-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 292
Handle failures in initialization and add cling output features. #38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
That's an awesome set of features! Thank you! |
// Add configuration paths to interpreter's include files. | ||
std::vector<const char*>& args, | ||
bool Verbose) { | ||
static std::vector<std::string> sArguments; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you implement that without statics? Statics are troublesome for multi interpreter setups.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I generally agree, but was following the pattern of AddHostArguments.
I thought it did statics for two reasons:
Avoid redoing work.
Make sure all children get the same flags as parent. In an interpreted environment there's no guarantee that would be true across calls if they are not static.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that makes sense. In this case we force slave interpreters to be with the same invocation flags. Could you explain this constraint in a comment.
Could you also add the pch and |
I'm not sure I'm understanding the logic behind replacing actual error handling with asserts. I understand ROOT is the primary client and you want to keep it happy, but I think it's the hosts responsibility to make sure it is setup went fine. Hence the isValid methods. Is it too problematic to add assert(m_Interp->isValid() && "Initialization failed") in ROOT? |
|
||
// Tell the diagnostic client that we are entering file parsing mode. | ||
DiagnosticConsumer& DClient = getCI()->getDiagnosticClient(); | ||
DClient.BeginSourceFile(getCI()->getLangOpts(), &PP); | ||
|
||
llvm::SmallVector<IncrementalParser::ParseResultTransaction, 2> | ||
IncrParserTransactions; | ||
m_IncrParser->Initialize(IncrParserTransactions, isChildInterp); | ||
if (!m_IncrParser->Initialize(IncrParserTransactions, isChildInterp)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am opposed to this approach in general. I think we should always have a well-constructed and initialized interpreter, this reduces a lot of debugging. What would be the use case here?
Indeed we could add this assertion on the user side. One of the issues would be that we don't really know where exactly it failed. While I am inclined to allow this in some places in cling, I don't feel that the interpreter initialization time should be one of them. Unless there is some very obvious reason or a use case which I am missing. For the library case: Aborting the process is not always a bad thing, especially when we know we are not in a valid state, thus most likely the produced results would be bogus. If we want to continue no matter what, think we need to implement a macro that expands asserts to printing errors and continuing the execution (where possible). This way we would be able to survive asserts in llvm and clang, too. I'd prefer this approach. |
Well I've been logging to llvm::errs() in the places where failure can be detected/logged.
I'm of the opinion initialization has to be one of the cases where failure can occur without aborting. Think of a web-browser, would it be ok to crash the whole thing just because a JavaScript engine wasn't properly initialized, or should that failure be detected and the page rendered differently? Even more important to me is that users will have work (possibly unsaved) before libCling is invoked. If libCling fails: throwing a warning is fine, but flat out abort is unacceptable. I think beyond cling & ROOT this would be the majority of use cases too, you're a subsystem not the owning process. I do agree that aborting is acceptable in some case, but see them as extreme cases where any consistancy can no longer be guaranteed. I see the real issue begin that construction & initialization is intertwined, not only between one object, but several. But any change to this would be a much larger interface change than proposed here. |
Looking at it the changes you're requesting would require:
While I generally agree with 1-3: |
if (CC1Args == NULL) { | ||
delete Invocation; | ||
return 0; | ||
if (!Compilation) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use a variable name that is 'distinct' from a class name (to avoid confusion between constructor and variable)?
95020ae
to
04d8765
Compare
812eb6d
to
8c8de33
Compare
Could you rebase this PR, please? Would this be able to handle:
This would greatly help reducing cling-related issues. |
I'm not sure if you asking whether it records the session or output can be fed back in. |
@marsupial that should be good enough and it could be improved in future. Please rebase to continue the review and merge it in. |
93bc486
to
5fe6276
Compare
llvm/clang could be configured to output a default target not the same as the running process.
…g the DiagnosticsConsumer. Remove temporary variable.
Don't blindly run through initialization; make sure things are going according to plan. If not handle it and run destructors without crashing. Return standard error codes from main.
