, T., Higuchi, T.,… & Rowe, S. P. (2023). Prostate-specific membrane antigen reporting and data system version 2.0. European urology, 84(5), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.008

  6. Seifert, R., Emmett, L., Rowe, S. P., Herrmann, K., Hadaschik, B., Calais, J.,… & Eiber, M. (2023). Second version of the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation framework including response evaluation for clinical trials (PROMISE V2). European Urology. 83(5).405-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.002

  7. Rowe, S. P., Pienta, K. J., Pomper, M. G., & Gorin, M. A. (2018). Proposal for a structured reporting system for prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted PET imaging: PSMA-RADS version 1.0. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59(3), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.195255

  8. Hofman, M. S., Lawrentschuk, N., Francis, R. J., Tang, C., Vela, I., Thomas, P., … & Murphy, D. G. (2020). Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. The Lancet, 395(10231), 1208-1216. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620303147

  9. Mamlins, E., Schmitt, D., Beu, M., Mattes-György, K., Henke, J. M., Antke, C., … & Giesel, F. L. (2023). PSMA-1007 Uptake in Ganglia of the Sympathetic Trunk and Its Intra-individual Reproducibility. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 25(3), 554-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01784-4

  10. Seifert, R., Telli, T., Opitz, M., Barbato, F., Berliner, C., Nader, M.,... & Fendler, W. P. (2023). Unspecific 18F-PSMA-1007 bone uptake evaluated through PSMA-11 PET, bone scanning, and MRI triple validation in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 64(5), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.215434

  11. Masselli, Gabriele, Saadi Sollaku, Cristina De Angelis, Elisabetta Polettini, Gianfranco Gualdi, and Emanuele Casciani. “68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy Using PSMA-RADS Version 2.0.” Diagnostics 14, no. 12 (2024): 1291. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14121291

  12. Garg, T., Werner, R. A., Chung, H. W., Khatri, W., Pienta, K. J., Pomper, M. G.,... & Rowe, S. P. (2022). Association of True Positivity with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels and Other Clinical Factors in Indeterminate PSMA-RADS-3A Lesions Identified on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scans. Tomography, 8(6), 2639–2647. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060220

  13. Yin, Y., Werner, R. A., Higuchi, T., Lapa, C., Pienta, K. J., Pomper, M. G.,… Rowe, S. P. (2019). Follow-up of lesions with equivocal radiotracer uptake on PSMA-targeted PET in patients with prostate cancer: predictive values of the PSMA-RADS-3A and PSMA-RADS-3B categories. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 60(4), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.217653

  14. Kuten, J., Dekalo, S., Mintz, I., Yossepowitch, O., Mano, R., & Even-Sapir, E. (2021). The significance of equivocal bone findings in staging PSMA imaging in the preoperative setting: validation of the PSMA-RADS version 1.0. EJNMMI research, 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00745-8

  15. Bakht, M. K., Derecichei, I., Li, Y., Ferraiuolo, R. M., Dunning, M., Oh, S. W.,… & Porter, L. A. (2019). Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer leads to PSMA suppression. Endocrine-related cancer, 26(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-18-0226

  16. Toriihara, A., Nobashi, T., Baratto, L., Duan, H., Moradi, F., Park, S.,… Iagaru, A. (2020). Comparison of 3 interpretation criteria for 68Ga-PSMA11 PET based on inter-and intrareader agreement. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(4), 533–539 https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.232504

  17. Mendoza-Ávila, M., Esparza-Pérez, H., Castillo-López, J. A., & Rodea-Montero, E. R. (2024). Agreement between PSMA-RADS and E-PSMA systems in classifying [18F] PSMA-1007 PET/CT lesions among prostate cancer patients: exploring the correlation between lesion size and uptake. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1368093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1368093

  18. Werner, R. A., Bundschuh, R. A., Bundschuh, L., Javadi, M. S., Leal, J. P., Higuchi, T.,… & Rowe, S. P. (2018). Interobserver agreement for the standardized reporting system PSMA-RADS 1.0 on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59(12), 1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.217588

