8000 fix(gcs): add stored_response_path to sent items by ocervell · Pull Request #697 · freelabz/secator · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix(gcs): add stored_response_path to sent items #697

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

ocervell
Copy link
Contributor
@ocervell ocervell commented Jun 11, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for uploading both screenshot and stored response files to Google Cloud Storage for items of type 'url'.

Copy link
Contributor
coderabbitai bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The update modifies the logic for uploading files to Google Cloud Storage for items of type 'url'. In addition to uploading 'screenshot_path', the code now also uploads 'stored_response_path' if present. The rest of the upload process, including threading and URI replacement, remains unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
secator/hooks/gcs.py Expanded upload logic to include 'stored_response_path' for 'url' items along with 'screenshot_path'.

Poem

A screenshot and response, both now take flight,
Up to the cloud, in the soft morning light.
The bucket receives them, side by each,
As rabbits ensure all files are in reach.
With every new hop, our storage grows bright!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
secator/hooks/gcs.py (1)

41-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Repeated storage.Client() creation in every thread is expensive.

Each call to upload_blob instantiates a new storage.Client() (line 42).
For large crawls this can spawn hundreds of client objects, increasing memory usage and authentication overhead.
Instantiate a single client once and share it across threads:

+# Create a global, thread-safe GCS client once
+_GCS_CLIENT = storage.Client()
+
 def upload_blob(bucket_name, source_file_name, destination_blob_name):
@@
-    storage_client = storage.Client()
-    bucket = storage_client.bucket(bucket_name)
+    bucket = _GCS_CLIENT.bucket(bucket_name)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
secator/hooks/gcs.py (1)

13-15: Great to see stored_response_path being uploaded as well. Consider making the mapping immutable.

The change correctly adds "stored_response_path" to the list, ensuring responses are shipped together with screenshots.
Because ITEMS_TO_SEND is meant to be a constant look-up table, replacing the inner lists with tuples avoids accidental mutation at runtime:

-ITEMS_TO_SEND = {
-    'url': ['screenshot_path', 'stored_response_path']
-}
+ITEMS_TO_SEND = {
+    'url': ('screenshot_path', 'stored_response_path'),
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing fil 8000 es that changed from the base of the PR and between a785306 and be86cc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • secator/hooks/gcs.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: template (3.11, ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: integration (3.11, ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: unit (3.11)
  • GitHub Check: unit (3.8)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
secator/hooks/gcs.py (1)

32-35: Potential race: self.threads might not be initialised.

process_item appends to self.threads, but nothing in this file guarantees that the attribute exists.
Ensure the calling class initialises self.threads = [] before any hook runs, or guard against the missing attribute:

-            t.start()
-            self.threads.append(t)
+            t.start()
+            getattr(self, "threads", []).append(t)

@ocervell ocervell merged commit 7c6f992 into main Jun 11, 2025
10 checks passed
ocervell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.16.4](v0.16.3...v0.16.4)
(2025-06-13)


### Bug Fixes

* **dalfox:** reduce chunk size for dalfox
([#700](#700))
([c14be68](c14be68))
* **gcs:** add stored_response_path to sent items
([#697](#697))
([7c6f992](7c6f992))
* mongodb optimizations
([#699](#699))
([c0497a6](c0497a6))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant
0