8000 docs: some cleanup by cristianmtr · Pull Request #1745 · jina-ai/serve · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

docs: some cleanup #1745

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2021
Merged

docs: some cleanup #1745

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2021

Conversation

cristianmtr
Copy link
Contributor

Some minor fixes I did while reading a bit through the docs

@cristianmtr cristianmtr requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2021 11:10
@jina-bot jina-bot added size/XS area/docs This issue/PR affects the docs l 8000 abels Jan 21, 2021
@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1745 (793f012) into master (e5e3db8) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1745      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.55%   85.54%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines        6834     6834              
==========================================
- Hits         5847     5846       -1     
- Misses        987      988       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
jina/drivers/search.py 94.73% <0.00%> (-1.76%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 78e27df...0a691c6. Read the comment docs.

@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ def input_fn():
input_fn = (b's' for _ in range(10))
```

> Please note that the current Flow API does not support using `index()` and `search()` together in the same `with` scope. This is because the workflow of `index()` and `search()` are usually different and you cannot use one workflow for both tasks.
> Please note that the current Flow API does not support using `index()` and `search()` together in the same `with` scope. This is because the workflow of `index()` and `search()` are usually different, and you cannot use one workflow for both tasks.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If itis about proper closure of Peas/Pods, it makes sense. If it is about multiple clients under the same scope, that is allowed.

image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. However, the only thing i changed was a comma , lol

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2021

Latency summary

Current PR yields:

  • 😶 index QPS at 1739, delta to last 3 avg.: +3%
  • 😶 query QPS at 33, delta to last 3 avg.: +0%

Breakdown

Version Index QPS Query QPS
current 1739 33
0.9.18 1710 32
0.9.17 1641 32

Backed by latency-tracking. Further commits will update this comment.

@hanxiao hanxiao merged commit e052ae7 into master Jan 21, 2021
@hanxiao hanxiao deleted the docs-minor-cleanup branch January 21, 2021 11:33
maximilianwerk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docs This issue/PR affects the docs size/S
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
0