Storage management design #1837
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
|
Today datashim is not installed as part of the fybrik installation. Shouldn't any dependencies of the storage manager should be installed together with the control plane? |
It does not have dependencies. The only question is whether to deploy it always or not (based on enabled flag), and we decided to deploy it always. |
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
| - IT config policies for configuration options | ||
|
|
||
| ### Phase4 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why do you separate support connection types and storage types? Should they be implemented together ?
|
|
||
| - A single connection taxonomy should be used by modules, catalog conector and storage manager. | ||
|
|
||
| - Deployment of FybrikStorageAccount CRD should be configurable - to be discussed: [issue 1717](https://github.com/fybrik/fybrik/issues/1717) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If FybrikStorageAccount is not deployed, does it mean that the Storage Manager will not been deployed too? Should we support optional deployment of the Storage Manager?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optional deployment of StorageManager is equivalent to optional deployment of FybrikStorageAccount CRD, there is no meaning of deploying one without another. In this design both are deployed unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
…tk1/the-mesh-for-data into storage-management-design
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman <shlomitk@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shlomit Koyfman shlomitk@il.ibm.com
HLD of storage management in Fybrik