-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
fix: make select.web
consistent
#57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bryanmylee
wants to merge
3
commits into
roninoss:main
Choose a base branch
from
bryanmylee:fix-select-label-consistency
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Added another fix to solve #58. |
mrzachnugent
requested changes
Feb 4, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bryanmylee Thanks for another contribution.
For each `<Item>` component, keep track of its `value` to `label` mapping on the `<Root>` component by passing a `MutableRefObject` that stores the mapping from `<Root>` to `<Item>` via context. On render, `<Item>` sets the label for its value. `<Root>` can then call `onValueChange` with `labelForValueRef.current[val] ?? val`, allowing feature parity with the native implementation. This approach works perfectly. Since `Item` must be rendered before it can be interacted with and emit events, this always ensures that `labelForValueRef[val]` exists before `onStrValueChange` is called. Furthermore, since the `value` and `defaultValue` prop requires `{ value: string, label: string }`, the initial render also does not have any issues.
408e728
to
f771f8f
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This solves #26 in making the
<Select>
component consistent on web and native.For each
<Item>
component, keep track of itsvalue
tolabel
mapping on the<Root>
component by passing aMutableRefObject
that stores the mapping from<Root>
to<Item>
via context.On render,
<Item>
sets the label for its value.<Root>
can then callonValueChange
withlabelForValueRef.current[val] ?? val
, allowing feature parity with the native implementation.This approach works perfectly. Since
Item
must be rendered before it can be interacted with and emit events, this always ensures thatlabelForValueRef[val]
exists beforeonStrValueChange
is called. Furthermore, since thevalue
anddefaultValue
prop requires{ value: string, label: string }
, the initial render also does not have any issues.