-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
Private organization now shown in /admin/orgs page #6111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
gzsombor
added a commit
to gzsombor/gitea
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2019
project-mirrors-bot-tu bot
pushed a commit
to project-mirrors/forgejo-as-gitea-fork
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2025
…le rewrite (go-gitea#6154) This is my take to fix go-gitea#6078 Should also resolve go-gitea#6111 As far as I can tell, Forgejo uses only a subset of the relative-time functionality, and as far as I can see, this subset can be implemented using browser built-in date conversion and arithmetic. So I wrote a JavaScript to format the relative-time element accordingly, and a Go binding to generate the translated elements. This is my first time writing Go code, and my first time coding for a large-scale server application, so please tell me if I'm doing something wrong, or if the whole approach is not acceptable. --- Screenshot: Localized times in Low German  Screenshot: The same with Forgejo in English  --- ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6154 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de> Co-committed-by: Benedikt Straub <benedikt-straub@web.de>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
[x]
):Created private organization
bca
for usernicorac
, but can't open/admin/orgs
page because of missing administrative privileges...Description
Just upgraded to
64ce159
and marked an organization as private (thanks to @DblK and @lafriks for that feature).Now the private organization is not shown in Admin page at
/admin/orgs
.I think that administrators should be able to see all of the organizations...
Additional info: being a member of that organization, I can see it in
/explore/organizations
but can't see it in/admin/orgs
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: