Fixes Conflicts with codex and open-codex #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
fix this ASAP due to this Config.json changes (provider/model) not reflected when running the open-codex |
Ntropic
pushed a commit
to Ntropic/open-codex-llama
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a
2DE7
valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is totally an optional PR but I noticed while running both codex and open-codex box projects looks for the same config file.
To Fix this:
I’ve updated the default config directory from
~/.codexto~/.open-codex,adjusted all related constants .with these changes the CLI will now look only in
~/.open-codex/for its config and instructions, so it won’t collide with anything in~/.codex/