8000 perf: reduce parsing error by yenche123 · Pull Request #114 · yenche123/liubai · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

perf: reduce parsing error #114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2025
Merged

perf: reduce parsing error #114

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2025

Conversation

yenche123
Copy link
Owner
@yenche123 yenche123 commented Mar 22, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • 优化了XML内容解析时的错误反馈机制,使错误信息更加具体和明确,从而帮助快速识别问题并提升系统稳定性。

Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented Mar 22, 2025
8000

Walkthrough

此次改动主要增强了 SystemTwo 类在解析 XML 内容时的错误处理逻辑。新的实现首先检查初次解析结果是否存在,然后针对内容中是否包含 <direction><content><tool_calls> 标签或长度小于 10 的情况进行判断。如果满足这些条件,将报告特定的错误信息并返回相应状态;否则,会尝试重新包装 XML 数据并重试解析,若仍失败则记录警告信息并返回错误状态。

Changes

文件路径 变更摘要
liubai-backends/.../ai-system-two.ts 增强错误处理逻辑:添加对 XML 内容中特定标签和内容长度的检测;在初次解析失败后尝试重新包装 XML 并重试解析,最终根据解析结果返回 true 或 false,并记录相应错误或警告信息。

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant S as SystemTwo
    participant X as XML Parser
    S->>X: 尝试解析 content1
    X-->>S: 返回解析结果或 undefined
    alt 解析失败 (undefined)
      S->>S: 检查 content1 中是否包含 <direction>, <content>, <tool_calls> 或长度是否 < 10
      alt 满足条件
        S-->>S: 记录错误 (msg3_2) 并返回 true
      else 不满足条件
        S->>S: 重新包装 content1 为新 XML 结构
        S->>X: 重试解析新的 XML 数据
        X-->>S: 返回解析结果或 undefined
        alt 解析仍失败
          S-->>S: 记录警告并返回错误 (msg3_3),返回 false
        end
      end
    else
      S-->>S: 正常处理解析结果
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: interrupt after error #101:修改了 SystemTwo 类中 toUseTools 方法的错误处理逻辑,与本次增强 XML 解析错误处理机制在代码层面上具有直接关联。

Poem

我是一只活泼的小兔子,
在代码森林里跳跃不停,
捕捉每个隐藏的错误蛛丝,
XML 的秘密被我轻轻解密,
更新如花,开发世界更精彩!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
liubai-backends/liubai-laf/cloud-functions/ai-system-two.ts (1)

944-989: 改进了XML解析的错误处理逻辑

这次改动增强了XML内容解析失败时的错误处理机制,使系统能够更细致地识别和处理不同类型的解析错误:

  1. 检查内容中是否存在特定标签(<direction>, <content>, <tool_calls>
  2. 判断内容长度是否过短(小于10个字符)
  3. 当以上条件不满足时,尝试重新包装内容并再次解析

这种分层处理方式提高了系统的健壮性,有助于识别更具体的错误原因。

可以考虑以下优化:

- // 3.2.1 if content1 has <direction> but parser failed
- if(content1.includes("<direction>")) {
-   this._toReporter(msg3_2)
-   return true
- }
-
- // 3.2.2 if content1 has <content> but parser failed
- if(content1.includes("<content>")) {
-   this._toReporter(msg3_2)
-   return true
- }
-
- // 3.2.3 if content1 has <tool_calls> but parser failed
- if(content1.includes("<tool_calls>")) {
-   this._toReporter(msg3_2)
-   return true
- }
+ // 检查是否包含任何关键XML标签但解析失败
+ const keyTags = ["<direction>", "<content>", "<tool_calls>"];
+ if(keyTags.some(tag => content1.includes(tag))) {
+   this._toReporter(msg3_2)
+   return true
+ }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a3b285 and b2ad72a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • liubai-backends/liubai-laf/cloud-functions/ai-system-two.ts (1 hunks)

@yenche123 yenche123 merged commit 2f5d723 into cool Mar 22, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0