[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Modified acceptance sampling for statistical quality control

  • Published:
METRON Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 November 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the article, we look into a situation where a company receives from a producer a shipment consisting of product lots. The products within the lot should be of an established quality; nevertheless, the consumer has to make sure that they are. In order to check the quality of the product lot, a sample of items is selected therefrom, and a certain quality characteristic is measured. Depending on the measurement results, the lot is either accepted or rejected. The aim is to find a minimal sample size balancing the risks of the producer and those of the consumer at certain predefined levels. Usually, the homogeneity of the lot is assumed, and an equal probability one or more phases sampling design is used for acceptance sampling. However, in some cases, the lots are not homogeneous: the items may be of different size, weight or other properties. In the article, some unequal probability sampling designs are proposed for acceptance sampling. Based on the established value of the admissible proportion of defective items as a prior parameter, the posterior distribution for the proportion is constructed, and a Bayesian hypothesis about the lot acceptance is tested. The sample size is determined by simulation from the posterior, taking into account the risks of the producer and those of the consumer. The method can be extended to other sampling designs for which a posterior distribution of the proportion of defective items can be constructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Algorithm 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No data or any other materials, except for the literature according to the references cited are used.

Code Availability

Under request from the author.

Change history

References

  1. Baig, S.A.: Bayesian inference: an introduction to hypothesis testing using Bayes factors. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 1, 1244–1246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolstad, W.M., Curran, J.M.: Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118593165

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Q., Elliott, M.R., Haziza, D., Yang, Y., Ghosh, M., Little, R.J.A., Sedransk, J., Thompson, M.: Approaches to improving survey-weighted estimates. Stat. Sci. 32(2), 227–248 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cochran, W.: Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freese, L., Chen, J.-W., Shilito, R.D.: Sampling of grain and seed to estimate the adventitious presence of biotechnology-derived seeds in a lot. Cereal Foods World 60(1), 9–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-60-1-0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Göb, R., Müller, A.: Conformance analysis of population means under restricted stratified sampling. In: Lenz, H.-J., Wilrich, P.-T., Schmid, W. (eds.) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9, pp. 237–261. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2380-6_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoff, P.: A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92407-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffreys, H.: The Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobilinsky, A., Bertheau, Y.: Minimum cost acceptance sampling plans for grain control, with applications to GMO detection. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 75, 189–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koch, K.: Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kruschke, J.: Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lawson, J.: An Introduction to Acceptance Sampling and SPC with R. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2021). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003100270

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Little, R.J.: Bayes, buttressed by design-based ideas, is the best overarching paradigm for sample survey inference. Survey Methodol. 48(2), 257–281 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery, D.C.: Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert, C.P.: The Bayesian Choice. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-71599-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., Wretman, J.: Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Schilling, E.G., Neubauer, D.V.: Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315120744

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Wywial, J.: Contribution to Testing Statistical Hypothesis in Auditing. PWN Scientific Publishers, Warszawa (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thanks a reviewer for valuable comments.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The whole work was done by the author alone.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danutė Krapavickaitė.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No financial or non-financial interests are directly or indirectly related to the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krapavickaitė, D. Modified acceptance sampling for statistical quality control. METRON (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00277-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00277-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation