8000 [Docs] Fixed the incorrect elapsed calculation and inappropriate output format by Aaron2516 · Pull Request #1093 · unclecode/crawl4ai · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[Docs] Fixed the incorrect elapsed calculation and inappropriate output format #1093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Docs] Fixed the incorrect elapsed calculation and inappropriate output format #1093

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Aaron2516
Copy link
@Aaron2516 Aaron2516 commented May 10, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Fix elpased and improper output format in docs scraping strategies performance

Before fix
docs_scraping_performance_issues2

After fix
fixed_docs_scraping_performance_issues

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Improved import organization and code formatting in the example script for better readability.

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced output formatting in the example script for clearer display of results.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes reorganize import statements for clarity, improve timing precision by switching to time.perf_counter(), and enhance output readability with a formatting tweak. No modifications were made to the scraping logic, function signatures, or core profiling functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/examples/scraping_strategies_performance.py Reorganized imports, replaced time.time() with time.perf_counter() for timing, improved print formatting.

Poem

In the warren of code, imports hop in line,
perf_counter ticks with timing so fine.
A newline appears, output clear as day—
Little tweaks, but they brighten the way!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed May 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/examples/scraping_strategies_performance.py (1)

5-5: Nit: Remove extra whitespace after comma
There's an extra space between the imported symbols. Consolidate to a single space for consistent styling.

-from crawl4ai.content_scraping_strategy import WebScrapingStrategy,  LXMLWebScrapingStrategy
+from crawl4ai.content_scraping_strategy import WebScrapingStrategy, LXMLWebScrapingStrategy
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2140d9a and 32065fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/examples/scraping_strategies_performance.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/examples/scraping_strategies_performance.py (3)

2-2: Approve: Separate time import for clarity
Splitting import time into its own line improves readability and conforms to grouping standard library imports separately.

6-6: Inserted blank line – no action needed.

120-120: Approve: Added newline before "Turbo Output"
Prepending a newline improves readability by visually separating the turbo output section from prior logs.

docs/examples/scraping_strategies_performance.py
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def test_scraping():

# Time the scraping
print("\nStarting scrape...")
start_time = time.time()
start_time = time.perf_counter()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use time.perf_counter() in the decorator for consistency
The timing_decorator still uses time.time(), which is less precise and can be affected by system clock adjustments. To maintain consistency with the high-resolution timer used in test_scraping, switch to time.perf_counter():

 def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
-    start = time.time()
+    start = time.perf_counter()
     result = func(*args, **kwargs)
-    elapsed = time.time() - start
+    elapsed = time.perf_counter() - start
     timing_stats.add(strategy_name, func.__name__, elapsed)
     return result

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@Aaron2516
0