-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 648
Add doctest for StepStateScheduler #2394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add doctest for StepStateScheduler #2394
Conversation
@bibhabasumohapatra Thanks ! I left a few minor comments to address. The point is to be consistent witth the previous PR. |
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
wanted to point out epoch ... for clarity, but yes Consistency is valid point. |
Co-authored-by: Sylvain Desroziers <sylvain.desroziers@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, address the comment #2394 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bibhabasumohapatra Thanks, LGTM !
Addresses #2266
Description:
added doctest for StepStateScheduler
Check list: