[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating random regret minimization-based discrete choice models with mixed integer linear programming for revenue optimization

  • Research
  • Published:
Iran Journal of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the critical domain of revenue management (RM) within operations research (OR), focusing on intricate pricing dynamics. Utilizing mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models, the study enhances revenue optimization by considering product prices as decision variables and emphasizing the interplay between demand and supply. Recent advancements in discrete choice models (DCMs), particularly those rooted in random regret minimization (RRM) theory, are investigated as potent alternatives to established random utility maximization (RUM)-based DCMs. Despite the widespread use of DCMs in RM, a significant gap exists between cutting-edge RRM-based models and their practical integration into RM strategies. The study addresses this gap by incorporating an advanced RRM-based DCM into MILP models, addressing pricing challenges in both capacitated and uncapacitated supply scenarios. The developed models demonstrate the feasibility and offer diverse interpretations of consumer choice behavior, drawing inspiration from established RUM-based frameworks. This research contributes to bridging the existing gap in the application of advanced DCMs within practical RM implementations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Data and code availability: Data and code are available upon request.

References

  1. Strauss, A.K., Klein, R., Steinhardt, C.: A review of choice-based revenue management: theory and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 271(2), 375–387 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pacheco, M., Sharif Azadeh, S., Bierlaire, M.: A new mathematical representation of demand using choice-based optimization method. In: 16th Swiss Transport Research Conference, no. CONF, (2016)

  3. Talluri, K., Van Ryzin, G.: Revenue management under a general discrete choice model of consumer behavior. Manag. Sci. 50(1), 15–33 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kornstad, T., Thoresen, T.O.: A discrete choice model for labor supply and childcare. J. Popul. Econ. 20(4), 781–803 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gracia, A., De Magistris, T.: The demand for organic foods in the south of Italy: a discrete choice model. Food Policy 33(5), 386–396 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vulcano, G., Van Ryzin, G., Chaar, W.: Om practice-choice-based revenue management: an empirical study of estimation and optimization. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 12(3), 371–392 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McFadden, D., et al.: Modelling the choice of residential location (1978)

  8. McFadden, D., Train, K.: Mixed mnl models for discrete response. J. Appl. Economet. 15(5), 447–470 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chorus, C.G., Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.: A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transport. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(1), 1–18 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chorus, C.G.: A new model of random regret minimization. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastr. Res. 10(2), (2010)

  11. Chorus, C.: Random regret minimization: an overview of model properties and empirical evidence. Transp. Rev. 32(1), 75–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.609947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., Chorus, C.G.: Random regret minimization or random utility maximization: an exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice. J. Adv. Transp. 47(7), 667–678 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H., Chorus, C.G.: Random regret minimization or random utility maximization: an exploratory analysis in the context of automobile fuel choice. J. Adv. Transp. 47(7), 667–678 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, D., Gao, Y., Li, R., Zhou, W.: Hybrid random regret minimization and random utility maximization in the context of schedule-based urban rail transit assignment. J Adv Transp 2018(10), 1–28 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pacheco, M., Sharif Azadeh, S., Bierlaire, M., Gendron, B.: Integrating advanced demand models within the framework of mixed integer linear problems: a Lagrangian relaxation method for the uncapacitated case. In: 17th Swiss Transport Research Conference (STRC), no. POST_TALK, 2017

  16. Paneque, M.P., Azadeh, S.S., Bierlaire, M., Gendron, B.: Integrating advanced demand models within the framework of mixed integer linear problems: a Lagrangian relaxation method for the uncapac-itated case. In: 17th Swiss transport research conference. Transport and Mobility Laboratory (EPFL), Ascona, Switzerland, 2017

  17. Haeri Boroujeni, S.P., Pashaei, E.: A hybrid chimp optimization algorithm and generalized normal distribution algorithm with opposition-based learning strategy for solving data clustering problems. Iran J. Comput. Sci. 7, 1–37 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boroujeni, S.P.H., Pashaei, E.: A novel hybrid gene selection based on random forest approach and binary dragonfly algorithm. In: 2021 18th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

  19. Talluri, K.T., Van Ryzin, G.J.: The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management, vol. 68. Springer Science & Business Media (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sadralashrafi, S.S., Pasandideh, S.H.R., Niaki, S.T.A., Nahavandian, M.H.: The gardener problem with reservation policy and discount. Comput. Ind. Eng. 123, 82–102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kemperman, A.: A review of research into discrete choice experiments in tourism: launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on discrete choice experiments in tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 87, 103137 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gusarov, N., Talebijamalabad, A., Joly, I.: Exploration of model performances in the presence of heterogeneous preferences and random effects utilities awareness (2020)