  19. Grawe, F., Blom, F., Winkelmann, M., Burgard, C., Schmid-Tannwald, C., Unterrainer, L. M.,… & Geyer, T. (2024). Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients. European Radiology, 34(2), 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10083-7

  20. Bundschuh, R. A., Lütje, S., Bundschuh, L., Lapa, C., Higuchi, T., Hartrampf, P. E.,… & Werner, R. A. (2023). High interobserver agreement on PSMA PET/CT even in the absence of clinical data. Clinical nuclear medicine, 48(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000004524

  21. Chiu, L. W., Lawhn-Heath, C., Behr, S. C., Juarez, R., Perez, P. M., Lobach, I.,… Flavell, R. R. (2020). Factors predicting metastatic disease in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET–positive osseous lesions in prostate cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(12), 1779–1785. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.241174

  22. Letang, A., Crombé, A., Rousseau, C., Sargos, P., Merlin, C., Cantarel, C., & Cazeau, A. L. (2022). Bone Uptake in Prostate Cancer Patients: Diagnostic Performances of PSMA-RADS v1. 0, Clinical, Biological, and: 68: Ga-PSMA-11 PET Features to Predict Metastasis After Biochemical Recurrence. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 47(8), e529-e539. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000004259

  23. Reyes, D. K., Demehri, S., Werner, R. A., Pomper, M. G., Gorin, M. A., Rowe, S. P., & Pienta, K. J. (2019). PSMA-targeted [18F] DCFPyL PET/CT-avid lesions in a patient with prostate cancer: Clinical decision-making informed by the PSMA-RADS interpretive framework. Urology Case Reports, 23, 72–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2019.01.007

  24. Farolfi, A., Hirmas, N., Gafita, A., Weber, M., Barbato, F., Wetter, A.,… Fendler, W. P. (2021). Identification of PCWG3 target populations is more accurate and reproducible with PSMA PET than with conventional imaging: a multicenter retrospective study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 62(5), 675–678. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.246603

  25. Zukotynski, K. A., Emmenegger, U., Hotte, S., Kapoor, A., Fu, W., Blackford, A. L.,… & Rowe, S. P. (2021). Prospective, Single-Arm Trial Evaluating Changes in Uptake Patterns on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Starting Abiraterone or Enzalutamide. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 62(10), 1430–1437. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.259069

  26. Huang, S., Ong, S., McKenzie, D., Mirabelli, A., Chen, D. C., Chengodu, T.,… & Perera, M. (2023). Comparison of 18F-based PSMA radiotracers with [68Ga] Ga-PSMA-11 in PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 27, 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00755-2

  27. Pattison, D. A., Debowski, M., Gulhane, B., Arnfield, E. G., Pelecanos, A. M., Garcia, P. L.,… Thomas, P. A. (2022). Prospective intra-individual blinded comparison of [18F] PSMA-1007 and [68 Ga] Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in patients with confirmed prostate cancer. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 49(2), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05520-y

  28. Voter AF, Werner RA, Savas H, Gafita A, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Solnes LB, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Sheikhbahaei S. (2024). APractical Guide to the Pearls and Pitfalls of PSMA PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2024;54(1):119–131. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.11.001

  29. Ceci, F., Oprea-Lager, D. E., Emmett, L., Adam, J. A., Bomanji, J., Czernin, J.,… Herrmann, K. (2021). E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1. 0 for PSMA-PET. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 48, 1626–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y

  30. Wondergem M, van der Zant FM, van der Ploeg T, Knol RJJ. (2021) A matched-pair comparison of [^18F]DCFPyL and [^18F]PSMA-1007 in primary prostate cancer patients. EJNMMI Research. 2021;11(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00745-8

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N. R., M.R., and A. G. collected images N.R. and V.Y. drafted the initial manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed reviewer comments and helped in drafting responses and revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Yaghmai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rafiei Alavi, N., Rahmani, M., Gupta, A. et al. PSMA-RADS to improve evaluation and management of prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04738-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04738-2

Keywords

Navigation