10000 Backport 16374: Prefer replicas that have innodb buffer pool populated in PRS (#16374) by tanjinx · Pull Request #649 · slackhq/vitess · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Backport 16374: Prefer replicas that have innodb buffer pool populated in PRS (#16374) #649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: slack-19.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tanjinx
Copy link
@tanjinx tanjinx commented Apr 25, 2025

Description

backport vitessio#16374

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

…io#16374)

Signed-off-by: Manan Gupta <manan@planetscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanjin Xu <tanjin.xu@slack-corp.com>
@tanjinx tanjinx requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2025 01:50
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution! Before we can merge this, we need @GuptaManan100 to sign the Salesforce Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.7 milestone Apr 25, 2025
tanjinx added 3 commits April 24, 2025 19:06
Signed-off-by: Tanjin Xu <tanjin.xu@slack-corp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanjin Xu <tanjin.xu@slack-corp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanjin Xu <tanjin.xu@slack-corp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
0