[Bug]: target_element does influence link extraction #902

Joorrit · 2025-03-27T11:00:39Z

crawl4ai version

0.5.0.post8

Expected Behavior

As stated in the docs:

With target_elements, the markdown generation and structural data extraction focus on those elements, but other page elements (like links, images, and tables) are still extracted from the entire page.

So i expect to get the same amount of links, when using target_elements and when not using target_elements.

Current Behavior

Without the target_elements i am getting 727 links returned.
With the config target_elements=["#main"] i am getting 410 links returned.

Interestly some of the links that are missing are included in the main div.

Is this reproducible?

Yes

Inputs Causing the Bug

Steps to Reproduce

1. Excecute the code snippet
2. Comment out the line target_elements=["#main"]
3. Excecute the code snippet again

Code snippets

import asyncio
from crawl4ai import *

async def main():
    config = CrawlerRunConfig(
            target_elements=["#main"], # Comment this line out
        )

    async with AsyncWebCrawler() as crawler:
        source_url = "https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus/buergerservice/dienstleistungen"
        result = await crawler.arun(
            url=source_url,
            config=config
        )
        links = result.links.get("internal", [])
        print(len(links))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

OS

Windows

Python version

3.12.0

Browser

No response

Browser version

No response

Error logs & Screenshots (if applicable)

python .\minimal_repo.py
[INIT].... → Crawl4AI 0.5.0.post8
[FETCH]... ↓ https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Status: True | Time: 1.68s
[SCRAPE].. ◆ https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Time: 0.332s
[COMPLETE] ● https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Status: True | Total: 2.02s
727

python .\minimal_repo.py
[INIT].... → Crawl4AI 0.5.0.post8
[FETCH]... ↓ https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Status: True | Time: 1.58s
[SCRAPE].. ◆ https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Time: 0.183s
[COMPLETE] ● https://www.schorndorf.de/de/stadt-buerger/rathaus... | Status: True | Total: 1.77s
410

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

aravindkarnam · 2025-03-28T07:32:26Z

Root Cause Analysis: Link Count Discrepancy with Target Elements

Issue

When using target_elements, we observed significantly fewer extracted links (403) compared to without it (716), indicating unintended interaction between content targeting and link extraction. This affected both our BeautifulSoup and lxml implementations.

Root Cause

The issue was caused by shared references to DOM nodes. When elements were selected for content_element using body.select(), they remained the same objects in memory as those in the original document. Later, when certain elements were removed with element.decompose() during processing, these nodes were removed from both locations simultaneously, resulting in fewer links being found when using target elements.

Solution

We implemented similar solutions for both implementations:

BeautifulSoup: Reparsed the HTML for each target selector using BeautifulSoup(html, "html.parser")
lxml: Created fresh DOM trees using lhtml.fromstring() for each selector

We chose reparsing over deepcopy() for better performance with large documents, as parsing engines are highly optimized for this task.

This approach successfully decoupled content targeting from link extraction in both implementations, ensuring consistent link counts regardless of target element settings.

aravindkarnam · 2025-03-28T07:34:07Z

@Joorrit Thanks for catching this bug. I've applied fix for this in bug fix branch for this month. We'll target this for next release, in the mean time, you can pull in the patch from here.

…imply by changing order of execution :) #902

…ue in content generated. #902

tedvalson · 2025-04-20T17:40:26Z

I just tried the deepcopy fix above: d2648ea
It worked for me. Figured I'd let you know.

I cannot speak to the efficiency compared to reparsing or other methods, that would require some benchmarking work.

…imply by changing order of execution :) unclecode#902

…ue in content generated. unclecode#902

Joorrit added 🐞 Bug Something isn't working 🩺 Needs Triage Needs attention of maintainers labels Mar 27, 2025

aravindkarnam added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2025

fix:target_element should not affect link extraction. -> #902

57e0423

aravindkarnam added ⚙️ In-progress Issues, Features requests that are in Progress 📌 Root caused identified the root cause of bug and removed 🩺 Needs Triage Needs attention of maintainers labels Mar 28, 2025

aravindkarnam self-assigned this Mar 28, 2025

aravindkarnam mentioned this issue Mar 28, 2025

2025 MARCH bug fixes #899

Merged

aravindkarnam added this to the MAR - Bug fixes milestone Apr 8, 2025

aravindkarnam added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2025

fix: fix target_elements, in a less invasive and more efficient way s…

7d8e81f

…imply by changing order of execution :) #902

aravindkarnam added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2025

reverse:last change in order of execution for it introduced a new iss…

c2902fd

…ue in content generated. #902

aravindkarnam added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2025

fix: solved with deepcopy of elements #902

d2648ea

aravindkarnam closed this as completed Apr 23, 2025

aravindkarnam added ✅ Released Bug fix, enhancement, FR that's released and removed ⚙️ In-progress Issues, Features requests that are in Progress labels Apr 23, 2025

thkim-us pushed a commit to us-all/crawl4ai that referenced this issue May 1, 2025

fix:target_element should not affect link extraction. -> unclecode#902

ac59294

thkim-us pushed a commit to us-all/crawl4ai that referenced this issue May 1, 2025

fix: fix target_elements, in a less invasive and more efficient way s…

5661409

…imply by changing order of execution :) unclecode#902

thkim-us pushed a commit to us-all/crawl4ai that referenced this issue May 1, 2025

reverse:last change in order of execution for it introduced a new iss…

d5c96a8

…ue in content generated. unclecode#902

thkim-us pushed a commit to us-all/crawl4ai that referenced this issue May 1, 2025

fix: solved with deepcopy of elements unclecode#902

adbbcba

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[Bug]: target_element does influence link extraction #902

[Bug]: target_element does influence link extraction #902

[Bug]: target_element does influence link extraction #902

[Bug]: target_element does influence link extraction #902

Comments

crawl4ai version

Expected Behavior

Current Behavior

Is this reproducible?

Inputs Causing the Bug

Steps to Reproduce

Code snippets

OS

Python version

Browser

Browser version

Error logs & Screenshots (if applicable)

Root Cause Analysis: Link Count Discrepancy with Target Elements

Issue

Root Cause

Solution