Abstract
We examine the relationship between board flexibility in diversity, experienced CEOs and corporate sustainability disclosure (CSD) in the developing economy context. We utilised the annual reports of all the listed commercial banks in Bangladesh between 2016 and 2020. Our study found a positive and significant association between board flexibility in diversity, which includes independent directors, foreign directors, directors with a business background, accounting professional directors, experienced CEOs and CSD. Importantly, the strategic leadership role of experienced CEOs constructs a good boardroom environment for the diversified board to place more emphasis on stakeholders’ interests and business legitimacy in a developing economy. However, we found a negative relationship between directors with a law background and CSD in the developing economy context, perhaps their role might be positive where a regulative environment exists for corporate sustainability disclosure. Our study was controlled by the audit committee and sustainability committee, and we found that the sustainability committee had a positive and significant association with CSD. Our findings have implications for developing economies specifically and around the globe in general.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abduh, M., & Azmi Omar, M. (2012). Islamic banking and economic growth: The Indonesian experience. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1), 35–47.
Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K., & Basuony, M. A. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(2), 301–332.
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198.
Ahmad, N. B. J., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2018). Corporate board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility reporting in Malaysia. Gender, Technology and Development, 22(2), 87–108.
Aliani, K. (2023). Does board diversity improve carbon emissions score of best citizen companies? Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136854.
Alshbili, I., Elamer, A. A., & Beddewela, E. (2020). Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Empirical evidence from a developing country. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 148–166.
Alsmady, A. A. (2022). Quality of financial reporting, external audit, earnings power and companies performance: The case of Gulf corporate council countries. Research in Globalization, 5, 100093.
Amran, A., Ooi, S. K., Mydin, R. T., & Devi, S. S. (2015). The impact of business strategies on online sustainability disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 551–564.
Aras, G., Tezcan, N., & Furtuna, O. K. (2018). Multidimensional comprehensive corporate sustainability performance evaluation model: Evidence from an emerging market banking sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 600–609.
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137–161.
Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: THe International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497–514.
Aslam, S., Elmagrhi, M. H., Rehman, R. U., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1655–1673.
Asogwa, C. I., Ofoegbu, G. N., Nnam, J. I., & Chukwunwike, O. D. (2019). Effect of corporate governance board leadership models and attributes on earnings quality of quoted Nigerian companies. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1683124.
Bangladesh Bank [BB]., (2008). Mainstreaming Corporate Social Responsiblity (CSR) in Banks and Financial Institutions in Bangladesh. Source at: www.bangladeshbank.org.bd
Bangladesh Bank [BB]., (2013). Policy Guidelines for Green Banking. Source at: https://www.bb.org.bd /mediaroom /circulars/gbcrd/aug112013gbcrd04e.pdf
Bangladesh Bank [BB]., (2021). Annual Report-Sustainable and Inclusive Banking. Source at: www.bangladeshbank.org.bd.
Barako, D. G., & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management & Governance, 12, 309–324.
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable development goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24.
Beji, R., Yousfi, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 133–155.
Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., Rashid, A., & Islam, S. (2018). What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 501–527.
Bose, S., Saha, A., Khan, H. Z., & Islam, S. (2017). Non-financial disclosure and market-based firm performance: The initiation of financial inclusion. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 13(3), 263–281.
Chelawat, H., & Trivedi, I. V. (2016). The business value of ESG performance: The Indian context. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1–2), 195–210.
Chen, L., Liao, C. H., Tsang, A., & Yu, L. (2023). CEO career concerns in early tenure and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40, 1545–1575.
Chindasombatcharoen, P., Chatjuthamard, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2023). Corporate culture, cultural diversification, and independent directors: Evidence from earnings conference calls. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 37, 100773.
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2015). The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures. International Business Review, 24(5), 890–901.
Custódio, C., & Metzger, D. (2014). Financial expert CEOs: CEO's work experience and firm's financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 114(1), 125–154.
D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Piccioni, J., & Rosa, P. (2023). The Role of automotive flexibility in supporting the diffusion of sustainable mobility initiatives: A stakeholder attitudes assessment. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 459–481.
De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.
Dodd, O., Frijns, B., & Garel, A. (2022). Cultural diversity among directors and corporate social responsibility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102337.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Zaid, M. A., & Tormo-Carbó, G. (2022). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Mapping the most critical drivers in the board academic literature. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1705–1739.
Elias, A. A. (2019). Strategy development through stakeholder involvement: A New Zealand study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(4), 313–322.
Ellili, N. O. D. (2023). Impact of corporate governance on environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Any difference between financial and non-financial companies? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(2), 858–873.
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent directors’ background and CSR disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991–1001.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gangi, F., Varrone, N., & Coscia, M. (2023). Board cultural diversity and bank social performance: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1310–1320.
