Abstract
In the article, we look into a situation where a company receives from a producer a shipment consisting of product lots. The products within the lot should be of an established quality; nevertheless, the consumer has to make sure that they are. In order to check the quality of the product lot, a sample of items is selected therefrom, and a certain quality characteristic is measured. Depending on the measurement results, the lot is either accepted or rejected. The aim is to find a minimal sample size balancing the risks of the producer and those of the consumer at certain predefined levels. Usually, the homogeneity of the lot is assumed, and an equal probability one or more phases sampling design is used for acceptance sampling. However, in some cases, the lots are not homogeneous: the items may be of different size, weight or other properties. In the article, some unequal probability sampling designs are proposed for acceptance sampling. Based on the established value of the admissible proportion of defective items as a prior parameter, the posterior distribution for the proportion is constructed, and a Bayesian hypothesis about the lot acceptance is tested. The sample size is determined by simulation from the posterior, taking into account the risks of the producer and those of the consumer. The method can be extended to other sampling designs for which a posterior distribution of the proportion of defective items can be constructed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No data or any other materials, except for the literature according to the references cited are used.
Code Availability
Under request from the author.
Change history
15 November 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00281-8
References
Baig, S.A.: Bayesian inference: an introduction to hypothesis testing using Bayes factors. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 1, 1244–1246 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz207
Bolstad, W.M., Curran, J.M.: Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118593165
Chen, Q., Elliott, M.R., Haziza, D., Yang, Y., Ghosh, M., Little, R.J.A., Sedransk, J., Thompson, M.: Approaches to improving survey-weighted estimates. Stat. Sci. 32(2), 227–248 (2017)
Cochran, W.: Sampling Techniques. Wiley, New York (1977)
Freese, L., Chen, J.-W., Shilito, R.D.: Sampling of grain and seed to estimate the adventitious presence of biotechnology-derived seeds in a lot. Cereal Foods World 60(1), 9–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-60-1-0009
Göb, R., Müller, A.: Conformance analysis of population means under restricted stratified sampling. In: Lenz, H.-J., Wilrich, P.-T., Schmid, W. (eds.) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9, pp. 237–261. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2380-6_16
Hoff, P.: A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92407-6
Jeffreys, H.: The Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1939)
Kobilinsky, A., Bertheau, Y.: Minimum cost acceptance sampling plans for grain control, with applications to GMO detection. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 75, 189–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.07.005
Koch, K.: Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Kruschke, J.: Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2015)
Lawson, J.: An Introduction to Acceptance Sampling and SPC with R. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2021). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003100270
Little, R.J.: Bayes, buttressed by design-based ideas, is the best overarching paradigm for sample survey inference. Survey Methodol. 48(2), 257–281 (2022)
Montgomery, D.C.: Statistical Quality Control. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)
Robert, C.P.: The Bayesian Choice. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-71599-1
Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., Wretman, J.: Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer, New York (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6
Schilling, E.G., Neubauer, D.V.: Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315120744
Wywial, J.: Contribution to Testing Statistical Hypothesis in Auditing. PWN Scientific Publishers, Warszawa (2016)
Acknowledgements
The authors thanks a reviewer for valuable comments.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The whole work was done by the author alone.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No financial or non-financial interests are directly or indirectly related to the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Krapavickaitė, D. Modified acceptance sampling for statistical quality control. METRON (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00277-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-024-00277-4