feat: Jinja syntax highlighting #23760
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #23760 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 62.26% 62.24% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 774 774
Lines 74110 74110
Branches 6371 6371
===========================================
- Hits 46142 46133 -9
- Misses 24337 24346 +9
Partials 3631 3631
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
ankush
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggest
2F88
ion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add Jinja syntax highlighting to ACE editor
ACE doesn't explicitly support Jinja, but "Django" which has a very similar syntax.
Switch from pure HTML to Jinja highlighting in the following DocTypes:
Preview