Npm audit #1611
Npm audit #1611
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @paulr34, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on updating the project's npm dependencies, likely as a result of an npm audit to address potential security vulnerabilities and ensure the project is running on more current and stable versions of its libraries. The changes are confined to the package.json file.
Highlights
- Dependency Updates: I've updated several key dependencies to more recent versions, including major version bumps for
axios(from^0.28.0to^1.10.0) andoctokit(from^1.7.2to^5.0.3). These updates bring in newer features, bug fixes, and potentially security patches. - Quasar Ecosystem Updates: The Quasar development environment has been updated, specifically
@quasar/app-webpackfrom^3.13.3to^4.2.1. I also adjusted the version of@quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jestfrom^3.0.2to^2.2.5, likely to maintain compatibility with the newapp-webpackversion or address specific issues. - Test Utility Version Adjustment: The
test-utilsdependency has been adjusted from^1.1.1to^1.0.21. This might be a correction to a previously incompatible version or a move to a more stable release.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates several dependencies, likely to address security vulnerabilities found by npm audit. While keeping dependencies up-to-date is crucial, some of the changes, particularly major version bumps and downgrades, require careful review to ensure they don't introduce breaking changes or inconsistencies.
package.json
Outdated
| "@quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing": "^2.2.0", | ||
| "@quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-e2e-cypress": "^6.1.0", | ||
| "@quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jest": "^3.0.2", | ||
| "@quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jest": "^2.2.5", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change downgrades @quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jest from v3 to v2, while @quasar/app-webpack is being upgraded to v4 (line 168). This seems inconsistent. Version 2 of @quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jest is for use with @quasar/app-webpack v3. The combination of @quasar/app-webpack v4 and @quasar/quasar-app-extension-testing-unit-jest v2 is very likely to break your unit test setup. Was this downgrade intentional? If it was a mistake, please revert this line to use a v3 release.
package.json
Outdated
| @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ | |||
| "@globalhive/vuejs-tour": "^1.3.4", | |||
| "@quasar/extras": "^1.16.12", | |||
| "@types/yargs": "^15.0.5", | |||
| "axios": "^0.28.0", | |||
| "axios": "^1.10.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The upgrade of axios from v0.28.0 to v1.10.0 is a major version bump. The v1 release of axios introduced some breaking changes, particularly in error handling. The code in src/boot/axios.js accesses error.response.status and error.response.data.message. Please verify that the error object structure remains compatible and that error handling throughout the application works as expected after this upgrade.
package.json
Outdated
| @@ -201,11 +201,11 @@ | |||
| "node-7z": "^3.0.0", | |||
| "node-gyp": "^10.2.0", | |||
| "nodejs-file-downloader": "^4.9.3", | |||
| "octokit": "^1.7.2", | |||
| "octokit": "^5.0.3", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a significant major version jump for octokit from v1.7.2 to v5.0.3, which likely introduces substantial breaking changes. The script src-script/download-artifact.ts uses this dependency. While I see there are tests for this script, please ensure they are still passing and provide adequate coverage for the octokit API usage after such a large upgrade.
8000
package.json
Outdated
| "pkg": "^5.8.1", | ||
| "prettier": "^3.3.3", | ||
| "pretty-quick": "^4.0.0", | ||
| "test-utils": "^1.1.1", | ||
| "test-utils": "^1.0.21", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This change downgrades test-utils from ^1.1.1 to ^1.0.21. While this might be intentional to address a finding from npm audit, downgrades can sometimes re-introduce other issues or remove features. Could you confirm if this downgrade is necessary and what it addresses? Adding a comment in the package.json for such cases can be helpful for future maintenance.
No description provided.