8000 let the categories handle "is_commutative" for rings by fchapoton · Pull Request #39303 · sagemath/sage · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

let the categories handle "is_commutative" for rings #39303

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

This makes sure that the method is_commutative for rings is handled by the category framework and not by the auld Ring class.

Also adding annotations on some is_commutative methods

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit d373f69; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

@fchapoton fchapoton mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
2 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator
@tscrim tscrim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2025
sagemathgh-39303: let the categories handle "is_commutative" for rings
    
This makes sure that the method `is_commutative` for rings is handled by
the category framework and not by the auld `Ring` class.

Also adding annotations on some `is_commutative` methods

### 📝 Checklist

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.
    
URL: sagemath#39303
Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton
Reviewer(s): Travis Scrimshaw
vbraun pushed a commit to vbraun/sage that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
sagemathgh-39303: let the categories handle "is_commutative" for rings
    
This makes sure that the method `is_commutative` for rings is handled by
the category framework and not by the auld `Ring` class.

Also adding annotations on some `is_commutative` methods

### 📝 Checklist

- [x] The title is concise and informative.
- [x] The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
- [ ] I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
- [ ] I have created tests covering the changes.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation
preview.
    
URL: sagemath#39303
Reported by: Frédéric Chapoton
Reviewer(s): Travis Scrimshaw
@vbraun vbraun merged commit 056c849 into sagemath:develop Jan 18, 2025
20 of 23 checks passed
@fchapoton fchapoton deleted the is_comm_rings branch January 18, 2025 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
0