8000 [plugin-web-app-to-rest-api] Add ability to set checked attributes for resource checker by draker94 · Pull Request #5416 · vividus-framework/vividus · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[plugin-web-app-to-rest-api] Add ability to set checked attributes for resource checker #5416

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

draker94
Copy link
Contributor
@draker94 draker94 commented Oct 3, 2024

No description provided.

@draker94 draker94 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2024 12:58
Copy link
codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.63%. Comparing base (78f0e7b) to head (451744b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5416      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     97.63%   97.63%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     7007     7005       -2     
============================================
  Files           969      969              
  Lines         20332    20338       +6     
  Branches       1330     1330              
============================================
+ Hits          19852    19856       +4     
- Misses          368      369       +1     
- Partials        112      113       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@draker94 draker94 force-pushed the add_ability_to_set_attributes_in_resource_checker branch from 53968b5 to 451744b Compare October 3, 2024 13:43
@valfirst valfirst merged commit 48c6880 into vividus-framework:master Oct 3, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0