8000 Forgejo provider uses gitea webhooks, for compatibility with both by Infinoid · Pull Request #793 · leg100/otf · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Forgejo provider uses gitea webhooks, for compatibility with both #793

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Forgejo provider uses gitea webhooks, for compatibility with both #793

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Infinoid
Copy link
Contributor
@Infinoid Infinoid commented May 31, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Update webhook handling for compatibility.
Update tests, mention Gitea in docs and UI.

Fixes: #792

@Infinoid Infinoid force-pushed the fix/forgejo-pretends-to-be-gitea branch from c866458 to 3604656 Compare May 31, 2025 11:06
@Infinoid Infinoid marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2025 11:13
@Infinoid Infinoid changed the title Forgejo provider claims to be gitea, to be compatible with both Forgejo provider uses gitea webhooks, for compatibility with both May 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support gitea as a VCS provider
1 participant
@Infinoid
0