-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
Double-charging privacy in DC-GAN example #418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
good first issue
Good for newcomers
Comments
Koukyosyumei
added a commit
to Koukyosyumei/opacus
that referenced
this issue
Sep 3, 2022
…g in DCGAN example
Hi! I'm Hideaki, an undergrad student at the University of Tokyo and a research intern at Tsinghua University on privacy-preserving machine learning. I am currently working on this issue. I've made a PR but need approval from the maintainer to run the workflow. How should I proceed? |
@Koukyosyumei Thank you for contributing! |
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
tl;dr: dcgan.py example adds noise to the fake data gradients, which it doesn't need to.
We should change the training pipeline (because it's more correct) and measure the impact (because we're curious).
See more details and solution proposals on the PyTorch forum thread
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: