fixed block naming in example composite pipeline #479
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
georg-schwarz
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
joluj
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
|
@georg-schwarz is it ready to merge? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the User Docs for Composite Blocks (https://jvalue.github.io/jayvee/docs/user/composite-blocks) an example composite block is defined (CSVExtractor). The block CarsExtractor is defined as a block of that type. In the pipeline, however, the composite block is used instead of the actual CarsExtractor block of that type. This was fixed.