-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 174
Follow up of JP-3917: Apply code style rules to lib #9423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9423 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 75.99% 76.57% +0.58%
==========================================
Files 368 364 -4
Lines 37020 36626 -394
==========================================
- Hits 28133 28047 -86
+ Misses 8887 8579 -308 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
try: | ||
step = Step.from_config_file(path.join(config_path, config_file)) | ||
step = Step.from_config_file(str(config_path / config_file)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
p.s. Usually the os.path
to pathlib.Path
updates are just busy-work but it does seem to simplify the code a little in this case.
RT https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/14742902470/job/41384736743 is red but I don't see how it can be related, and I also cannot compare to |
I cleared the sonar issues and am rerunning the scheduled run now. |
Thanks! Re-running 🤞 https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/14759149527 |
RT and CI passed. This is ready for review. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM; it's comforting that the codecov report shows 100% coverage, so I think we are safe to go ahead
unlike what it claims in upstream doc
Huh. CI passed and 2 approvals. Why does it still say merging is blocked? |
Approval by Melanie or Tyler is required |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - thanks for following up!
This PR is a follow-up of #9283 . I skipped some rules back then and said I would follow up later with smaller diff that is easier to review. Does this need a JIRA ticket? Not sure.
Tasks
Build 12.0
(use the latest build if not sure)no-changelog-entry-needed
)changes/
:echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst
(see changelog readme for instructions)docs/
pageokify_regtests
to update the truth files