-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths #20431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
woody-apple
merged 4 commits into
project-chip:master
from
andy31415:fix_label_constraints
Jul 8, 2022
Merged
Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths #20431
woody-apple
merged 4 commits into
project-chip:master
from
andy31415:fix_label_constraints
Jul 8, 2022
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Damian-Nordic
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2022
PR #20431: Size comparison from e974dc6 to 68c4e81 Increases above 0.2%:
Increases (39 builds for cc13x2_26x2, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, telink)
Decreases (3 builds for cc13x2_26x2)
Full report (41 builds for cc13x2_26x2, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, p6, telink)
|
woody-apple
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2022
…20431) * Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths * Add a test user label cluster constraint integration test * regen for tests * Restyle
krypton36
reviewed
Jul 8, 2022
|
||
CHIP_ERROR TestAttemptToWriteOverlyLongItemForLabel_1() | ||
{ | ||
MTRDevice * device = GetDevice("alpha"); |
8000
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure how this got in here, but this should be MTRBaseDevice.
andy31415
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2022
…20501) * Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths (#20431) * Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths * Add a test user label cluster constraint integration test * regen for tests * Restyle * Ran zap regen Co-authored-by: Andrei Litvin <andy314@gmail.com>
jmartinez-silabs
pushed a commit
to jmartinez-silabs/connectedhomeip
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
…roject-chip#20501) * Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths (project-chip#20431) * Enforce constraints for sizes of labelstruct label and value lengths * Add a test user label cluster constraint integration test * regen for tests * Restyle * Ran zap regen Co-authored-by: Andrei Litvin <andy314@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Server will allow structs with members larger than 16 characters, but reading the values back will get truncated.
Fixes #19851
Change overview
Add constraint checking into our writer logic.
Testing
Manually tried to write an overly large value, saw back a FAILURE response.
Added a yaml integration test