This has been rebased to master. |
Thanks. I have discussed with Vassil; this is good to go. I'll test before pushing. If I have any further comments it'll be either due to a test failure or after the merge. |
Merged, thanks a lot! Could you provide a couple of lines describing this PR's features, for the announcement of the next cling release? |
Are the additions in the ReleaseNotes not enough? |
Yes they are - and that's probably also why I subconsciously thought of it. Thanks! |
…transactions. This fixes https://sft.its.cern.ch/jira/browse/ROOT-9672 by having cling::Interpreter::DeclareCFunction return the transaction containing the compiled code. With the previous code, cling::Interpreter::compileFunction will get confused by transaction created during the callbacks executed during the cling::IncrementalParser::commitTransaction of the main transaction. Reproducer: With a main composed of 'only': int main(int argc, char ** argv) { char const * class_string = (argc == 2) ? argv[1] : "std::vector<int>"; auto const result [[gnu::unused]] = TClass::GetClass(class_string); return 0; } which is a representation of real use case (in a more complex setup) in ART. We were getting: Error in <TClingCallFunc::make_wrapper>: Failed to compile ==== SOURCE BEGIN ==== #pragma clang diagnostic push #pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wformat-security" __attribute__((used)) extern "C" void __cf_0(void* obj, int nargs, void** args, void* ret) { if (ret) { (*(TStreamerInfo**)ret) = new TStreamerInfo(); return; } else { new TStreamerInfo(); return; } } #pragma clang diagnostic pop ==== SOURCE END ==== Error in <TClingCallFunc::ExecT>: Called with no wrapper, not implemented! Error in <TVirtualStreamerInfo::Factory>: The plugin handler for TVirtualStreamerInfo was found but failed to create the factory object! The reason is that during TClingCallFunc::make_wrapper, the call to cling::Interpreter::compileFunction ends with: if (const llvm::GlobalValue* GV = getLastTransaction()->getModule()->getNamedValue(name)) However in the 'broken' case, the getLastTransaction does not return the transaction for the code being compiled by DeclareCFunction but instead the one used/created at: #0 cling::IncrementalParser::endTransaction (this=0x4a2980, T=0x8c0fb0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:345 #1 0x00007fffeebc7899 in cling::Interpreter::PushTransactionRAII::pop (this=0x7fffffffcb00) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:111 #2 0x00007fffeebc785e in cling::Interpreter::PushTransactionRAII::~PushTransactionRAII (this=0x7fffffffcb00, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:106 #3 0x00007fffeebeb659 in cling::LookupHelper::findScope (this=0x4a9dd0, className=..., diagOnOff=cling::LookupHelper::NoDiagnostics, resultType=0x7fffffffcd08, instantiateTemplate=false) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/LookupHelper.cpp:466 #4 0x00007fffeeabe0df in TCling::CheckClassInfo (this=0x4a0550, name=<optimized out>, autoload=<optimized out>, isClassOrNamespaceOnly=<optimized out>) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TCling.cxx:3630 #5 0x00007ffff7c3040d in TClass::Init (this=this@entry=0xdafd20, name=name@entry=0x7ffff7cb7638 "TGlobal", cversion=cversion@entry=2, typeinfo=typeinfo@entry=0x7ffff7d8b6d8 <typeinfo for TGlobal>, isa=isa@entry=0x477430, dfil=dfil@entry=0x7ffff7cb8cab "TGlobal.h", ifil=<optimized out>, dl=<optimized out>, il=<optimized out>, givenInfo=<optimized out>, silent=<optimized out>) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TClass.cxx:1431 #6 0x00007ffff7c3a1b8 in TClass::TClass (this=0xdafd20, name=0x7ffff7cb7638 "TGlobal", cversion=<optimized out>, info=..., isa=0x477430, dfil=0x7ffff7cb8cab "TGlobal.h", ifil=0x7ffff7cccf88 "/local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TGlobal.cxx", dl=27, il=25, silent=false) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TClass.cxx:1273 #7 0x00007ffff7c3a72a in ROOT::Cr 8000 eateClass (cname=0x7ffff7cb7638 "TGlobal", id=id@entry=2, info=..., isa=isa@entry=0x477430, dfil=dfil@entry=0x7ffff7cb8cab "TGlobal.h", ifil=ifil@entry=0x7ffff7cccf88 "/local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TGlobal.cxx", dl=27, il=25) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TClass.cxx:5607 #8 0x00007ffff7c4b552 in ROOT::Internal::TDefaultInitBehavior::CreateClass (il=25, dl=27, ifil=0x7ffff7cccf88 "/local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TGlobal.cxx", dfil=0x7ffff7cb8cab "TGlobal.h", isa=0x477430, info=..., id=2, cname=<optimized out>, this=0x7ffff7da7508 <ROOT::Internal::DefineBehavior(void*, void*)::theDefault>) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/Rtypes.h:176 #9 ROOT::TGenericClassInfo::GetClass (this=0x7ffff7dab660 <ROOT::GenerateInitInstanceLocal(TGlobal const*)::instance>) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TGenericClassInfo.cxx:250 #10 0x00007ffff7b1a2d8 in TGlobal::Class () at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/core/base/G__Core.cxx:17156 #11 0x00007ffff7ac01de in TGlobal::IsA (this=0xee3bc0) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/TGlobal.h:48 #12 TGlobal::CheckTObjectHashConsistency (this=0xee3bc0) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/TGlobal.h:48 #13 0x00007ffff7be9dcd in TObject::CheckedHash (this=0xee3bc0) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/TObject.h:314 #14 THashTable::GetCheckedHashValue (this=0xe65a20, obj=0xee3bc0) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/THashTable.h:94 #15 THashTable::Add (this=0xe65a20, obj=0xee3bc0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/cont/src/THashTable.cxx:96 #16 0x00007ffff7be6bf1 in THashList::AddLast (this=this@entry=0x5be690, obj=obj@entry=0xee3bc0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/cont/src/THashList.cxx:100 #17 0x00007ffff7c4e0d1 in TListOfDataMembers::AddLast (this=0x5be690, obj=0xee3bc0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TListOfDataMembers.cxx:103 #18 0x00007ffff7ab8785 in TList::Add (obj=0xee3bc0, this=0x5be690) at /home/pcanal/root_builds/v6-14-00-patches/opt/include/TList.h:87 #19 TROOT::GetListOfGlobals (this=0x7ffff7da7a60 <ROOT::Internal::GetROOT1()::alloc>, load=load@entry=false) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/base/src/TROOT.cxx:1767 #20 0x00007fffeeab1058 in TCling::HandleNewDecl (this=0x4a0550, DV=0xedf238, isDeserialized=isDeserialized@entry=true, modifiedTClasses=...) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TCling.cxx:555 #21 0x00007fffeeabb785 in TCling::UpdateListsOnCommitted (this=0x4a0550, T=...) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TCling.cxx:6115 #22 0x00007fffeebd0103 in cling::MultiplexInterpreterCallbacks::TransactionCommitted (this=0x57fe20, T=...) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/MultiplexInterpreterCallbacks.h:76 #23 0x00007fffeed05d71 in cling::IncrementalParser::commitTransaction (this=0x4a2980, PRT=..., ClearDiagClient=true) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:532 #24 0x00007fffeed06399 in cling::IncrementalParser::Compile (this=0x4a2980, input=..., Opts=...) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:663 #25 0x00007fffeebcbc4e in cling::Interpreter::DeclareInternal (this=0x4a0f30, input=..., CO=..., T=0x7fffffffd680) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:1195 #26 0x00007fffeebca8e8 in cling::Interpreter::declare (this=0x4a0f30, input=..., T=0x7fffffffd680) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:823 #27 0x00007fffeebcb560 in cling::Interpreter::DeclareCFunction (this=0x4a0f30, name=..., code=..., withAccessControl=true) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:1096 #28 0x00007fffeebcb862 in cling::Interpreter::compileFunction (this=0x4a0f30, name=..., code=..., ifUnique=false, withAccessControl=true) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/interpreter/cling/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:1140 #29 0x00007fffeeafb83c in TClingCallFunc::compile_wrapper (withAccessControl=true, wrapper=..., wrapper_name=..., this=0xcf3c10) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TClingCallFunc.cxx:270 #30 TClingCallFunc::make_wrapper (this=this@entry=0xcf3c10) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TClingCallFunc.cxx:1096 #31 0x00007fffeeafbcb8 in TClingCallFunc::IFacePtr (this=this@entry=0xcf3c10) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TClingCallFunc.cxx:2233 #32 0x00007fffeeafbe83 in TClingCallFunc::ExecT<long> (address=0x0, this=0xcf3c10) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TClingCallFunc.cxx:2045 #33 TClingCallFunc::ExecInt (this=0xcf3c10, address=0x0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/metacling/src/TClingCallFunc.cxx:2065 #34 0x00007ffff7c56e8d in TMethodCall::Execute (this=0xd97710, object=<optimized out>, retLong=@0x7fffffffd958: 0) at /local2/pcanal/cint_working/rootcling/v6-14-00-patches/core/meta/src/TMethodCall.cxx:457 #35 0x0000000000401009 in TMethodCall::Execute(long&) () #36 0x00000000004010ea in long TPluginHandler::ExecPluginImpl<>() () #37 0x000000000040106d in long TPluginHandler::ExecPlugin<>(int) () #38 0x0000000000400e21 in mytest() () #39 0x0000000000400e92 in main ()
I can't split these as the second relies on the first.