Garanina, T., & Aray, Y. (2021). Enhancing CSR disclosure through foreign ownership, foreign board members, and cross-listing: Does it work in Russian context? Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100754.
Garas, S., & ElMassah, S. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: The case of GCC countries. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 14(1), 2–26.
Grassa, R., Chakroun, R., & Hussainey, K. (2018). Corporate governance and Islamic banks’ products and services disclosure. Accounting Research Journal, 31(1), 75–89.
Green Banking and CSR Department [GBCSRD]., (2014). Annual Requirements of Direct Green Finance. Source at: www.bangladeshbank.org.bd
Guan, F., Liu, C., Xie, F., & Chen, H. (2019). Evaluation of the competitiveness of China’s commercial banks based on the G-CAMELS evaluation system. Sustainability, 11(6), 1791.
Hamori, M., & Koyuncu, B. (2015). Experience matters? The impact of prior CEO experience on firm performance. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 23–44.
Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364.
Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Yang, Y. W. (2019). Board nationality and educational background diversity and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: THe International Journal of Business in Society, 19(2), 217–239.
Harun, M. S., Hussainey, K., Mohd Kharuddin, K. A., & Farooque, O. A. (2020). CSR disclosure, corporate governance and firm value: A study on GCC Islamic banks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 607–638.
Ibrahim, A. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2016). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility in Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(2), 279–298.
Ikram, M., & Sayagh, Y. (2023). The Consequences of COVID-19 Disruption on Sustainable Economy in the Top 30 High-Tech Innovative Countries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(2), 247-269.
Issa, A., Zaid, M. A., Hanaysha, J. R., & Gull, A. A. (2022). An examination of board diversity and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from banking sector in the Arabian Gulf countries. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(1), 22–46.
Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 601–615.
Katmon, N., Mohamad, Z. Z., Norwani, N. M., & Farooque, O. A. (2019). Comprehensive board diversity and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 447–481.
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207–223.
Khan, I., Khan, I., & Senturk, I. (2019). Board diversity and quality of CSR disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: THe International Journal of Business in Society, 19(6), 1187–1203.
Khan, M., Halabi, A. K., & Samy, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: A study of selected banking companies in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 344–357.
Khatib, S. F., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A., Yahaya, I. S., & Owusu, A. (2023). Global trends in board diversity research: A bibliometric view. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(2), 441–469.
Khoo, E. S., Lim, Y., Lu, L. Y., & Monroe, G. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility performance and the reputational incentives of independent directors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 49(5–6), 841–881.
Kiliç, M. (2016). Online corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in the banking industry: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(4), 550–569.
Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2019). Determinants of climate change disclosures in the Turkish banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(3), 901–926.
Krishnan, J., Wen, Y., & Zhao, W. (2011). Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial reporting quality. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 2099–2130.
Kumar, K., & Prakash, A. (2019). Examination of sustainability reporting practices in Indian banking sector. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–16.
Liu, H., & Huang, W. (2022). Sustainable financing and financial risk management of financial institutions—case study on Chinese banks. Sustainability, 14(15), 9786.
Lui, T. K., Zainuldin, M. H., Wahidudin, A. N., & Foo, C. C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility disclosures (CSRDs) in the banking industry: A study of conventional banks and Islamic banks in Malaysia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 541–570.
Malandrakis, I., & Drakos, K. (2020). Green banks vs. non-green banks: A Differences-in-Differences CAMEL-based approach. Available at SSRN 3663894. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3663894 or http://dx. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3663894.
Malik, F., Wang, F., Naseem, M. A., Ikram, A., & Ali, S. (2020). Determinants of corporate social responsibility related to CEO attributes: An empirical study. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019899093.
Mani, V., Agrawal, R., & Sharma, V. (2016). Impediments to social sustainability adoption in the supply chain: An ISM and MICMAC analysis in Indian manufacturing industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 17(2), 135–156.
Masud, M. A. K., Bae, S. M., Manzanares, J., & Kim, J. D. (2019). Board directors’ expertise and corporate corruption disclosure: The moderating role of political connections. Sustainability, 11(16), 4491.
Masukujjaman, M. D., & Aktar, S. (2013). Green banking in Bangladesh: A commitment towards the global initiatives. Journal of Business and Technology (dhaka), 8(1–2), 17–40.
Matuszak, Ł, Różańska, E., & Macuda, M. (2019). The impact of corporate governance characteristics on banks’ corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 75–102.
Mehedi, S., Mondol, S., Franco, I.B. (2022). CSR Disclosure through the Principles of UN Global Compact in the Manufacturing Industry in Bangladesh: Evidence from Emerging Markets. In: Franco, I.B. (eds) Corporate Approaches to Sustainable Development. Science for Sustainable Societies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6421-2_15
Mehedi, S., & Jalaludin, D. (2020). Application of theories in CSR research focusing study context and corporate attributes. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(3), 305–324.
Mehedi, S., Nahar, S., & Jalaludin, D. (2023). Determinants of corporate climate change disclosure: Is the mediating role of corporate strategic response to environmental governance and policy matter? Evidence from Emerging Market. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2641
Mehedi, S., Rahman, H., & Jalaludin, D. (2020). The relationship between corporate governance, corporate characteristics and agricultural credit supply: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(7), 867–885.
Mendiratta, A., Singh, S., Yadav, S. S., & Mahajan, A. (2023). Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Analysis of Corporate Social Irresponsibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(3), 319–339.
Minoja, M. (2012). Stakeholder management theory, firm strategy, and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 67–82.
Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 353–372.
Nasih, M., Anridho, N., Rahayu, N. K., & Nowland, J. (2023). CEO masculinity and CSR disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(2), 157–169.
Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153.
Pae, J., & Choi, T. H. (2011). Corporate governance, commitment to business ethics, and firm valuation: Evidence from the Korean stock market. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 323–348.
Pan, L., & Mishra, V. (2018). Stock market development and economic growth: Empirical evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 68, 661–673.
Peng, X., Yang, Z., Shao, J., & Li, X. (2021). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility disclosure of multinational corporations. Applied Economics, 53(42), 4884–4898.
Pham, H. S. T., & Tran, H. T. (2020). CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity. Journal of Business Research, 120, 127–136.
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: An Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 182–210.
Rashid, M. H. U., & Hossain, S. Z. (2022). Does board independence moderate the effect of politician directors on CSR disclosure? Evidence from the publicly listed banks in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(5), 935–950.
Rashid, M. H. U., Zobair, S. A. M., Chowdhury, M. A. I., & Islam, A. (2020). Corporate governance and banks’ productivity: Evidence from the banking industry in Bangladesh. Business Research, 13, 615–637.
Saha, A. K. (2019). Relationship between corporate social responsibility performance and disclosures: Commercial banks of Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(4), 451–468.
El Saleh, A. I., & Jurdi, D. J. (2023). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: Uncovering the effects of co-opted directors. Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-02-2023-0019
Sarker, M. R., Moktadir, M. A., & Santibanez-Gonzalez, E. D. (2021). Social sustainability challenges towards flexible supply chain management: Post-COVID-19 perspective. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), S199–S218.
Settembre-Blundo, D., González-Sánchez, R., Medina-Salgado, S., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2021). Flexibility and resilience in corporate decision making: A new sustainability-based risk management system in uncertain times. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), S107–S132.
Shahu, R., Pundir, A. K., & Ganapathy, L. (2012). An empirical study on flexibility: A critical success factor of construction projects. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(3), 123–128.
Shakil, M. H., Tasnia, M., & Mostafiz, M. I. (2021). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: Moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance controversies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661–677.
Shan, Y. G., Yang, J. W., Zhang, J., & Chang, M. (2023). Analyst forecast quality and corporate social responsibility: The mediation effect of corporate governance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(3), 675–705.
Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1313–1320.
Sinkovics, N., Hoque, S. F., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2016). Rana Plaza collapse aftermath: Are CSR compliance and auditing pressures effective? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(4), 617–649.
Sleeper, B. J., Schneider, K. C., Weber, P. S., & Weber, J. E. (2006). Scale and study of student attitudes toward business education’s role in addressing social issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 381–391.
Sobhani, F. A., Amran, A., & Zainuddin, Y. (2012). Sustainability disclosure in annual reports and websites: A study of the banking industry in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23(1), 75–85.
Sustainable Finance Department [SFD]. (2017). Guidelines on Environmental & Social Risk Management (ESRM) forBanks and Financial Institutions in Bangladesh. Source at: https:// www .bb .org .bd/
The United Nations [UN]. (2021). Inter-agency Task Force on Financing for Development, Financing for Sustainable Development Report (New York: United Nations, 2021). Available from: https:// developmentfinance.un.org/fsdr2021.
The United Nations [UN]. (2023). Inter-agency Task Force on Financing for Development, Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2023: Financing Sustainable Transformations (New York: United Nations, 2023). Available from: https:// developmentfinance.un.org/fsdr2023.
The United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative [UNEPFI]. (2023). Principles for responsible banking to strengthen climate ambition to meet increased expectations. Available from: https://www.unepfi.org/industries/banking/principles-for-responsible-banking-to-strengthen-climate-ambition-to-meet-increased-expectations/
The World Bank [WB]. (2016). Environmental and Social Framework. Available from: https://www.world bank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-framework.
Tibiletti, V., Marchini, P. L., Furlotti, K., & Medioli, A. (2021). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 896–907.
