[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

debugger: add long versions of the commands as well as all of their prefixes #1062

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

alpaylan
Copy link
Contributor
@alpaylan alpaylan commented Jan 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Improved command help text clarity by adding parameter names in parentheses.
    • Enhanced command descriptions for better user understanding.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined command parsing logic to support more robust command matching.
    • Added error handling for missing arguments during command execution.
    • Updated command handling for help, list, and continue for clearer user feedback.

@alpaylan alpaylan requested a review from a team as a code owner January 2, 2025 01:42
@alpaylan alpaylan requested review from tomtau and removed request for a team January 2, 2025 01:42
Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the command handling functionality of the Cli struct in the debugger application. The help method's command descriptions are updated to include parameter names in parentheses, enhancing clarity. The execute_command method is refactored for improved command matching using starts_with, and a new helper method extract_arg is added to handle argument extraction and error messaging for missing arguments. Overall, the command handling structure is enhanced for better user feedback and robustness.

Changes

File Change Summary
debugger/src/main.rs - Updated help text to include parameter names in parentheses
- Refactored command matching to use starts_with()
- Added extract_arg method for argument extraction
- Enhanced error handling for commands like grammar, input, breakpoint, delete, and run

Poem

🐰 Debugging Bunny's Command Delight
With brackets and hints so bright,
Commands now dance with clarity's might,
Partial matches, errors clear and light,
Our debugger leaps with pure delight! 🐾
Hop, hop, hooray! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alpaylan alpaylan mentioned this pull request Jan 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
debugger/src/main.rs (2)

131-132: Partial command matching logic is reversed but valid.

Using "help".starts_with(help) is unusual but still works because "help".starts_with("h" | "he" | "hel" | "help") will evaluate correctly. Nonetheless, consider reversing the logic (help.starts_with("help")), which generally reads more naturally.

- help if "help".starts_with(help) => Cli::help(),
+ help if help.starts_with("help") => Cli::help(),

137-151: Repeated code blocks for extracting filenames and rules can be DRYed up.

Repeated usage of .find(" ") and .and_then(...) to extract the argument after a space could be refactored into a small helper function. This would make your command parsing more consistent and maintainable. Additionally, consider if you need to handle filenames containing spaces.

fn extract_arg(cmd: &str) -> Option<&str> {
    cmd.find(' ').map(|pos| &cmd[pos + 1..])
}

// Then each usage:
if let Some(arg) = extract_arg(grammar) {
    self.grammar(PathBuf::from(arg))?;
} else {
    println!("expected filename, usage: g(grammar) <filename>");
}

Also applies to: 157-165, 167-173, 175-180

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c2abb7 and 51f5eff.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • debugger/src/main.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
debugger/src/main.rs (1)

109-119: Great improvement in the help text clarity.

Labeling the command parameters (e.g. “g(grammar)”) is an effective way to guide new users.

@tomtau tomtau linked an issue Jan 2, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor
@tomtau tomtau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@tomtau tomtau enabled auto-merge (squash) January 2, 2025 05:39
Copy link
Contributor
@tomtau tomtau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

debugger/src/main.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 2, 2025 06:30

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@tomtau tomtau enabled auto-merge (squash) January 2, 2025 07:54
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 2, 2025 15:44

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
debugger/src/main.rs (3)

109-119: Consider aligning command descriptions for better readability.

While the help text is more descriptive with parameter names in parentheses, the descriptions could be better aligned for improved readability.

-             g(grammar)     <grammar filename>      - load .pest grammar\n\
-             i(input)       <input filename>        - load input from a file\n\
+             g(grammar)      <grammar filename>     - load .pest grammar\n\
+             i(input)        <input filename>       - load input from a file\n\

135-137: Consider using constants for command names.

Commands like "help", "list", and "continue" could be defined as constants to avoid string literals and ensure consistency.

+const CMD_HELP: &str = "help";
+const CMD_LIST: &str = "list";
+const CMD_CONTINUE: &str = "continue";
+
 fn execute_command(&mut self, command: &str) -> Result<(), DebuggerError> {
     match command {
         "" => (),
-        help if "help".starts_with(help) => Cli::help(),
-        list if "list".starts_with(list) => self.list(),
-        cont if "continue".starts_with(cont) => self.cont()?,
+        help if CMD_HELP.starts_with(help) => Cli::help(),
+        list if CMD_LIST.starts_with(list) => self.list(),
+        cont if CMD_CONTINUE.starts_with(cont) => self.cont()?,

140-182: Consider extracting common argument validation pattern.

The pattern of extracting and validating arguments is repeated across multiple commands. Consider extracting this into a helper method to reduce duplication.

fn validate_arg<F>(&mut self, cmd: &str, usage: &str, f: F) -> Result<(), DebuggerError>
where
    F: FnOnce(&mut Self, &str) -> Result<(), DebuggerError>,
{
    if let Some(arg) = Self::extract_arg(cmd) {
        f(self, arg)
    } else {
        println!("expected argument, usage: {}", usage);
        Ok(())
    }
}

Usage example:

-            grammar if "grammar".starts_with(grammar) => {
-                let grammar_file = Self::extract_arg(grammar);
-                if let Some(grammar_file) = grammar_file {
-                    self.grammar(PathBuf::from(grammar_file))?;
-                } else {
-                    println!("expected filename, usage: g(grammar) <filename>");
-                }
-            }
+            grammar if "grammar".starts_with(grammar) => {
+                self.validate_arg(grammar, "g(grammar) <filename>", |s, arg| {
+                    s.grammar(PathBuf::from(arg))
+                })?
+            }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cbb0ee8 and 14d9996.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • debugger/src/main.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
debugger/src/main.rs (2)

128-130: Implementation looks good!

The extract_arg helper method is well-implemented and follows the suggested approach from the previous review.


140-182: Verify command prefix matching behavior.

The current implementation allows any prefix of a command to match. Let's verify that this doesn't lead to ambiguous matches.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the command strings from the match arms to check for any prefix conflicts.

From the output, these are the main commands:

  • help
  • list
  • continue
  • grammar
  • input
  • breakpoint
  • delete
  • run

No ambiguous command prefix matches found

Looking at the first letter of each command, they are all unique:

  • h(elp)
  • l(ist)
  • c(ontinue)
  • g(rammar)
  • i(nput)
  • b(reakpoint)
  • d(elete)
  • r(un)

Since each command starts with a unique letter, and the code uses starts_with() for matching, there's no possibility of ambiguous matches. Each command can be uniquely identified by its first letter, and longer prefixes will continue to match only their respective commands.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential command prefix conflicts
# For example, "r" could match both "run" and a hypothetical "reset" command

# Get all command strings from the match arms
rg --no-filename '^\s+\w+ if "(\w+)"\.starts_with' -or '$1'

# Get all command strings from the help text
rg --no-filename '^\s+\w+\((\w+)\)' -or '$1'

Length of output: 1265

@tomtau tomtau enabled auto-merge (squash) January 3, 2025 03:12
@tomtau tomtau merged commit 13275f5 into pest-parser:master Jan 3, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhancing pest_debugger
2 participants