8000 Install troubleshooting on Ubuntu by DirtyF · Pull Request #5817 · jekyll/jekyll · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Install troubleshooting on Ubuntu #5817

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2017
Merged

Install troubleshooting on Ubuntu #5817

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 27, 2017

Conversation

DirtyF
Copy link
Member
@DirtyF DirtyF commented Jan 24, 2017

closes #5759

  • The link to the troubleshooting page is more obvious on installation page
  • Ubuntu troubleshooting is on troubleshooting page with other Linux specific instructions

/cc @BlueberryFoxtrot

BlueberryFoxtrot and others added 4 commits January 12, 2017 17:28
1. Addition of *Running Jekyll on Ubuntu* section, to address Ubuntu stumbling block as per #5719.
2. Restructuring, and I hope I understood correctly when NodeJS/Python are/aren't required.
3. Gentler wording – it's probably not a good idea to tell punters who hit this page because they ran into trouble that installing Jekyll *is* easy and straight-forward; it *ought to be* straight-forward. (There's always the potential for pain and confusion if not all dependencies are in place.)
@DirtyF DirtyF requested a review from pathawks January 24, 2017 19:34
@DirtyF DirtyF requested a review from a user January 25, 2017 12:38
@@ -10,18 +10,29 @@ encountered and how we might make the process easier.

### Requirements

Installing Jekyll is easy and straight-forward, but there are a few
requirements you’ll need to make sure your system has before you start.
Installing Jekyll ought to be straight-forward if all requirements are met.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we replace ought to be with should be? it's a little less complicated

@DirtyF
Copy link
Member Author
DirtyF commented Jan 27, 2017

@jekyllbot: merge +doc

@jekyllbot jekyllbot merged commit 1ff5902 into jekyll:master Jan 27, 2017
@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 11, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0