Toumi, N. B. F., Khemiri, R., & Makni, Y. F. (2022). Board directors’ home regions and CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(2), 509–539.
Tran, H. (2018). Differences in corporate social responsibility disclosure between Japan and the USA. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 25(1), 67–85.
Velte, P. (2020). Do CEO incentives and characteristics influence corporate social responsibility (CSR) and vice versa? A Literature Review. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1293–1323.
Venter, E. R., Gordon, E. A., & Street, D. L. (2018). The role of accounting and the accountancy profession in economic development: A research agenda. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 29(2), 195–218.
Volonté, C., & Gantenbein, P. (2016). Directors’ human capital, firm strategy, and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 115–145.
Wahab, S., Imran, M., Safi, A., Wahab, Z., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Role of financial stability, technological innovation, and renewable energy in achieving sustainable development goals in BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(32), 48827–48838.
Wang, J. C., Zhao, Y., Sun, S. L., & Zhu, J. (2023). Female-friendly boards in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113552.
Wang, Y. H. (2023). Board composition and corporate governance performance: Investigating the effects of diversity. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 35(5–6), 578–591.
Wiengarten, F., Lo, C. K., & Lam, J. Y. (2017). How does sustainability leadership affect firm performance? The choices associated with appointing a chief officer of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 477–493.
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
Young, S., & Thyil, V. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Role of context in international settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 1–24.
Zaid, M. A., Abuhijleh, S. T., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2020). Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1344–1360.
Zaman, R., Asiaei, K., Nadeem, M., Malik, I., & Arif, M. (2023). Board demographic, structural diversity, and eco-innovation: International evidence. Corporate Governance an International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12545
Zaman, R., Nadeem, M., & Carvajal, M. (2021). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies: Evidence from New Zealand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(1), 135–160.
Funding
The authors received no funding for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors also declare that they are not members of the editorial board of this journal or guest editors of the journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: Corporate Sustainability Disclosure (CSD) Framework
Appendix A: Corporate Sustainability Disclosure (CSD) Framework
Key Point | Items | |
---|---|---|
Economic Sustainability Disclosure (s) | 1 | Contribution to national exchequer |
2 | Contribution to national economy | |
3 | Information related to retained earnings | |
4 | Information related to capital structure | |
5 | Information related to financial performance | |
6 | Information related to dividend policy | |
7 | Information related to employee compensation | |
8 | Expenditure on CSR/ sustainability activities | |
9 | Remittance collection information | |
10 | Information related to economic value added | |
11 | Impacts on local economy | |
12 | Impacts on global economy | |
Environmental Sustainability Disclosure (S) | 13 | Information related to environmental policy and strategy |
14 | Information related to green financing | |
15 | In-house green decoration/practices | |
16 | E-banking, mobile banking, fin-tech | |
17 | Information related to energy consumption | |
18 | Initiatives to reduce energy consumption | |
19 | Energy and resource efficiency | |
20 | Investing in renewable energy | |
21 | Compliance with environmental regulations | |
22 | Investing in waste recycling/treatment plant | |
23 | Investing in liquid waste management | |
24 | Investing in solid waste management | |
25 | Investing in green agriculture | |
26 | Financing in green/clean transportation projects | |
27 | Financing in Sand-witch Panel | |
28 | Financing in Govt. approved eco-tourism projects | |
29 | Financing in water management and conservation | |
30 | Financing in environment-friendly brick kiln | |
31 | Aiding environmentally friendly programmes, seminar, symposium | |
32 | Initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions | |
33 | Climate change risks mitigation strategies | |
34 | Climate change adaptation measure | |
35 | Tree plantation programme | |
36 | Donate to protect ecological diversity | |
Social Sustainability Disclosure (s) | 37 | Contribution to community development |
38 | Contribution to educational sector | |
39 | Contribution to health sector | |
40 | Contribution to national food programmes | |
41 | Contribution to women empowerment | |
42 | Contribution to disabled person, children, and freedom fighters | |
43 | Contribution to poor and under-privileged people | |
44 | Credit facilities for women entrepreneurs | |
45 | Credit facilities to marginal farmers | |
46 | Sponsoring sports and cultural events | |
47 | Supporting and financing arts and culture | |
48 | Donation to prime minister’s relief fund | |
49 | Donation to philanthropic and charitable organisations | |
50 | Donation to climate change affected people | |
51 | Supporting research and development | |
52 | Participation in protecting human rights | |
53 | Protecting workers/employee’s rights and freedom | |
54 | Employee retention policy | |
55 | Customer satisfaction | |
56 | Anti-corruption measures |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mehedi, S., Maniruzzaman, M. & Akhtaruzzaman, M. Board Flexibility in Diversity, Experienced CEOs and Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: Evidence from the Emerging Market. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 25, 261–282 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00387-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00387-y