  23. Chorus, C., van Cranenburgh, S., Dekker, T.: Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: assessment of empirical evidence. J. Bus. Res. 67(11), 2428–2436 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Masiero, L., Yang, Y., Qiu, R.T.: Understanding hotel location preference of customers: comparing random utility and random regret decision rules. Tour. Manag. 73, 83–93 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma, B., Hickman, M., Nassir, N.: Park-and-ride lot choice model using random utility maximization and random regret minimization. Transportation 46, 217–232 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mao, B., Ao, C., Wang, J., Sun, B., Xu, L.: Does regret matter in public choices for air quality improvement policies? a comparison of regret-based and utility-based discrete choice modelling. J. Clean. Prod. 254, 120052 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Iraganaboina, N.C., Bhowmik, T., Yasmin, S., Eluru, N., Abdel-Aty, M.A.: Evaluating the influence of information provision (when and how) on route choice preferences of road users in greater orlando: Application of a regret minimization approach. Transport. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 122, 102923 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong, S.D., Chorus, C.G., Shaheen, S.A., Walker, J.L.: A revealed preference methodology to evaluate regret minimization with challenging choice sets: a wildfire evacuation case study. Travel Behav. Soc. 20, 331–347 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boroujeni, S.P.H., Razi, A., Khoshdel, S., Afghah, F., Coen, J.L., O’Neill, L., Fule, P., Watts, A., Kokolakis, N.-M.T., Vamvoudakis, K.G.: A comprehensive survey of research towards ai-enabled unmanned aerial systems in pre-, active-, and post-wildfire management. Inform. Fusion. 108, 102369 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hillel, T., Bierlaire, M., Elshafie, M.Z., Jin, Y.: A systematic review of machine learning classification methodologies for modelling passenger mode choice. J. Choice Model. 38, 100221 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Soleymani, S., Talebi, A.: Forecasting solar irradiance with geographical considerations: integrating feature selection and learning algorithms. Asian J. Soc. Sci. Manag. Technol. 6(1), 85–93 (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boroujeni, S.P.H., Razi, A.: Ic-gan: an improved conditional generative adversarial network for rgb-to-ir image translation with applications to forest fire monitoring. Expert Syst. Appl. 238, 121962 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nematirad, R., Pahwa, A.: Solar radiation forecasting using artificial neural networks considering feature selection. In: IEEE Kansas Power and Energy Conference (KPEC) 2022, 1–4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/KPEC54747.2022.9814765

  34. Yousefpour, A., Shishehbor, M., Zanjani Foumani, Z., Bostanabad, R.: Unsupervised anomaly detection via nonlinear manifold learning. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng., 1–37 (2023)

  35. Jebellat, I., Jebellat, E., Amiri-Margavi, A., Vahidi-Moghaddam, A., Nejat Pishkenari, H.: A reinforcement learning approach to find optimal propulsion strategy for microrobots swimming at low Reynolds number, Available at SSRN 4559765 (2023)

  36. Ran, L., Wang, Z., Yang, B., Amiri-Margavi, A., Alshahrani, N.: Development of novel computational models based on artificial intelligence technique to predict the viscosity of ionic liquids-water mixtures. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 54, 104076 (2024)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amiri Margavi, A., Babaee, H.: Rank-adaptive reduced-order modeling of 2d incompressible linearized Navier stokes equations with time-dependent bases. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. (2023)

  38. Amiri-Margavi, A., Babaee, H.: Low-rank solution operator for forced linearized dynamics with unsteady base flows (2023). arXiv:2312.00790

  39. Talebi, A.: Leadership dynamics in social multiplex networks with mono and bi-directional interactions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15857 (2024)

  40. Andersson, S.-E.: Passenger choice analysis for seat capacity control: a pilot project in Scandinavian airlines. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 5(6), 471–486 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gallego, G., Iyengar, G., Phillips, R., Dubey, A.: Managing flexible products on a network, Available at SSRN 3567371 (2004)

  42. Liu, Q., Van Ryzin, G.: On the choice-based linear programming model for network revenue management. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 10(2), 288–310 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bront, J.J.M., Méndez-Díaz, I., Vulcano, G.: A column generation algorithm for choice-based network revenue management. Oper. Res. 57(3), 769–784 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haeri Boroujeni, S.P., Pashaei, E.: A hybrid chimp optimization algorithm and generalized normal distribution algorithm with opposition-based learning strategy for solving data clustering problems. Iran J. Comput. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-023-00160-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mehrabi, N., Boroujeni, S.P.H., Pashaei, E.: An efficient high-dimensional gene selection approach based on binary horse herd optimization algorithm for biological data classification (2023). arXiv:2308.09791

  46. Boroujeni, S.P.H., Pashaei, E.: Data clustering using chimp optimization algorithm. In: 11th international conference on computer engineering and knowledge (ICCKE). IEEE 2021, 296–301 (2021)

  47. Mehrabi, N., Boroujeni, S.P.H.: Age estimation based on facial images using hybrid features and particle swarm optimization. In: 2021 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Knowledge (ICCKE), 2021, pp. 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCKE54056.2021.9721496

  48. Mehrabi, N., Pashaei, E.: Application of horse herd optimization algorithm for medical problems. In: International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA). IEEE 2021, 1–6 (2021)

  49. Azadeh, S.S., Hosseinalifam, M., Savard, G.: The impact of customer behavior models on revenue management systems. CMS 12(1), 99–109 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Bierlaire, M., Sharif Azadeh, S.: Demand-based discrete optimization, Tech. rep. (2016)

  51. Paneque, M.P., Bierlaire, S.S.A.M.: Passenger satisfaction maximization within a demand-based optimization framework (2019)

  52. Pacheco Paneque, M., Bierlaire, M., Gendron, B., Sharif Azadeh, S.: Integrating advanced discrete choice models in mixed integer linear optimization. Transport. Res. Part B Methodol. 146, 26–49 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pacheco Paneque, M., Gendron, B., Sharif Azadeh, S., Bierlaire, M.: A Lagrangian decomposition scheme for choice-based optimization. Comput. Oper. Res. 148, 105985 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.105985

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Grenoble Alpes university IDEX scholarship. Dr. Pierre Lemaire and Dr. Iragael Joly provided important support.

Funding

The authors declare that this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Amirreza Talebi: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Software, Validation, Writing—original draft. Sayed Pedram Haeri Boroujeni: Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Writing—original draft. Abolfazl Razi: Conceptualization, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirreza Talebi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author affirms that there are no identifiable conflicting financial interests or personal associations that might have seemed to impact the work described in this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with humans and animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talebi, A., Haeri Boroujeni, S.P. & Razi, A. Integrating random regret minimization-based discrete choice models with mixed integer linear programming for revenue optimization. Iran J Comput Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-024-00193-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-024-00193-w

Keywords

Navigation