8000 Stub should prefer specific examples over general examples by joelrosario · Pull Request #1761 · specmatic/specmatic · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Stub should prefer specific examples over general examples #1761

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Apr 16, 2025
Merged

Stub should prefer specific examples over general examples #1761

merged 20 commits into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

joelrosario
Copy link
Contributor
@joelrosario joelrosario commented Apr 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What:

The stub should prefer specific examples over more general ones.

Why:

This prioritization will make for more logical resolution of conflicts between examples with similar requests.

Checklist:

  • Unit Tests
  • Build passing locally
  • Sonar Quality Gate
  • Security scans don't report any vulnerabilities
  • Documentation added/updated (share link)
  • Sample Project added/updated (share link)
  • Demo video (share link)
  • Article on Website (share link)
  • Roadmpap updated (share link)
  • Conference Talk (share link)

joelrosario and others added 20 commits April 4, 2025 10:20
@joelrosario
Minor refactoring
4bbf2d9
@joelrosario
All expectations go now into a single class named HttpExpectations
9c70f7a
@joelrosario
Separate dynamic and static nonTransient stubs
c4e769a
@joelrosario
Added a separate function for matching non-transient static stubs
87bba28
@joelrosario
Stub logic now prefers more precise expectations when matching static…
ae79feb 
… expectations
@joelrosario
Added a test to ensure that the order in which examples are picked up…
16b256d 
… by the stub server goes from more precise to less
@joelrosario
Added a test to ensure that the order in which examples are picked up…
43f7c29 
… by the stub server goes from more precise to less
@joelrosario
Refactoring and test cleanup
f232fa3
@joelrosario
Added tests for prioritising more specific over less specific expecta…
ea59d2b 
…tions
@joelrosario
Added tests for prioritising more specific over less specific expecta…
641fda8 
…tions
@joelrosario
Minor refactoring
554c2f5
@joelrosario
Eliminated precision sorting from partials
6b197ad
@joelrosario
Updated the version to 2.7.8
229f638
@joelrosario
Merge branch 'main' into stub_prefer_specific_example
55669db
@joelrosario
HttpStubData now can tell which type of stub it holds, and this is us…
80ccb72 
…ed when segregating stubs during request-to-stub matching
@joelrosario
renamed precisionScore to generality
f8a069b
@joelrosario
Test for mapping expectations to base url when matching against incom…
4470409 
…ing requests
@joelrosario
Added a test for dynamic expectations on custom base url
d65c22e
@yogeshnikam671
Fix the dynamic expectations multi base url test in HttpStubTest
e286fd3
@joelrosario
Added a test ensuring that dynamic expecations work on the right port…
10ca501 
… and fixed a bug found by the test
@joelrosario joelrosario changed the title Stub prefer specific example Stub should prefer specific examples over general examples Apr 16, 2025
@joelrosario joelrosario marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 14:01
@joelrosario joelrosario merged commit 17f2411 into main Apr 16, 2025
2 checks passed
@joelrosario joelrosario deleted the stub_prefer_specific_example branch April 16, 2025 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@joelrosario @yogeshnikam671
0